TITLE

Liberal free-speech hypocrisy

AUTHOR(S)
Keene, David
PUB. DATE
September 2007
SOURCE
Hill;9/25/2007, Vol. 14 Issue 110, p41
SOURCE TYPE
Newspaper
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
The author reflects on the problem of liberal free speech in the U.S. which notes that majority of America's liberals no longer believe others. He argues that everyone believes in his own right to protection under the First Amendment, but few seem willing to come to defense of those they find tacky, obnoxious or wrong. He states that the ranks of the most overt rhetorical champions of free speech include some who are perfectly willing to stand up for those they agree.
ACCESSION #
26996078

 

Related Articles

  • Letters@usnews.com. JAMES, JACK; GIBSON, RICHARD; GOLDISH, ROBERT; RIBACK, STEVEN; STONE, JACK; BRITT, JIM; DILL, GEORGE; STEPHAN, BOB; ALSTON, JIM // U.S. News Digital Weekly;10/15/2010, Vol. 2 Issue 41, p19 

    Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues including "Lay Off the Attacks on Elites," by Robert Schlesinger in the October 1, 2010 issue and the column "Editor's Note" in the October 8, 2010 issue.

  • Actually, Senators, You're the Ones Who Threaten the Country. Harsanyi, David // Hit & Run;9/1/2014, p9 

    The author discusses political and social issues in the U.S. as of September 2014, particularly the efforts by U.S. Senators Tom Udall and Bernie Sanders to repeal the First Amendment. He claims that the right to free speech should not be proportionate to political power. Also cited are the...

  • Free Speech and Double Standards. Taylor Jr., Stuart // National Journal;9/29/2007, Vol. 39 Issue 37, p21 

    The article focuses on the censorship of less liberal figures by the University of California in Irvine. The invitation of Former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers to speak to the university's Board of Regents was derailed by politically correct faculty mob. It notes the double standard that...

  • Government Speech. Curran Jr, J. Joseph // Supreme Court Debates;Feb2009, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p7 

    An excerpt from a report by Maryland Attorney General J. Joseph Curran Jr. on October 2, 2001 regarding the provision of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibiting Congress of making law abridging the freedom of speech is presented.

  • The First Amendment's Purpose. Rubenfeld, Jed // Stanford Law Review;Apr2001, Vol. 53 Issue 4, p767 

    Focuses on the purpose of the First Amendment in the free speech law of the United States. Background of the problem and the solution to be considered; Structural implication of purposivism; How purposivism yields answers to specific First Amendment questions.

  • The Constitution in 2000. Moss, Debra Cassens // ABA Journal;Apr91, Vol. 77 Issue 4, p40 

    Informs on an American Bar Association discussion called 'The Future of the Bill of Rights: Tomorrow, 2000 and Beyond,' conducted during the 1991 midyear meeting of the association. Free-speech rights of computer users; Application of the U.S. bill of rights to government use of sophisticated...

  • What to do about the First Amendment. Bork, Robert H. // Commentary;Feb95, Vol. 99 Issue 2, p23 

    Discusses the issue involving the provisions of the First Amendment. Prohibition of school prayer, Bible reading and moment of silence; Establishment clause; Aversion to connection between government and religion; Speech and press clauses; Special claim to protection of political speech; Speech...

  • Speaking of free speech... Will, George F. // Newsweek;7/8/1996, Vol. 128 Issue 2, p74 

    Opinion. Suggests that the status of freedom of expression is mixed and that the scope of that freedom has never been wider. Campaign to restrict political speech, the speech that is central to democratic life; Rhode Island law banning price advertising of alcoholic beverages; Ruling regarding...

  • The Supreme Court's approach to the First Amendment in cyberspace: Free speech as technology's... Kende, Mark S. // Constitutional Commentary;Winter97, Vol. 14 Issue 3, p465 

    Examines the effect of cyberspace on how the US Supreme Court views the First Amendment. `Technology-driven' First Amendment; Constitutionality of three provisions of a federal law regulating cable television in Denver, Colorado; Legal analysis of the Denver case; Case involving the American...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics