TITLE

Executing the Mentally Retarded

PUB. DATE
April 2002
SOURCE
America;4/29/2002, Vol. 186 Issue 14, p3
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
Editorial. Explores the question of whether mentally retarded people should be executed, which is under consideration by the U.S. Supreme Court. Controversy surrounding the case of Atkins v. Commonwealth of Virginia; States which have enacted laws against executing the retarded; Issue of the ability of mentally retarded defendants to assist in their defense; Mention of a report issued by Human Rights Watch; Argument that there is a growing public awareness of unfairness in the death penalty system.
ACCESSION #
6566396

 

Related Articles

  • Supreme Court to Review Execution of the Intellectually Disabled. Cohen, Fred // Correctional Mental Health Report;Nov/Dec2016, Vol. 18 Issue 4, p59 

    The article discusses the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to review the execution of Texas inmate Bobby Moore who was intellectually disabled. It mentions that the execution of Moore received media attention since the court exempted from capital punishment those offenders who were mentally...

  • Spared by Their Low IQ. Lacayo, Richard; Duffy, Michael; Mustafa, Nadia; Pitluk, Adam // Time International (South Pacific Edition);7/1/2002, Issue 25, p34 

    Reports that the United States Supreme Court has barred the execution of the mentally retarded. Questions over which prisoners qualify; Details of the murder case of Daryl Renard Atkins, who has an IQ of 59, well below the threshold of 70 for mental deficiency; Number of inmates on death row.

  • Court to review executions of retarded.  // Christian Century;04/11/2001, Vol. 118 Issue 12, p9 

    Reports that the United States Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments on the execution of mentally retarded people involving the case of convicted murderer Ernest P. McCarver. Report issued by the Human Rights Watch on the execution of mentally retarded prisoners; Arguments against the...

  • Assembly-Line Executions.  // Christian Science Monitor;4/19/99, Vol. 91 Issue 99, p8 

    Editorial. Discusses Virginia's system of justice in capital cases. Fact that Virginia executes the largest number of criminals per resident; State's primary method of speeding up executions; United States Supreme Court decision to hear the appeal of death-row inmate Terry Williams for a 1985...

  • ATKINS V. VIRGINIA: THE NEED FOR CONSISTENT SUBSTANTIVE AND PROCEDURAL APPLICATION OF THE BAN ON EXECUTING THE INTELLECTUALLY DISABLED. Raffensperger, Kathryn // Denver University Law Review;2013, Vol. 90 Issue 3, p739 

    In 2002, the Supreme Court changed the landscape of Eighth Amendment jurisprudence in deciding Atkins v. Virginia. In Atkins, the Court prohibited the execution of intellectually disabled individuals. In doing so, however, the Court provided the states with very little guidance and left the...

  • Should John Penry Die? Orecklin, Michele; Hylton, Hilary // Time; 

    Discusses a stay of execution of John Penry by the United States Supreme Court. Confession of Penry to the murder of Pamela Moseley; Mental capacity of Penry; Debate over the execution of convicted adults who have the mentality of children; Number of states which bar the execution of the...

  • 'Not a suitable punishment' Simon, Roger // U.S. News & World Report;7/8/2002, Vol. 133 Issue 2, p9 

    Reports on the decision of the United States Supreme Court concerning limitations of the death penalty. Finding that the capital punishment is unsuitable for the mentally retarded; Case of Daryl Atkins; Issue of human rights; Outlook for prisoners awaiting execution.

  • Death Row Decisions. Goldstein, Lisa Fine // Education Week;10/9/2002, Vol. 22 Issue 6, p1 

    Reports on the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that the execution of mentally retarded people is unconstitutionally cruel and unusual punishment. Significance of the clinical decisions made about a criminal in school; Need for access to the child's special education records; Fear of the use of federal...

  • Eugenics Challenged in Skinner v. Oklahoma. Hadak, George // ABA Journal;Jun2009, Vol. 95 Issue 6, p72 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court case of 1927 regarding involuntary sterilization of criminals deemed as mentally retarded, and the developments taking place in the U.S. based on this decision in the following years. After the 1927 verdict, as reported, a politically powerful...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics