The other big case

October 1995
Pensions & Investments;10/16/1995, Vol. 23 Issue 21, p10
Opinion. Comments on Procter & Gamble Co.'s lawsuit against Bankers Trust Co. Breakdown in professional trust; Constitutional issues raised; Arrangements between the two litigants.


Related Articles

  • Bankers Trust wins votes of confidence. Barr, Paul G.; Williams, Fred // Pensions & Investments;10/16/1995, Vol. 23 Issue 21, p3 

    Reports on the impact of the lawsuits filed by Procter & Gamble Co. against Bankers Trust Co. over derivatives losses. Vote of confidence from pension executives for Bankers Trust; Released transcripts of damaging statements made by Bankers Trust executives; Value of Bankers Trust's index fund.

  • Gibson and P&G go to the mat. Myers, Randy // Treasury & Risk Management;Nov/Dec94, Vol. 4 Issue 5, p11 

    Reports on the plan of Gibson Greetings Inc. and Procter & Gamble Co. (P&G) to sue Bankers Trust Co. (BT) in a bid to recoup their over-the- counter derivatives losses. Gibson's allegations that banker withheld information on derivatives; Non-disclosure to P&G of terms and risks; Comments of...

  • P&G sues Bankers Trust.  // Business Insurance;10/31/94, Vol. 28 Issue 44, p2 

    Reports on Procter & Gamble Co.'s fraud and deceptive sales practices suit against Bankers Trust Company. Lawsuit's allegations.

  • Stop the presses. Wilkins, Richard D. // Business Journal Serving Southern Tier, CNY, Mohawk Valley, Fing;12/25/95, Vol. 9 Issue 26, p17 

    Looks at tapes used in the civil suit brought by Procter and Gamble against Bankers Trust. Information in the October 16, 1995 issue of `Business Week;' Details of case.

  • Derivatives loss drives P&G to court. Lawrence, Jennifer; Sloan, Pat // Advertising Age;10/31/1994, Vol. 65 Issue 46, p38 

    Reports on Procter & Gamble (P&G) Co.'s lawsuit against Bankers Trust Co. over a derivatives transaction. Claims in the suit; Response from Bankers Trust; P&G's financial performance for the quarter ended September 30, 1994.

  • Worth knowing. Bergsman, Steve // Treasury & Risk Management;Sep/Oct95, Vol. 5 Issue 5, p9 

    Features Carl B. Rubin, the district court judge presiding over Procter & Gamble's lawsuit against Bankers Trust. Suit's intention to hold the bank liable for derivatives losses sustained in early 1994; Scheduled start of trial proceedings; Comments on his work.

  • Derivatives ruling left much unresolved. Forster, Denis M. // American Banker;7/3/1996, Vol. 161 Issue 127, p22 

    Opinion. Comments on the potential future effect of US District Judge John Feikens' decision in the Procter & Gamble (P&G) versus Bankers Trust litigation. Judge's issuance of an order and opinion dismissing 12 bases for recovery asserted by P&G; Decision to leave intact P&G's common-law fraud...

  • P&G sues Cosmyl on packaging.  // WWD: Women's Wear Daily;5/31/96, Vol. 171 Issue 106, p11 

    Reports that Procter & Gamble Co. has filed suit to stop Cosmyl Inc. from selling its Spa Professional Moisturizing Body Wash. P&G contention that the Cosmyl product infringes on the packaging design of P&G product Oil of Olay Moisturizing Body Wash.

  • P&G sees `red' over fragrance, sues rival Revlon.  // Brandweek;9/5/94, Vol. 35 Issue 34, p9 

    Reports on Procter & Gamble Co.'s filing of a lawsuit seeking to stop rival cosmetics marketer Revlon Inc. from selling the new fragrance Charlie Red. Trademark infringement claims.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics