TITLE

Take Decency Off FCC's Hands

AUTHOR(S)
Lane, Frederick
PUB. DATE
October 2006
SOURCE
Multichannel News;10/23/2006, Vol. 27 Issue 42, p21
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
The article reflects on the author's view regarding the jurisdiction of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) over broadcast indecency in the U.S. He cited that the FCC indecency jurisdiction has shifted to protecting children from hearing inappropriate broadcasts. He noted that indecency standard of the said agency is both vague and erratically enforced.
ACCESSION #
24978230

 

Related Articles

  • Drafting the Draft: Net Neutrality Still to Come in Stevens' Bill.  // CableFAX Daily;6/13/2006, Vol. 17 Issue 114, p1 

    Reports on the revised telecommunication bill introduced by Senator Ted Stevens in June 2006. Implication of the bill for the cable industry; Companies affected by the revised bill; Information on the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's rule on broadcasting.

  • Broadcast License Auctions and the Demise of Public Interest Regulation. Zlotlow, David Seth // California Law Review;May2004, Vol. 92 Issue 3, p887 

    Using auctions to distribute broadcast licenses is one of the most exciting policy innovations in the history of broadcast regulation. Theoretically, auctions address many of the problems associated with allocating access to the broadcast spectrum. Auctions allow licenses to be distributed based...

  • FCC stresses emergency information obligation. Martin, Harry C. // Broadcast Engineering;May2005, Vol. 47 Issue 5, p24 

    Discusses the decision of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission to penalize three San Diego, California television stations with fines ranging from $20,000 to $25,000 for failure to make emergency information accessible to people with hearing disabilities in 2005. Reminder issued by the...

  • Dateline.  // Broadcast Engineering;May2005, Vol. 47 Issue 5, p24 

    Presents a dateline on the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's requirement for broadcasters in 2005. June 1, 2005 deadline for television, LPTV, Class A and TV translator stations in Michigan and Ohio to file their 2005 renewal applications, biennial ownership reports and EEO program...

  • THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE: A FLAWED MEANS TO ATTAIN A NOBLE GOAL. Ammori, Marvin // Administrative Law Review;Fall2008, Vol. 60 Issue 4, p881 

    The article discusses the concept of the Fairness Doctrine which was implemented by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and was repealed in 1987. The Fairness Doctrine was enacted to require broadcasters to devote a reasonable time to the coverage of public issues. Although there...

  • THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE: BENEFITS AND COSTS. Mullally, Donald P. // Public Opinion Quarterly;Winter69-Winter70, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p577 

    Dr. Mullally, who is Assistant Professor of Radio and Television in the College of Communications, University of Illinois, and is completing his law degree at the University of Michigan, examines the potential consequences of the new fairness rules adopted by the Federal Communications...

  • regulation. Case, Tony // MediaWeek;1/1/2007, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p16 

    This article discusses U. S. Federal media regulation during January of 2007. The article notes that the U. S. Federal Communication Commission (FCC) may be affected by a new Democratic Party-controlled congress, and the author speculates that the new Congress may limit efforts by the FCC to...

  • Indecency fine hike likely. Boliek, Brooks // Hollywood Reporter -- International Edition;2/8/2005, Vol. 387 Issue 40, p6 

    The article reports that legislation, which would exponentially increase fines for smutty broadcasts, is expected to clear a key hurdle as the U.S. House Commerce Committee plans to vote on the bill. In the last U.S. Congress, the bill won committee approval with only one dissenting vote....

  • Your Records, Please. Walker, Jesse // Reason;Oct2004, Vol. 36 Issue 5, p14 

    Reports on a proposed regulation by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission in 2004 requiring broadcasters to retain records of all their programs. Reasons behind the proposal; Goal of the commission; Impact of the requirement on independent stations.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics