TITLE

Foreword

AUTHOR(S)
Roberts, Casey
PUB. DATE
August 2006
SOURCE
Ecology Law Quarterly;2006, Vol. 33 Issue 3, p511
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
The author reflects on the 2005 Annual Review of Environmental Law in this issue. Included are two cases that put states against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) over the Clean Air Act interpretation; a group of decisions on citizen participation and enforcement in hazardous materials and water resources and three decisions from the U. S. Supreme Court on eminent domain and takings.
ACCESSION #
23498053

 

Related Articles

  • Examining the Public Use Doctrine and Whether Expanding a Private University is a Public Use.  // BYU Journal of Public Law;2011, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p169 

    The article emphasizes whether expanding a private university can be a public use in the U.S. It highlights the court cases Kaur v. New York State Urban Development Corp. and Kelo v. City of New London. It explores the eminent domain law in these cases and describes the facts and holdings in...

  • Supreme Court Cases.  // Congressional Digest;Jan2006, Vol. 85 Issue 1, p9 

    The article presents information on certain U.S. Supreme Court cases related to the issue of eminent domain. The U.S. Supreme Court on June 23, 2005, in the "Kelo V. City of New London" case legalizes the capacity of cities to take the property of people by eminent domain. A city has the power...

  • Twelve little words. Wolpin, Bill // American City & County;Nov2004, Vol. 119 Issue 12, p8 

    Comments on a U.S. Supreme Court case involving the local government in New London, Connecticut and a resident who owns one of the home the city wants to take. Crux of the eminent domain controversy surrounding the case; Impact of a 1954 Supreme Court decision on the ability of local...

  • Notes and Recent Decisions. Ware, Stanton G.; Nichols, Roger J.; LemMon, Richard T.; Sparks, John E.; Minor, William O.; Landis, Harold E.; Kirkham, James F. // California Law Review;Oct56, Vol. 44 Issue 4, p775 

    Presents an update on legal issues and court decisions in the U.S. as of October 1956. Reasonableness of classification for purposes of zoning; Wire tapping with consent to obtain evidence; Right of eminent domain by a private person.

  • Comment on Recent Cases. J. C. A.; M. C. B.; W. C. J.; H. C. K.; Farmer, Milton T.; E. J. S.; M. C. L.; T. A. J. D.; A. M. K.; R. W. M.; W. E. C.; S. R. S.; M. K. W. // California Law Review;Jul14, Vol. 2 Issue 5, p401 

    Comments on various court cases, which addressed various legal issues in the U.S. Capacity of a convict to contract; Conflict of laws on the action by foreign administrator for wrongful death; Aesthetic principles for the regulation of crematories under the police power; Extent of the power of...

  • Comment. Abercrombie, James K.; Gendel, Martin // California Law Review;Sep31, Vol. 19 Issue 6, p626 

    Presents several court decisions in the U.S. as of September 1931. Facts of the case Sutro Heights Land Co. v. Merced Irrigation District, on the grant of easements in eminent domain; Case illustrating joint liability for entire damages.

  • A 'Supremely' Bad Decision. Czurak, David // Grand Rapids Business Journal;10/3/2005, Vol. 23 Issue 41, p7 

    Reports on the issues surrounding the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Kelo versus City of New London, Connecticut, which concerns the application of eminent domain. Implications of the decision for eminent domain implementation; Details of the case; Overview of a letter sent by...

  • RECONSIDERING POLETOWN: IN THE WAKE OF KELO, STATES SHOULD MOVE TO RESTORE PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS. Liles, Brett D. // Arizona Law Review;Summer2006, Vol. 48 Issue 2, p369 

    The article comments on the decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court concerning eminent domain. The U.S. Supreme Court should provide more protection on the right or the citizen to keep their property and should limit the scope of public use as a basis for the government to take private property....

  • Task force to study eminent domain.  // Hudson Valley Business Journal;12/12/2005, Vol. 16 Issue 24, p24 

    The article informs that New York State Bar Association has appointed a task force to provide legal analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court decision on eminent domain issue in Kelo v. New London. The task force will make recommendations about appropriate legislative and regulatory considerations. The...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics