TITLE

Beware of Over-Interpreting Negative Trials

AUTHOR(S)
Scahill, Lawrence; Aman, Michael G.; McCracken, James T.; McDougle, Christopher J.; Vitiello, Benedetto
PUB. DATE
October 2008
SOURCE
Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders;Oct2008, Vol. 38 Issue 9, p1609
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the pragmatic trial which addresses a problem of clinical decision-making. In its pure form, a pragmatic trial would compare two evidence-based treatments to help clinicians in selecting which one should be selected first. By contrast, an efficacy trial is designed to determine whether a treatment is effective.
ACCESSION #
34614598

 

Related Articles

  • The Necessity of Randomized Clinical Trials. Jakobsen, Janus Christian; Gluud, Christian // British Journal of Medicine & Medical Research;Oct-Dec2013, Vol. 3 Issue 4, p1453 

    Aims: The hierarchy of evidence-based medicine determines the inferential powers of different clinical research designs. We want to address the difficult question if observational evidence under some circumstances can validate intervention effects. Methodology: Assessment of previous...

  • 'Placebos' and the logic of placebo comparison. Turner, Andrew // Biology & Philosophy;May2012, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p419 

    Robin Nunn has argued that we should stop using the terms 'placebo' and 'placebo effect'. I argue in support of Nunn's position by considering the logic of why we perform placebo comparisons. Like all comparisons, placebo comparison is just a case of comparing one thing with another, but it is a...

  • Evidence-Based Medicine and Levels of Evidence. Wallace, David K. // American Orthoptic Journal;2010, Vol. 60, p2 

    Evidence-based medicine is the practice of making medical decisions based on evidence gained from applying the scientific method. Published studies are evaluated using three key questions: "Are the results valid?"; "What are the results?"; and "Can the results be applied to my patients?" The...

  • Bringing Single-case Methodology into the Clinic to Enhance Evidence-based Practices. Tate, Robyn L.; Aird, Vanessa; Taylor, Christine // Brain Impairment;Dec2012, Vol. 13 Issue 3, p347 

    There are many challenges in incorporating an evidence-based approach into clinical practice and a large literature exists on various barriers and facilitators. Within this context, we have developed a framework to advocate an empirical approach to therapeutic interventions, using our Model to...

  • Is the QOF turning us into dangerous prescribers? Kendrick, Malcolm // Pulse;10/8/2008, Vol. 68 Issue 34, p26 

    The author discusses his sentiments on the shift from patient-led demand to healthcare-led intervention in which the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) is the final push towards the taking control of British government. This shift is mainly driven by the concept that prevention is better than...

  • 2009 - Applying evidence: What's the next action? (Editorial). Glasziou, Paul // ACP Journal Club;1/1/2009, Vol. 150 Issue 1, p1 

    The article presents the author's comments on the importance of identifying the next action in evidence-based medicine. It informs that linking of evidence-based medicine and quality improvement is important if researchers are to reap the improvements in clinical outcomes from good research. It...

  • Mangled Extremity - Case Report, Literature Review and Borderline Cases Guidelines Proposal. Bakota, Bore; Kopljar, Mario; Jurjevic, Zoran; Staresinic, Mario; Cvjetko, Ivan; Dobric, Ivan; De Faoite, Diarmuid // Collegium Antropologicum;Dec2012, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p1419 

    Treatment of a mangled lower extremity represents a major challenge. The decision whether to amputate or attempt reconstruction is currently based upon surgical evaluation. The aim of this paper is to propose a new approach to surgical evaluation based on scoring systems, local clinical status...

  • Developing Effective Research-Practice Partnerships for Creating a Culture of Evidence-Based Decision Making. Riemer, Manuel; Kelley, Susan; Casey, Susan; Taylor Haynes, Katherine // Administration & Policy in Mental Health & Mental Health Service;Jul2012, Vol. 39 Issue 4, p248 

    With growing evidence that treatment as usual may have limited effectiveness in mental health the pressure on service providers to be accountable and produce evidence as to the effectiveness of their services has increased. Measurement Feedback Systems, such as the Contextualized Feedback System...

  • Reducing the confusion and controversies around pragmatic trials: using the Cardiovascular Health Awareness Program (CHAP) trial as an illustrative example. Thabane, Lehana; Kaczorowski, Janusz; Dolovich, Lisa; Chambers, Larry W.; Mbuagbaw, Lawrence // Trials;9/2/2015, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p1 

    Knowledge translation (KT) involves implementation of evidence-based strategies and guidelines into practice to improve the process of care and health outcomes for patients. Findings from pragmatic trials may be used in KT to provide patients, healthcare providers and policymakers with...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics