TITLE

What you see not always what they got

AUTHOR(S)
Mellman, Mark S.
PUB. DATE
September 2007
SOURCE
Hill;9/19/2007, Vol. 14 Issue 107, p22
SOURCE TYPE
Newspaper
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
The author reflects on the questionable poll results that monitor particularly on the candidates in the U.S. election. He argues that in examining poll results, one should assume the data has probably been subjected to some demographic weighting. The author emphasizes that there will a possibility that poll readers cannot be certain the results they see bear any resemblance to the numbers the pollster got.
ACCESSION #
26746243

 

Related Articles

  • Pollsters as much a part of the hoopla as the candidates. Honomichl, Jack // Marketing News;8/17/1992, Vol. 26 Issue 17, p9 

    The article comments on pollsters as a dominant presence during the political season in the U.S. in 1992. Election time is not only a busy time for political candidates but for political pollsters as well. They are in demand and will be in the media, predicting how people will vote. Well-funded...

  • How to Bet the 1978 Elections. Bode, Ken // New Republic;11/4/78, Vol. 179 Issue 19, p11 

    Presents tips on which American congressional and gubernatorial candidates to bet on for the 1978 elections. Sources of information on the election prospects of candidates, such as pollsters, insider political newsletters and political consultants; Estimation of probable voter turnout; Finding...

  • Movers & Shakers.  // Politics (Campaigns & Elections);May2010, Vol. 31 Issue 5, p18 

    An interview with Kristen Soltis, director of policy research for The Winston Group is presented. When asked about the factors that will get Winston Group's poll on the electorate, Soltis mentions right timing and resources. She emphasizes that national parties should work on the policy side to...

  • TESTING THE PERMANENCE OF THE PERMANENT CAMPAIGN. Tenpas, Kathryn Dunn; Mccann, James A. // Public Opinion Quarterly;Fall2007, Vol. 71 Issue 3, p349 

    Many presidential observers argue that the modem White House is the site of more-or-less permanent campaigning. In a recent POQ piece, Murray and Howard (2002) [Public Opinion Quarterly 66:527-558] explore one indicator of the "permanent campaign," the extent to which Presidents Carter, Reagan,...

  • The Expectation: Dean, Then Gephardt.  // National Journal;1/17/2004, Vol. 36 Issue 3, preceding p146 

    Presents political expectations and forecasts for Democratic presidential candidates in the U.S. as of January 2004. Rank of successful candidates in terms of their chances of winning the nomination.

  • EVANS & NOVAK. Novak, Robert // Human Events;10/4/2004, Vol. 60 Issue 34, p10 

    Predicts the result of the 2004 U.S. election. Chance of the Democrats to gain majority seats in the U.S. Congress; Reason for choosing U.S. Housing Secretary Mel Martinez over former Representative Bill McCollum to run for office in Florida; Result of a Rasmussen poll in South Dakota as of...

  • Insiders Betting On Dean. Barnes, James A.; Mahtesian, Charles // National Journal;10/25/2003, Vol. 35 Issue 43, p3252 

    Discusses the results of a Democratic Insider Poll by the "National Journal" on the presidential candidate who would likely to clinch a Democratic Party nomination for 2004. Segments of the race for the Democratic nomination; Background on the Democrats who participated in the poll; Assessment...

  • Early presidential handicappers are clueless. Kremer, Jerry // Long Island Business News (7/1993 to 5/2009);4/27/2007, Vol. 54 Issue 18, p15A 

    The author reflects on the early predictions released by handicappers concerning the candidate to win for the 2008 presidential election in the U.S. He argues that the forecasted result of the winning president in the race appears to be unreliable. The author stresses that various presidential...

  • KENTUCKY. A. B. // Hill;5/1/2008, Vol. 15 Issue 50, p18 

    The article reports on a new SurveyUSA poll between businessperson Greg Fischer and former gubernatorial candidate Bruce Lunsford in the Democratic Senate. Fischer trail is still 43-18 compared to Lunsford that got 47-9 in the same poll. The poll was conducted during Fischer advertisement attack...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics