TITLE

Inferior court decision

PUB. DATE
September 1996
SOURCE
Broadcasting & Cable;9/2/96, Vol. 126 Issue 37, p86
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
Editorial. Focuses on the decision of Los Angeles, California Superior Court Judge Hiroshi Fujisaki to ban television cameras at the civil trial of celebrity O.J. Simpson. Lack of need for the ban; Issue on the irresponsibility of media regarding accurate presentation of trial broadcasts.
ACCESSION #
9612301573

 

Related Articles

  • Gag order in O.J. case. Stein, M.L. // Editor & Publisher;8/24/96, Vol. 129 Issue 34, p12 

    Reports on Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Hiroshi Fujisaki's issuance of a gag order concerning the O.J. Simpson's civil trial. Media organizations' filing of a lawsuit contesting the gag order; Fujisaki's decision to postpone the trial from its scheduled September 9, 1996 opening;...

  • In the dark.  // Editor & Publisher;8/31/96, Vol. 129 Issue 35, p8 

    Editorial. Disagrees with the August 1996 decision by California Superior Court Judge Hiroshi Fujisaki to deny access to all cameras at the civil trial of O.J. Simpson.

  • On O.J.: Fujisaki will not buck status quo on race matters. Schatzman, Dennis // New York Amsterdam News;9/21/96, Vol. 87 Issue 38, p13 

    Opinion. Comments on the selection of Los Angeles County, California Superior Court Judge Hiroshi Fujisaki as judge and Santa Monica, California as venue of the trial for the wrongful death suits against O.J. Simpson. Expected sympathy of the judge for the plaintiffs; Decisions in a case...

  • O.J. buildup. C.M. // Broadcasting & Cable;9/5/94, Vol. 124 Issue 36, p57 

    Reports on the expected bigger turnout of news organizations for the coverage of the murder trial involving football hall-of-famer O.J. Simpson. Amount spent by media groups to wire the Los Angeles, California courthouse for coverage; Establishment of five pool feeds to follow the action;...

  • Open court.  // Broadcasting & Cable;9/5/94, Vol. 124 Issue 36, p58 

    Editorial. Comments on a California judge's plans to clamped down on media coverage of the murder trial involving football hall-of-famer O.J. Simpson. Proposal to seal all documents pertaining to the case; Media groups' arguments against the gag order; Effects of media on the jury's decision.

  • Media spend their last day at the O.J. trial. Stein, M.L. // Editor & Publisher;10/7/95, Vol. 128 Issue 40, p10 

    Reports on the media frenzy before and after the jury verdict was given on the O.J. Simpson murder trial case. Judge Lance Ito's warning for the jurors on the persistence of media for any comments or remarks after the trial; Description of the atmosphere among journalists before the ruling;...

  • Report card on O.J. press coverage. Marks, Alexandra // Christian Science Monitor;10/5/95, Vol. 87 Issue 218, p4 

    Discusses the media coverage of the O.J. Simpson case. Poll publication and racial issue; Discussion of racial prejudices. INSET: How Simpson verdict plays in cyberspace by Laurent Belsie..

  • In praise of the media's O.J. Simpson case coverage. Kaplan, Joel // Editor & Publisher;11/19/94, Vol. 127 Issue 47, p56 

    Comments on the media coverage of football hero and movie star O.J. Simpson's murder trial. Criticism of the intensity of the media's coverage; Traditional role of the press; Positive developments that came out of the intense coverage.

  • America loves fresh juice. Wright, Frank Lloyd // New York;10/10/94, Vol. 27 Issue 40, p15 

    Reports on the news coverage of ex-football star O.J. Simpson's murder trial. Minimal coverage of other crimes.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics