TITLE

The agony and the ecstasy of the peer-Review process

AUTHOR(S)
Nayak, Barun K.; Maniar, Ranjit; Moreker, Sunil; Nayak, Barun Kumar
PUB. DATE
September 2005
SOURCE
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology;Sep2005, Vol. 53 Issue 3, p153
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
editorial
ABSTRACT
Comments on the importance of the peer-review process to the "Indian Journal of Ophthalmology." Purpose of the process; Models of the review process; Ethical principles that should be followed by reviewers.
ACCESSION #
18314899

 

Related Articles

  • Out With the Old; in With the New. Kalantar Motamedi, Mohammad Hosein // Kowsar Medical Journal;Winter2012, Vol. 16 Issue 4, p153 

    An introduction is presented in which the editor introduces the journal "Trauma Monthly" (TM) to replace the old "Kowsar Medical Journal" (KMJ), encourages submission of research articles for peer reviews and publication, and thanks the journal team for unpholding international standards.

  • JAMA Peer Reviewers in 2004.  // JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association;3/2/2005, Vol. 293 Issue 9, p1125 

    Presents a list of people who were peer reviewers who completed manuscript reviews in 2004 for the "Journal of the American Medical Association. List of names.

  • JAMA Peer Reviewers in 2004.  // JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association;3/2/2005, Vol. 293 Issue 9, p1125 

    Presents a list of people who were peer reviewers who completed manuscript reviews in 2004 for the "Journal of the American Medical Association. List of names.

  • Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors. Resnik, David; Elmore, Susan // Science & Engineering Ethics;Feb2016, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p169 

    A growing body of literature has identified potential problems that can compromise the quality, fairness, and integrity of journal peer review, including inadequate review, inconsistent reviewer reports, reviewer biases, and ethical transgressions by reviewers. We examine the evidence concerning...

  • Viewing the Peer Review Process Darkly and Face to Face. Broadhead, Geoffrey D. // Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly;Oct1986, Vol. 3 Issue 4, p289 

    The article discusses the peer review process and the Viewpoint section of the "Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly." The author refers to, and adds to, ideas conveyed in a paper by Dr. McGuire which also appeared in the Viewpoint section. The peer review process is described, analyzed, and...

  • Access for Contributors: PLoS Expands Options for Publication of Research and Comment. Editors, The PLoS Medicine // PLoS Medicine;Sep2006, Vol. 3 Issue 9, pe416 

    This article reports on the decision of the magazine "PLoS Medicine" to expand options for publication of research and comments. Like other journals, the editors at the magazine have ultimately to make subjective decisions about which papers they accept. Papers published by the magazine will be...

  • Peer Review and Publication Standards in Social Work Journals: The Miami Statement.  // Social Work Research;Jun2005, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p119 

    This article discusses trends in peer review and publication standards in social work journals. Some scholars in the profession argue that accomplished authors do not submit their best papers to social work journals, because they believe social work journals have limited impact. Certain journals...

  • COMMENTS. Stryker, Sheldon; Simon, Rita James; Lindsey, Duncan; Hughes, Helen Macgill; Bohrnstedt, George W. // American Sociologist;Nov79, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p238 

    The section comments on an article about the editorial review process of general sociology journals. Sheldon Stryker argues that no one can deny the considerable, perhaps even rampant, dissatisfaction among sociologists with the review process for journal publication. Nor can anyone with...

  • REJOINDER. Freese, Lee // American Sociologist;Nov79, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p244 

    The article presents the author's response to criticisms against his article on changes in some role relationships in the editorial review process of general sociology journals. Some of these concerns are well founded. We can all agree it would be unwise for ASA journals or for independent...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of NEW JERSEY STATE LIBRARY

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics