TITLE

Scientific Expertise

AUTHOR(S)
Punjabi, Prakash P.
PUB. DATE
September 2010
SOURCE
Perfusion;Sep2010, Vol. 25 Issue 5, p281
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
In this article, the author presents his views about the role of scientific and academic expertise in the creation of scientific publications. The author further says that the scientific community, the authors as well as readers, rely on these publications which can be original articles, case reports or reviews, to understand and improve clinical practice. Also, a scientific publication is a result of the hard work done by the author.
ACCESSION #
55177161

 

Related Articles

  • Introductory paragraph – Volume 26, Issue 12.  // Clinical Rehabilitation;Dec2012, Vol. 26 Issue 12, p1058 

    An introduction is presented in which the author discusses articles within the issue which focus on topics such as the revised Visual Analog Mood Scales, Vibration therapy for treatment of spasticity, and interferential light therapy as alternative to usual treatment for shoulder tendinopathy.

  • Audit of submissions: July 2010-June 2011. Black, Nick; Mays, Nicholas; Rivett-Carnac, Christine // Journal of Health Services Research & Policy;Jan2012, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p3 

    The author reflects on the submission of 131 unsolicited manuscripts, including original research and essays, from July 2010 to June 2011. He expresses his appreciation to the people who agreed to review the papers for the journal's 16th year. The people include Stephen Abbott, Joanne Abbotts,...

  • What to Be Thankful for at The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. Yoder-Wise, Patricia S. // Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing;Nov2010, Vol. 41 Issue 11, p483 

    People that the author would like to thank for assisting in the publication of the periodical "Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing" are mentioned.

  • Open access, predatory publishing and peer-review. FERNANDEZ-LLIMOS, Fernando // Pharmacy Practice (1886-3655);Jan-Mar2014, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p1 

    The author reflects on open access publishing, predatory publishing and peer review. He suggests that while the open access publishing was initiated to increase access to a wide variety of articles, concerns have been raised about publishers known as predatory publishers who became involved in...

  • xxx. Voight, Michael L.; Hoogenboom, Barbara J. // International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy;Oct2012, Vol. 7 Issue 5, p452 

    Manuscripts have been subjected to the peer review process prior to publication for over 300 years. Currently, the peer review process is used by almost all scientific journals, and The International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy is no exception. Scholarly publication is the means by which...

  • For the write reason. Shanahan, Daniel // Journal of Wound Care;Oct2012, Vol. 21 Issue 10, p467 

    The article reflects on the purpose of writing for publication. He states that writers publish to gain the personal achievement. He also presents two main reasons behind it are to keep the research on the memory of the people also to reach the research to a wider audience influencing changes in...

  • Letter from the Editor.  // Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal;Jan2011, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p3 

    The author discusses peer review of articles within the journal, manuscript submission, and publication plans for the journal.

  • CARE OF THE PROFESSIONAL VOICE. Peer Review in Publication. Sataloff, Robert T. // Journal of Singing;Sep/Oct2011, Vol. 68 Issue 1, p45 

    The article discusses a survey which was conducted in 2008 in an effort to investigate the attitudes that academics in several disciplines, who were either authors or editors, had about the status of peer review processes which are utilized in articles which are submitted for publication in...

  • Standards in the Face of Uncertainty. Mertens, Stephan; Baethge, Christopher // Deutsches Aerzteblatt International;12/24/2012, Vol. 109 Issue 51/52, p900 

    The author focuses on the peer review, a characteristic evaluation of scientific texts by researchers. He states that fair renumeration of scientists involved in peer reviewing costs 1.9 billions British pounds per annum. It discusses the process of peer review of an article and an electronic...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics