Some relief for expert witnesses

Marcovitch, H.
February 2007
Archives of Disease in Childhood;Feb2007, Vol. 92 Issue 2, p102
Academic Journal
The author reflects on the court's judgment on the appeal of the General Medical Council (GMC) regarding the finding of serious professional misconduct (SPM) to professor Roy Meadow in Great Britain. He asserts that the judgment is of enormous importance for any pediatrician who proposes to give expert evidence. The author also provides a brief background of the case.


Related Articles

  • Meadow case: GMC may appeal.  // Pulse;3/9/2006, Vol. 66 Issue 10, p12 

    The article reports that the General Medical Council (GMC) will seek permission to appeal against a British High Court ruling which protects medical expert witnesses from disciplinary action. The GMC reacted to the decision in the case of pediatrician professor Roy Meadow. The council believes...

  • Meadow should never have been brought before the GMC. Dyer, Clare // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);2/25/2006, Vol. 332 Issue 7539, p439 

    The article discusses a ruling by Justice Collins, a senior judge at the High Court in London, to protect doctors who give honest evidence in court. The case of retired paediatrician Roy Meadow, who was found guilty of serious professional misconduct, is given. As a witness in a case of...

  • The GMC: out of its depth? Godlee, Fiona // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);7/30/2005, Vol. 331 Issue 7511, preceding p245 

    Focuses on the General Medical Council (GMC) in England. Attitude of physicians about the GMC; Loss of faith in the abilities of the GMC to manage affairs; Problem of underinvestigation of research fraud by the GMC; Articles in this issue that focus on the GMC and its ruling of Roy Meadow; Need...

  • Silencing Hired Guns. Harris, Craig // Canadian Underwriter;May2011, Vol. 78 Issue 5, p20 

    The article discusses the new court rule in Ontario in relation to getting expert witnesses specifically in cases that involve medical diagnoses. The change in the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure began in January 2010 and involves revamped duties of experts under Rule 53.03 where experts are...

  • The Podiatrist as an Expert Witness. Manning, Lloyd R. // Podiatry Management;Mar2008, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p143 

    The article discusses a variety of issues relevant to podiatrists who will stand as expert witnesses in the U.S. As an expert witness, podiatrists are called to provide facts and testimony in cases related to medical practice including medical malpractice, tort and negligence. This requires the...

  • Delay to expert witness review adds to Meadow verdict worries. Carson, Gordon // Community Care;7/21/2005, Issue 1582, p6 

    Reports on the delay in a review of the role of expert witnesses in family courts in Great Britain in 2005. Information on the charges filed against pediatrician Sir Roy Meadow; Involvement of Sir Liam Donaldson in the review; Overview of a new scheme that aims to improve investigations into...

  • EXPERT EVIDENCE ON TRIAL.  // Community Care;7/3/2003, Issue 1479, p5 

    Editorial. Comments on the credibility of professor Sir Roy Meadow in giving expert evidence in court which suggested that children were victims of murder rather than cot deaths. Reason discrediting his evidence in the case of Trupti Patel in Great Britain.

  • Doubts emerge over expert witness.  // Community Care;7/3/2003, Issue 1479, p6 

    Reports on the pressure facing the British government to set up a review of care proceedings cases in which child abuse expert professor Sir Roy Meadow has given expert evidence. Action taken by Member of Parliament Vera Baird in response to the issue; Factor that led to a review of Meadow's...

  • Doctors must stay within their competence when giving evidence. Dyer, Clare // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);2/10/2007, Vol. 334 Issue 7588, p276 

    The author focuses on draft guidelines issued by Great Britain's General Medical Council concerning physicians acting as expert witnesses in court. They address the issue of doctors remaining within the limits of their professional competence. The guidelines follow a controversy over misleading...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics