TITLE

The Agony and the Ecstasy of the Peer-review Process

AUTHOR(S)
Nayak, Barun K.; Maniar, Ranjit; Moreker, Sunil
PUB. DATE
September 2005
SOURCE
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology;Sep2005, Vol. 53 Issue 3, p153
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
Comments on the importance of the peer-review process to the "Indian Journal of Ophthalmology." Purpose of the process; Models of the review process; Ethical principles that should be followed by reviewers.
ACCESSION #
18314899

 

Related Articles

  • JAMA Peer Reviewers in 2004.  // JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association;3/2/2005, Vol. 293 Issue 9, p1125 

    Presents a list of people who were peer reviewers who completed manuscript reviews in 2004 for the "Journal of the American Medical Association. List of names.

  • JAMA Peer Reviewers in 2004.  // JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association;3/2/2005, Vol. 293 Issue 9, p1125 

    Presents a list of people who were peer reviewers who completed manuscript reviews in 2004 for the "Journal of the American Medical Association. List of names.

  • Ensuring the Quality, Fairness, and Integrity of Journal Peer Review: A Possible Role of Editors. Resnik, David; Elmore, Susan // Science & Engineering Ethics;Feb2016, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p169 

    A growing body of literature has identified potential problems that can compromise the quality, fairness, and integrity of journal peer review, including inadequate review, inconsistent reviewer reports, reviewer biases, and ethical transgressions by reviewers. We examine the evidence concerning...

  • REJOINDER. Freese, Lee // American Sociologist;Nov79, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p244 

    The article presents the author's response to criticisms against his article on changes in some role relationships in the editorial review process of general sociology journals. Some of these concerns are well founded. We can all agree it would be unwise for ASA journals or for independent...

  • COMMENTS. Stryker, Sheldon; Simon, Rita James; Lindsey, Duncan; Hughes, Helen Macgill; Bohrnstedt, George W. // American Sociologist;Nov79, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p238 

    The section comments on an article about the editorial review process of general sociology journals. Sheldon Stryker argues that no one can deny the considerable, perhaps even rampant, dissatisfaction among sociologists with the review process for journal publication. Nor can anyone with...

  • Peer Review - The Newcomers' Perspective. Mainguy, Gaell; Motamedi, Mohammad R.; Mietchen, Daniel // PLoS Biology;Sep2005, Vol. 3 Issue 9, p1534 

    Reports on the need to improve the peer-review process in scientific publications. Debate on how to implement the process; Criticism of the single-blind peer review; Policies that have been proposed to eliminate bias from the peer-review process; Importance of maintaining the trust within the...

  • PEER REVIEW CLARIFICATION. Zucca, Costanza // Biologist;Dec2013/Jan2014, Vol. 60 Issue 6, p53 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "The Journals They Are A-Changin" by Eva Amsen.

  • Quantified: Peer review.  // Nature;6/8/2006, Vol. 441 Issue 7094, pxiii 

    The article examines the peer-review process of the periodical "Nature." The periodical's Web debate gathers opinions from key people to examine current systems and viable alternatives to the peer-review process. The periodical's peer-review process enables authors to post submissions on a...

  • 2008–2009 Peer Reviewers.  // Ethics & International Affairs;2009, Vol. 23 Issue 4, p437 

    A list of peer reviewers for the journal "Ethics & International Affairs" is presented, which includes Chris Brown, Paula Casal and David Clark.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics