TITLE

The Hartford Tourant

PUB. DATE
June 2007
SOURCE
Hill;6/6/2007, Vol. 14 Issue 66, p28
SOURCE TYPE
Newspaper
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
The author reflects on the ruling of the 1964 Civil Rights Act by the U.S. Supreme Court. He stresses that the ruling ignored the intent of the law and the precedent-setting cases of the past, and the realities in the workplace, where the salaries of employees are typically kept confidential. He illustrates the case of Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.'s area manager Lilly Ledletter as she was earning up to 40% less than her male counterparts after her 19 years of employment.
ACCESSION #
25413867

 

Related Articles

  • Stay diligent in regard to following employment law. Andrews, Joan M. // Enterprise/Salt Lake City;7/15/2013, Vol. 42 Issue 48, pF4 

    The article discusses U.S. Supreme Court decisions in 2012-13 which alter the employment law landscape. Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, employees are protected from discrimination on the basis of race, religion or sex. The cases of University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v....

  • Statutory Construction of the Title VII and 42 USC 1983 in Employment Discrimination Actions. Brierton, Thomas D. // Labor Law Journal;Mar89, Vol. 40 Issue 3, p158 

    The article explains the overlap between Title VII of the U.S. Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 USC 1983. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 allows an employee a private cause of action for discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin against private and...

  • Employment testing and discrimination in the post-Ricci era.  // HR Specialist: Ohio Employment Law;Feb2010, Vol. 4 Issue 2, p7 

    The article focuses on the federal and state laws towards administering employment tests. It details several employment laws including the Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Employment Act on age discrimination which allow employers to make job-related tests. It presents the case...

  • Worthier Than Thou. Kinsley, Michael // New Republic;6/27/81, Vol. 184 Issue 26, p10 

    Presents information on the workplace discrimination in the U.S. Rejection of an interpretation of the civil rights laws by the U.S. Supreme Court; Report that the workplace discrimination has evolved into a lucrative blackmail racket for many entrepreneurs of litigation; Demand for the equal...

  • Court Rules on Back Pay, Tests.  // Labor Law Journal;Sep75, Vol. 26 Issue 9, p606 

    The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that an employer's good-faith efforts to comply with the requirements for rendering equal employment opportunity cannot be used to defend against a claim for back pay. The seniority system in this case was perpetuating the effects of...

  • Divided Supreme Court Limits Scope of Pay Discrimination Claims Under Title VII.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2007 Q2, p1 

    The article focuses on the decision released by the U.S. Supreme Court regarding the statute of limitations applicable to pay discrimination claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 according to the case Ledbetter versus Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. The Court has held that a charge...

  • The Hidden Impact of Wards Cove. Preer Jr., Robert M. // Labor Law Journal;Jan90, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p45 

    The article scrutinizes the implications of the Supreme Court case Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Antonio. It involved the employment practices of two companies, represented by Wards Cove Packing Co., that operate salmon canneries in Alaska. The original 1974 complaint claimed that the companies had...

  • Arbitrability, Preemption, and Preclusion: Developing Issues in Age Discrimination Claims. Shearer, Robert A. // Labor Law Journal;May92, Vol. 43 Issue 5, p313 

    This article focuses on the importance of U.S. Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 to discrimination claims against employers. The federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) 1967 generally protects workers over 40 from adverse action by employers because of age. Prominent...

  • whose rights were trampled? Kinard, Jerry; Kinard, Brian R. // Supervision;Jun2005, Vol. 66 Issue 6, p3 

    Examines the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case, General Dynamics Land Systems versus Cline, which involves age discrimination in employment. Background of the case; Provisions of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967; Specifics of the case; Implications of the law to the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics