TITLE

RU 4 Life

AUTHOR(S)
Sullivan, Andrew
PUB. DATE
October 2000
SOURCE
New Republic;10/16/2000, Vol. 223 Issue 16, p12
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
Comments on the debate involving the approval of RU-486, a pharmaceutical drug that induces abortion, by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Assertion of the similarity of killing an unborn fetus with that of murdering a full-grown human being; Impact of the drug's approval on the pro-choice movement; Citation of the capability of the drug to mimic natural, spontaneous abortion; Negation of the asserted contribution of the pill to induce an increasing number of abortions; Impact of the drug on the physical and emotional status of the woman who chose to take it.
ACCESSION #
3645223

 

Related Articles

  • THE LITTLE PILL THAT COULD. Friedman, Ann // American Prospect;Jan/Feb2007, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p17 

    The article considers the controversies surrounding the abortion pill mifepristone. Pro-choice groups are supporting studies on the drug's potential use to treat depression, cancer or reproductive system disorders. Mifepristone was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for...

  • Ban on Abortion Pill Challenged: Pregnant woman who tried to import drug loses first round in courts. Reske, Henry J. // ABA Journal;Oct92, Vol. 78 Issue 10, p24 

    Reports on the controversy arising from the importation of a dose of the abortion drug RU-486 by abortion rights supporters for use by a pregnant woman, Leona Benten, in the United States. Reasons of federal officials for seizing the drug; Lawsuit filed by Benten and abortion rights supporters...

  • Abortion drug approval opens up research. Cimons, Marlene // Nature Medicine;Nov2000, Vol. 6 Issue 11, p1196 

    Examines the implications of the approval of the abortion pill mifepristone for the study of the medical properties of the drug in the U.S. Effect of drug on uterine fibroid tumors; Drug efficacy.

  • Parliament Fails Australian Women — Abortion Drug Voted In.  // Australian Family;Jan/Feb2006, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p1 

    The article reports on the vote of the Australian Parliament to transfer jurisdiction over the approval of the abortifacient RU-486 from the Health Minister to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). It argues that since RU-486 is an abortifacient, the responsibility over its approval should...

  • The tell-tale ear. Shvartsman, Alex // Nature;10/18/2012, Vol. 490 Issue 7420, p440 

    The article presents questions and answers on various topics including the unapproved advertising knock-off pills by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), hypersonic advertisement of Telltale Marketing, and misdirected broadcast.

  • How we won abortion rights. Egan, Carolyn // Canadian Dimension;Mar/Apr98, Vol. 32 Issue 2, p17 

    Examines how the Canadian women's movement won abortion rights in 1988. Celebration of the tenth anniversary of the overturning of the federal abortion law; Formation of the Ontario Coalition for Abortion Clinics; Doctor Henry Morgentaler's establishment of a clinic in Winnipeg; Symbol of...

  • The scales of justice generally favor abortion rights. Rose, Joan R. // Medical Economics;3/11/96, Vol. 73 Issue 5, p15 

    Discusses the acceptance of abortion rights by several courts in the United States. Prohibition of abortion laws in Ohio and Indiana; Suits challenging the legality of state efforts to deny abortion coverage to some Medicaid recipients in Minnesota, Colorado and New Mexico.

  • A fable: `Pro-choice' in 1860. Leo, John // U.S. News & World Report;5/20/96, Vol. 120 Issue 20, p19 

    Offers a fable regarding pro-choice in 1860. Tent size, the biggest preconvention issue for the Republican Party; Slave ownership; Killing of babies by slave owners.

  • NOW: Mobilization for women's lives.  // Women's International Network News;Winter90, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p21 

    Reports that tens of thousands of pro-choice people rallied in Washington, D.C., on November 12, 1989, to celebrate political victories. Vow to redouble efforts in battles to come; Revenge at the ballot box against candidates who oppose freedom of choice in reproductive decisions.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics