TITLE

Ethics in Scientific Publication: Plagiarism and other Scientific Misconduct

AUTHOR(S)
Al Lamki, Lamk
PUB. DATE
November 2013
SOURCE
Oman Medical Journal;Nov2013, Vol. 28 Issue 6, p379
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
The author discusses ethics in medical journal publishing. He defines ethical manuscript as one which is free from any forms of scientific misconduct. He stresses the need of medical editors not to accept plagiarism and to be vigilant in taking steps to discourage it. He discusses many forms of unethical research such as fabrication and falsification.
ACCESSION #
91944332

 

Related Articles

  • The perils of copy and paste: Plagiarism in scientific publishing. Horrom, Tristan A. // Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development;2012, Vol. 49 Issue 8, pvii 

    The article discusses the plagiarism issues in the scientific publishing. It notes that research misconduct is increasing despite efforts of publishing community addressing the issue which reported to be due to the unprecedented growth in the number of researchers and scientific publishing. It...

  • Pharmacy Practice suffered a plagiarism case. FERNANDEZ-LLIMOS, Fernando // Pharmacy Practice (1886-3655);Jan-Mar2012, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p1 

    No abstract available.

  • A Case of Plagiarism: Lessons for Editors, Authors, Reviewers, Readers, and Plagiarists. Grif Alspach, JoAnn // Critical Care Nurse;Oct2014, Vol. 34 Issue 5, p12 

    The author discusses lessons that editors, authors, readers and reviewers should know about plagiarism. Topics covered include the definition of the term "plagiarism" and implications of plagiarism for professional conduct and publication ethics. Also mentioned is the use of software that could...

  • Avoiding scientific misconduct. Edwards, Hazel // Ultrasound;Nov2011, Vol. 19 Issue 4, p181 

    No abstract available.

  • Scientific misconduct -- Why we must be careful. Kekre, Nitin S. // Indian Journal of Urology;Jul-Sep2012, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p247 

    The author discusses the issue of misconduct by scientific professionals and the need to educate authors in a move to reduce genuine errors. He comments on the falsification of data, which can be quite difficult to detect and includes a spectrum ranging from fabrication of a small amount of data...

  • Duplicate Publication: Why Do We Care? Munk, Peter L. // Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal;Aug2011, Vol. 62 Issue 3, p164 

    The author reflects on research articles which are submitted in duplicate form to more than one journal and are submitted to each journal as unique. The author suggests that the idea of duplicate publication is important for several reasons, including the fact that publication space in journals...

  • Breaking off the Science Misconduct; Responsibilities of the International Associations. Heidary, Fatemeh; Rahimi, Abolfazl; Gharebaghi, Reza // Iranian Journal of Public Health;Apr2013, Vol. 42 Issue 4, p445 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Construction of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Questionnaire for Assessing Plagiarism" that was published in Iranian Journal of Public Health, 2012 issue.

  • Consortium of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery Journals to Collaborate in Maintenance of High Ethical Standards. Benninger, Michael S.; Jackler, Robert K.; Johnson, Jonas T.; Johns, Michael M.; Kennedy, David W.; Ruben, Robert J.; Sataloff, Robert T.; Smith, J. H.; Weber, Peter C.; Weber, Randal S.; Young, Eric D. // American Journal of Rhinology;May/Jun2005, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p227 

    The article reports that the editor-in-chiefs of major medical journals in the field of otolaryngology have reached an agreement intended to uphold high standards of ethical behavior on the part of contributing authors. One of the easiest areas to identify are duplicate publications, which are...

  • Peering into Peer Review: Galileo, ESP, Dr Scott Reuben, and Advancing Our Professional Evolution. Biddle, Chuck // AANA Journal;Oct2011, Vol. 79 Issue 5, p365 

    The fundamental purpose of peer review is quality it may fail that objective under certain conditions. This control that facilitates the introduction of information editorial serves to inform readers of the nature and into our discipline; information that is essential to the goals of the peer...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics