Five Limiting Beliefs

Arthur, Jay
November 2008
Personal Excellence;Nov2008, Vol. 13 Issue 11, p5
The author reflects on different strategies to conquer limiting beliefs. He believes many have personal convictions that influence the achievement of personal success. He assures these points of view may be changed by consciously identifying the present situation. He explains the various ways in evaluating restrictive presumptions which include identifying the most common confining phrase, questioning one's beliefs and practicing the new philosophy.


Related Articles

  • Trust and Suspicion in Critical Thinking as Transcendence. Hendricks, Christina // Philosophy of Education Yearbook;2006, p295 

    An essay on critical thinking with trust and suspicion as transcendence is presented. Effective transcendence in critical thinking requires a degree of suspicion on one's views and methods of thinking as a motivation for distancing oneself from these in order to evaluate them. But it is also...

  • Kenntnis und Erkenntnis: Der innere Zusammenhang von Philosophiegeschichte und Geschichtsphilosophie. Hutter, Axel // Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch fur Antike und Mittelalter;2006, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p3 

    A specifically rational understanding of the philosophical tradition (»Erkenntnis«), which addresses the question of truth, is opposed to a purely historical understanding of philosophy (»Kenntnis«). Nevertheless this rational understanding of philosophy remains critically related to...

  • Pragmatist Doubt, Dogmatism and Bullshit. Macarthur, David // M/C Journal;2011, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p3 

    The article discusses the specific instances of the value of appropriate doubt. It argues that learning how to doubt, when to doubt, and what to doubt is at the heart of a powerful pragmatist approach to philosophy. It discusses two ways of thinking about doubt, outlines the pragmatist approach,...

  • Expressive Truth: An Argument for Literary Philosophy. Wahman, Jessica // Journal of Speculative Philosophy;2006, Vol. 20 Issue 2, p77 

    The article introduces a structure to identify literary philosophy as a form of truth-telling and to solidify its place as a form of philosophical approach. It accepts as a hypothesis George Santayana's ontological account of truth and his explanation of the inadequacy of human truth to its...

  • Le rôle des raisons et des causes dans le processus de l'argumentation. Gabor, Nicoleta // Scientific Bulletin of the Politehnica University of Timisoara. ;2002, Vol. 1 Issue 1/2, p27 

    The article shows that two major types of thinking (common thinking and positive or scientific thinking) interfere differently with the two extra-linguistic realities--reason and cause. Our research is based on the theory of argumentation. The notions of truth and cause operate in the field of...

  • OAKESHOTT AND THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF PHILOSOPHICAL POLITICS. Hall, Dale; Modood, Tariq // Political Studies;Jun82, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p157 

    Oakeshott offers a radical version of the thesis that philosophy cannot evaluate or recommend political ideas. We criticize each stage of his argument that practical life excludes philosophy's desire for ultimate truth and demands a distinctive form of reasoning. Believing that practice is not...

  • Kimo's Rules. Bintliff, Sharon Shay // Hawaii Medical Journal;Oct2003, Vol. 62 Issue 10, p215 

    Comments on Kimo's Rules, a set of rule that encourages positive thinking and truth. List of the rules; Questions raised regarding the rules; Effect of the rules on life.

  • Meme, Myself, and I. Freeman, Allen // American Scholar;Autumn2011, Vol. 80 Issue 4, p14 

    This article presents thoughts and questions on human self-perception from British documentary filmmaker Jonnie Hughes. He predicts that the 21st century will be one of psychological discovery. He asks how advances in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalograms (EEGs)...

  • Explaining the Quest and Its Prospects: Reply to Boghossian and Byrne. Stroud, Barry // Philosophical Studies;Mar2002, Vol. 108 Issue 1/2, p239 

    A brief description of the goal and main lines of argument of The Quest for Reality, in reply to the responses of Paul Boghossian and Alex Byrne.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics