TITLE

Compromise inevitable on patient's bill of rights

PUB. DATE
August 1998
SOURCE
National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;8/10/98, Vol. 102 Issue 32, p40
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
Editorial. Comments on the fate of the United States bill that aims to protect the rights of patients. Senate impasse over how far to go to protect patients' rights; Implications for the November 1998 elections; Emergence of a bipartisan bill that may not fulfill the wish lists of both sides of the debate.
ACCESSION #
969879

 

Related Articles

  • House Bill on Patients' Rights Protects Providers.  // ASHA Leader;9/25/2001, Vol. 6 Issue 17, p14 

    Reports on a patients' rights legislation passed by the United States House of Representatives on August 2, 2001. Coverage of the legislation; Difference between the House and Senate's version of the bill; Possibility of immediate ratification.

  • Right to die.  // ABA Journal;Jul86, Vol. 72 Issue 7, p64 

    Reports that the California Court of Appeal has ruled that a quadriplegic suffering from cerebral palsy has the right to refuse force-feeding even if that refusal speeds the patient's death. Difference of refusal of medical treatment from suicide as mandated by the constitution and the state law.

  • Senators head home without tackling patient rights. Cassil, Alwyn // AHA News;08/03/98, Vol. 34 Issue 30, p3 

    Focuses on the debate between legislators on patients' rights in the United States. Patient protection act passed by House lawmakers; Provisions of the legislation proposed by Democrats in both chambers; Information on the bill from Republican senators. INSET: Major provisions of HR 4250, the...

  • Patient bill put on hold.  // Business Insurance;08/03/98, Vol. 32 Issue 31, p2 

    Focuses on the decision by Senate Republican and Democratic leaders in the United States to delay consideration of patient protection legislation, after Congress returns from its summer recess in September, 1998. Factors which contributed to the delay of the legislation; Similarities and...

  • Gag rule bill heads for bipartisan approval. Gettlin, Robert H. // Best's Review / Life-Health Insurance Edition;Sep96, Vol. 97 Issue 5, p10 

    Comments on a bipartisan group of nearly 140 House members' support of the 1996 Patient Right to Know Act. Provisions of the legislation; Views from the American Association of Health Plans; Effects of nondisparagement contract clauses; Managed care plans' arguments on the legislation.

  • Assess each patient to determine risk.  // Healthcare Risk Management;Dec2008, Vol. 30 Issue 12, p136 

    The article reports on the requirement that patients that are being admitted for a long-term care facility must be assessed for criminal history in Illinois.

  • Negotiations with Senate set after House passes patients' rights bill.  // Employee Benefit News;Nov99, Vol. 13 Issue 13, p7 

    Reports on the difference between the United States (US) House of Representatives' bill allowing patients to sue their health plans for denials of care and the Senate bill without the lawsuit provisions. Patient protections under the bipartisan patients' protection bill supported by US...

  • Survey of benefits professionals predicts increase in health costs, HMO lawsuits.  // Employee Benefit News;Dec99, Vol. 13 Issue 14, p64 

    Deals with a survey of benefit managers and human resource professionals in the United States conducted at the Employee Benefit News Employee Benefits Management Forum and Expo in 1999. Predicted increase in health costs and litigation as a result of debates on patient rights legislation;...

  • Democrats flex on patients' rights. Lee, Karen // Employee Benefit News;Aug2001, Vol. 15 Issue 10, p1 

    Highlights the victory of United States (U.S.) Democrats with the passage of a patients' bill of rights in the U.S. Senate. Purpose of the bill; How the concept of the bill came about; Procedural impact of the bill.

  • Ethics at the End. Ohlenberg, Elisabeth // First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;May1998, Issue 83, p5 

    Presents a letter to the editor in response to the article "While We're At It," by Richard John Neuhaus in the February 1998 issue of "First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life."

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics