A future for public tribunals?

Parish, Colin
November 2011
Mental Health Practice;Nov2011, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p3
Academic Journal
The author reflects on the latest developments in the operation of the mental health review tribunals in Great Britain as of November 2011. He cites the move by the tribunal to hear the case of patient Albert Haines in public for the first time in September 2011. He claims, however, that there is no firm evidence that hearing mental health cases in public serves the interests of the justice or patients favorably.


Related Articles

  • Secrecy of tribunals challenged by Broadmoor patient's hearing. Parish, Colin // Mental Health Practice;Nov2011, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p6 

    The article discusses the case of Berkshire, England-based Broadmoor high security hospital inpatient Albert Haines, who waived his right to confidentiality so that his case could be heard in public by the mental health review tribunals. Presiding Judge Richard McGregor-Johnson approved Haines'...

  • Treatments under mental health act may be unlawful.  // Mental Health Practice;Oct2011, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p4 

    The article discusses the report released by the Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland, which warned that compulsory treatments under the country's Mental Health (Care and Treatment) Act 2003 are illegal.

  • More young people in Scotland detained under mental health laws.  // Mental Health Practice;Dec2011, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p4 

    The article highlights the Mental Welfare Commission's report that for 2010-11 more young people have been detained in Scotland under the mental health law, specifically due to concerns about suicide.

  • Understanding and implementing the nurse's holding power (section 5(4)) of the Mental Health Act 1983. Ashmore, Russell; Carver, Neil // Mental Health Practice;Sep2014, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p30 

    This article explores section 5(4) of the Mental Health Act, which permits nurses of a ‘prescribed class’ to detain an informal inpatient who is receiving treatment for mental disorder for up to six hours or until a doctor or approved clinician arrives. The article raises various...

  • First mental health tribunal held in public sets legal precedent.  // Mental Health Practice;Nov2011, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p4 

    The article discusses the legal implications of the first public mental health tribunal held in central London, England in September 2011 involving patient Albert Haines, who argued that he is not mentally ill.

  • Legal eye. Spencer-Lane, Tim // Mental Health Today;Sep/Oct2014, p20 

    No abstract available.

  • CIVIL COMMITMENT IN THE UNITED STATES. TESTA, MEGAN; WEST, SARA G. // Psychiatry (1550-5952);Oct2010, Vol. 7 Issue 10, p30 

    This article reviews the academic literature on the psychiatric practice of civil commitment. It provides an overview of the history of involuntary psychiatric hospitalization in the United States--from the creation of the first asylum and the era of institutionalization to the movement of...

  • Time to face new realities; mental health care bill-2013. Kala, Anirudh // Indian Journal of Psychiatry;Jul-Sep2013, Vol. 55 Issue 3, p216 

    The author comments on the passage of the 2013 Mental Health Care Bill, that suggest to ban the unmodified electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in minors, in India. He mentions that the new legislation works against patients' interests because there are no evidences that ECT has numerous detrimental...

  • Time to address inappropriate use of section 62 ‘urgent treatment’. Sollitt, Kirsty; Shenoy, Suraj // Mental Health Practice;Oct2014, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p26 

    There are concerns that urgent treatment under section 62 of the Mental Health Act 1983 is being used increasingly because of delays in getting a second opinion. It is therefore of paramount importance that section 62 is used and recorded appropriately. The Mental Health Act code of practice...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics