Marital Supremacy and the Constitution of the Nonmarital Family

Mayeri, Serena
October 2015
California Law Review;Oct2015, Vol. 103 Issue 5, p1277
Academic Journal
Despite a transformative half century of social change, marital status still matters. The marriage equality movement has drawn attention to the many benefits conferred in law by marriage at a time when the "marriage gap" between affluent and poor Americans widens and rates of nonmarital childbearing soar. This Essay explores the contested history of marital supremacy--the legal privileging of marriage--through the lens of the "illegitimacy" cases of the 1960s and 1970s. Often remembered as a triumph for nonmarital families, these decisions defined the constitutional harm of illegitimacy classifications as the unjust punishment of innocent children for the "sins" of their parents. By reaffirming the legitimacy of governmental objectives such as discouraging illicit sex and promoting traditional marriage, courts obscured the ways in which marital supremacy injured adults as well as children, reinforcing racial gender, and economic inequality and circumscribing sexual and reproductive freedom. Using court documents and archival sources, this Essay uncovers alternative visions of the harm of illegitimacy penalties offered by advocates and activists who framed these laws and practices as centrally connected to poverty, systemic racial oppression, and the subordination of women. Civil rights and poverty lawyers spotlighted the disparate impact of illegitimacy penalties on poor families of color, especially African Americans in the South. Feminists emphasized how these laws disproportionately burdened women--who often bore primary responsibility for nonmarital children's care and support--curtailing their sexual, reproductive, and economic freedom. The failure of these broader accounts of the harms of illegitimacy penalties to influence judicial opinions impoverished our constitutional politics in ways that reverberate today. In a world where marriage is both a privileged status and a status of the privileged, marriage equality that rests upon nonmarriage's ignominy risks reinforcing the many other status inequalities that taint the legacy of marital supremacy.


Related Articles

  • Domestic Torts: New ways to find fault. Spector, Robert G. // Family Advocate;Spring2005, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p6 

    The article focuses on the rise in the cases of domestic torts. It informs that during the last twenty-five years, the numbers of tort and marital relationship cases have exploded. It is a phenomena that all domestic relations practitioners must be prepared to face regularly. Before proceeding...

  • LEGITIMATE FAMILIES AND EQUAL PROTECTION. BAKER, KATHARINE K. // Boston College Law Review;2015, Vol. 56 Issue 5, p1647 

    This Article questions whether and why it should be unconstitutional to treat legitimate and illegitimate children differently. It argues that legitimacy doctrine is rooted in a biological essentialism completely at odds with contemporary efforts to expand legal recognition of nontraditional...

  • The Federalization of Family Law. Elrod, Linda D. // Human Rights;Summer2009, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p6 

    The article focuses on family laws in the U.S. Historically, in the U.S., state legislatures define what constitutes a family and enact the laws that regulate marriage, parentage, adoption, child welfare, divorce, family support obligations, and property rights. The U.S. State Department now...

  • Family Law in a Post - Windsor Landscape. Shultz, Lisa // Advocate (05154987);Feb2014, Vol. 57 Issue 2, p45 

    The article discusses American family law in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in the 2013 case U.S. v. Windsor which deals with the legal rights of same-sex married couples in America and the constitutionality of the nation's Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). According to the article,...

  • Action Cheeklist.  // Family Advocate;Spring2005, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p28 

    The article presents a checklist for actions in domestic relations case. Check, double-check, and thoroughly research the law of the state in which the custodial interference action is instituted. Traditionally, venue should be in the county of the primary parent's home. However, there may be a...

  • Pennsylvania's Atty General Kane refuses to defend DOMA.  // Erie Gay News;Aug2013, Issue 213, p14 

    The article reports on the refusal of Attorney General Kathleen Kane to defend the lawsuit filed in Pennsylvania to challenge the U.S. Defense of Marriage Act. Kane said that she cannot defend ethically the constitutionality of the act because she personally considered the act as an...

  • Mass. sues federal gov't over DOMA.  // Windy City Times;7/15/2009, Vol. 24 Issue 41, p4 

    This article deals with the lawsuit filed by Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley against the federal government over the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).

  • MARRIAGE EQUALITY, UNITED STATES V. WINDSOR, AND THE CRISIS IN EQUAL PROTECTION JURISPRUDENCE. Pollvogt, Susannah W. // Hofstra Law Review;Summer2014, Vol. 42 Issue 4, p1045 

    The article discusses equal protection jurisprudence in America in relation to the U.S. Supreme Court's (USSC's) ruling in the 2013 marriage equality case United States v. Windsor. The views of USSC Justice Anthony Kennedy are mentioned, along with an unconstitutional animus legal doctrine and a...

  • Strange Bedfellows: How an Anticipatory Countermovement Brought Same-Sex Marriage into the Public Arena. Dorf, Michael C.; Tarrow, Sidney // Law & Social Inquiry;Spring2014, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p449 

    Since the 1980s, social movement scholars have investigated the dynamic of movement/countermovement interaction. Most of these studies posit movements as initiators, with countermovements reacting to their challenges. Yet sometimes a movement supports an agenda in response to a countermovement...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics