TITLE

Judge Not

AUTHOR(S)
Sullivan, Andrew
PUB. DATE
October 2000
SOURCE
New Republic;10/23/2000, Vol. 223 Issue 17, p8
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
Comments on the candidates for the U.S. Supreme Court justices of the presidential candidates, Al Gore and George W. Bush. Views of the author on Bush's endorsement for Antonin Scalia; Efforts of Bush to try to reverse the Roe v. Wade decision; Possible nominees of both presidential candidates; Defense of the Bush court about abortion rights; Temperament of Bush; Opinion of the author about the possible nominee of Bush.
ACCESSION #
3662428

 

Related Articles

  • Supreme Court. Byrd, David // National Journal;4/01/2000, Vol. 32 Issue 14, p1044 

    Examines where presidential candidates Al Gore and George W. Bush are positioning themselves in the issue of Supreme Court in the United States. Differences on the issues of vouchers to private schools; Bush's advocacy of prayer at public high school events; Gore's opposition to quotas;...

  • Election 2000: Time for A Supreme Decision.  // Glamour;Sep2000, Vol. 98 Issue 9, p234 

    Editorial. Focuses on the implication of justice selection for the United States Supreme Court to the civil rights law of the nation. Details on some of the damages done on legal abortion; Information on the preference of presidential candidates Al Gore and George W. Bush in selecting...

  • The Supremes In the Dock. Taylor Jr., Stuart // Newsweek;4/10/2000, Vol. 135 Issue 15, p48 

    Discusses how the balance of power in the United States Supreme Court may change after the 2000 presidential election. Rulings of the conservative-dominated court, including the rights of cities and states to ban nude dancing; Speculation that US Vice-President Al Gore could cement a liberal...

  • The 2000 Presidential Election. Goldman, Phyllis Barkas // Monkeyshines on the United States Presidents, Games, Puzzles & T;1990, p78 

    The 2000 Presidential election is one of the closest in American history. The day after the election, Vice-President Al Gore, the Democratic candidate, had won the popular vote by over 216,000 votes, with 49,260,111 votes. Texas Governor, George W. Bush, the Republican candidate, had 49,043,820...

  • THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING IN BUSH V. GORE: A RHETORIC OF INCONSISTENCY. Prosise, Theodore O.; Smith, Craig R. // Rhetoric & Public Affairs;Winter2001, Vol. 4 Issue 4, p605 

    This critique of the Supreme Court ruling in Bush v. Gore establishes judicial and political contexts to ground a critical reading of the text. It finds that a majority on the Court, and some dissenters, violated their previously established realms of legitimate linguistic possibilities to make...

  • The Legacy of Hanging Chads. Levine, Samantha // U.S. News & World Report;1/28/2008, Vol. 144 Issue 3, p45 

    The article looks at the controversial Florida voting recounts during the U.S. presidential election of 2000. The winner of the election, Al Gore or U.S. President George W. Bush, was disputed for 36 days while votes in the Florida counties of Palm Beach, Broward, Miami-Dade, and Volusia were...

  • The Right Arena.  // National Review;12/18/2000, Vol. 52 Issue 24, p14 

    The author reflects on the bitter and complex victory of George W. Bush in the U.S. presidential elections in 2000. No one thought that the Al Gore-George Bush presidential electoral contest would be turned over to the courts. Both sides have taken a legal route, Bush rolling the dice on the...

  • SUPREME COURT. Taylor Jr., Stuart // Newsweek;11/6/2000, Vol. 136 Issue 19, p37 

    Presents the issue of the United States Supreme Court in the 2000 U.S. presidential race between U.S. Vice President Al Gore and Texas Governor George W. Bush. View of Gore who would appoint liberal judges; Approach of Bush, which is strict construction; Ages of Supreme Court Justices as of...

  • WERE THERE ADEQUATE STATE GROUNDS IN BUSH v. GORE? Wells, Michael L. // Constitutional Commentary;Summer2001, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p403 

    Comments on the legal grounds of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in the 2000 presidential elections between George W. Bush and Al Gore. Error in the treatment of the plurality clause under Section II of the Constitution; Principles of federalism used by the court in its decision; Discussion of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics