TITLE

A Reflection on Furman

AUTHOR(S)
Higginbotham, Patrick E.
PUB. DATE
April 2007
SOURCE
American Journal of Criminal Law;Spring2007, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p199
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
The author ponders on the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Furman v. Georgia, which ruled on the requirement for a degree of consistency in the application of the death penalty. He believes death penalty generates interest in the coverage of federal review of state criminal convictions. He emphasizes that the declining role of the inferior federal courts on collateral review increases the need for Supreme Court review on direct appeal of claims of constitutional error in criminal convictions.
ACCESSION #
34757904

 

Related Articles

  • Death Rattles.  // Time;11/20/1972, Vol. 100 Issue 21, p72 

    The article focuses on efforts to reinstate capital punishment. It says that the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Furman v. Georgia that death penalty was unconstitutional was unclear. It notes that the nine Justices wrote their own opinion, while two Justices based their anti-death ruling on...

  • What One Hand Giveth, The Other Taketh Away: How Future Dangerousness Corrupts Guilt Verdicts and Produces Premature Punishment Decisions in Capital Cases. Vartkessian, Elizabeth S. // Pace Law Review;Mar2012, Vol. 32 Issue 2, p447 

    The article discusses capital punishment litigation in the U.S. as of March 2012, focusing on future dangerousness assessments and their impact on the judicial decisionmaking process and determinations of guilt. Bifurcated capital punishment trials are addressed, along with an examination of...

  • David Baldus and the Legacy of McCleskey v. Kemp. Gross, Samuel B. // Iowa Law Review;Oct2012 Special Issue, Vol. 97, p1905 

    The article discusses the importance of the U.S. Supreme Court case McCleskey v. Kemp and the work of professor David Baldus. It focuses on racial discrimination and the constitutional regulation of the death penalty in the U.S. In McCleskey case, the Supreme Court has rejected challenge to...

  • OUR BROKEN DEATH PENALTY. FLETCHER, WILLIAM A. // New York University Law Review;Jun2014, Vol. 89 Issue 3, p805 

    The article presents a speech entitled "Our Broken Death Penalty" by U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Judge William A. Fletcher which was delivered as the James Madison Lecture at the New York University School of Law on October 15, 2013. According to the article, the U.S. Supreme...

  • LIFE OR DEATH. Vogell, Heather; Rankin, Bill // IRE Journal;Mar/Apr2008, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p10 

    The article examines a story series written by legal affairs reporter Bill Rankin about the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision Furman v. Georgia, featured in the 1997 "The Atlanta Journal-Constitution." The decision reportedly abolished the death penalty due to its arbitrary use by the courts....

  • ARBITRARY DEATH: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF MITIGATION. Hughes, Emily // Washington University Law Review;2012, Vol. 89 Issue 3, p581 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court's view regarding the intersection of arbitrariness and mitigation in capital punishment decisions. It discusses the case Furman v. Georgia and presents empirical evidence from a quantitative study of thirty capital mitigation specialists who describe...

  • DESERVING OF LIFE: A MITIGATING FACTOR APPROACH TO THE NARROWING MANDATE IN CAPITAL SENTENCING. WANG, ANDY T. // Harvard Journal on Legislation;2015, Vol. 52 Issue 2, p509 

    The article explores a new legislative but court-driven approach to death penalty narrowing in the U.S. Topics discussed include decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in several cases related to capital punishment including Furman v. Georgia, Gregg v. Georgia and McGautha v. California, use of...

  • Furman v. Georgia.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Dynamic Court (1930-1999);1999, pN.PAG 

    Presents the case Furman v. Georgia argued before the United States Supreme Court. Opening statements; Decision of the Court; Closing comments by the judges.

  • LESSONS FOR LAW REFORM FROM THE AMERICAN EXPERIMENT WITH CAPITAL PUNISHMENT. STEIKER, CAROL S.; STEIKER, JORDAN M. // Southern California Law Review;Mar2014, Vol. 87 Issue 3, p733 

    The article discusses American law reform efforts in relation to the nation's capital punishment laws as of March 2014, focusing on the claim that the U.S. is the only Western democracy that still retains a death penalty punishment. America's rule-of-law values, alleged racial disparities in the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics