Methodology and Statistical Review: A New Dimension for The Journal

Heckman, James D.
December 2007
Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;Dec2007, Vol. 89-A Issue 12, p2581
Academic Journal
The article discusses the changes in the periodical's methodology and statistical review. The periodical has established a new step in the manuscript review process to relieve the content reviewers from the responsibility of evaluating the methodology and statistics of each submitted study and to ensure a standard high level of proficiency in this arena.


Related Articles

  • Coping with the journal review process. Sengupta, Tapan K. // Current Science (00113891);5/10/2007, Vol. 92 Issue 9, p1208 

    The author reflects on peer-review in scholarly periodicals. He notes that such review is flawed due to inability of reviewers to provide objective reviews because of their vested interest. He cites the advantages of an open-review process. He argues that the blind review process discourages...

  • Reviewers and reviewing. Klemeš, Jiří // Clean Technologies & Environmental Policy;Aug2014, Vol. 16 Issue 6, p987 

    The author reflects on the problem about the lack of willing reviewers to address the demands of peer-reviewed journals. He points out the existence of statistical systems for quantifying a publication's influence, and at the same time recognizes its pros and cons. He elaborates on the concept...

  • Potential Bias in Editorial Peer Review: A Study of U.S. Medical Journals. Weller, Ann C. // Future of Serials: Proceedings of the North American Serials Int;1991, Vol. 19 Issue 3/4, p95 

    The article investigates the potential for introducing bias by not reviewing all manuscripts based on a study of U.S. medical journals. One way in which the editor adds bias to a journal is by soliciting manuscripts. There was on eighty-eight percent chance that a manuscript would be accepted...

  • End of the peer review show? Henderson, Mark // BMJ: British Medical Journal (Overseas & Retired Doctors Edition;4/3/2010, Vol. 340 Issue 7749, p738 

    The article investigates the effectiveness of peer review in ensuring the quality of published research. It discusses several high profile cases involving works of researchers published in scientific journals that exposed the limitations of the peer review process. It cites reasons for the...

  • Peer Review and Legal Publishing: What Law Librarians Need to Know about Open, Single-Blind, and Double-Blind Reviewing. Mccormack, Nancy // Law Library Journal;Winter2009, Vol. 101 Issue 1, p59 

    The article discusses peer review in legal publishing. The author addresses the differences between open reviewing, single-blind reviewing, and double-blind reviewing, specifically focusing on the ways in which they are changing legal publishing. The definitions of the aforementioned peer review...

  • He told me so... Verdonk, René // Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy;Dec2008, Vol. 16 Issue 12, p1065 

    The author offers opinions on the editing of this publication. He states that when his predecessor, the founder of the publication, said that the job entailed much work, he was guilty of understatement. The author thanks his immediate staff for their contributions, and describes several...

  • An Inside Look at the Professional School Counseling Review Process. Auger, Richard W. // Professional School Counseling;Feb2008, Vol. 11 Issue 3, pii 

    In this article the author, the editor of the journal, discusses the process whereby scholarly articles are reviewed by the author's peer experts in a given field in advance of publication. In addition, he raises a number of issues that might clarify the process of getting article published in...

  • FROM THE EDITORS: WHEN IS A "NEW" PAPER REALLY NEW? Ireland, R. Duane // Academy of Management Journal;Feb2009, Vol. 52 Issue 1, p9 

    The article presents strategies for dealing with a rejection notice from a scholarly journal when submitting a piece to be reviewed for publication. The author discusses how the process works at the Academy of Management Journal and notes that rejections, while they can be disappointing to an...

  • Scientific Writing, Peer Review, and Turning Lemons Into Lemonade. Stichler, Jaynelle F. // Health Environments Research & Design Journal (HERD) (Vendome Gr;Winter2009, Vol. 2 Issue 2, p70 

    The article explains the concept of peer review, which refers to the process of sending a submitted manuscript stripped of author identifiers to a panel of reviewers expert in the area of the manuscript. The author says peer review may not be a common term for practitioners in design, nursing,...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics