Barnard, Richard C.
February 2004
Sea Power;Feb2004, Vol. 47 Issue 2, p4
Focuses on the fundamental change in the U.S. Navy. Problem in national security; Change in operational concepts and managerial processes; Transfer of responsibility for resources planning to the operating units in the Navy.


Related Articles

  • "No Bucks, No Buck Rogers". Platt, Stuart F. // U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings;Jul2005, Vol. 131 Issue 7, p68 

    The article focuses on the difficulties faced by both the U.S. military planners and industry leaders in providing the American people with the Navy they need and deserve. Squabbling among Congress, industry and the military is not new in procurement, when it involves billions of dollars in...

  • REENGAGING the Navy, at Home AND ABROAD. Nygaard, Chuck // U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings;Apr2009, Vol. 135 Issue 4, p58 

    The article reports that the new national security strategy to be unveiled by U.S. President Barack Obama will assimilate the Navy's new strategy, the Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower. The Navy's strategy highlights the vital role of maritime services at a time when ground forces...

  • Force Structure: Navy Needs to Fully Evaluate Options and Provide Standard Guidance for Implementing Surface Ship Rotational Crewing: GAO-05-10.  // GAO Reports;11/10/2004, p1 

    The Navy has traditionally maintained overseas presence by deploying ships for 6 months. Rotating crews aboard ships that remain deployed for longer periods is an alternative the Navy could pursue to increase the utilization of ships. Senior Navy officials have also cited crew rotations as a way...

  • Ten Realities for the New CNO. Giarra, Paul S. // U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings;Aug2011, Vol. 137 Issue 8, p46 

    The article offers information on the U.S. Navy. It discusses the global significance of the U.S. Navy, alongwith the issues Navy needs to overcome. It also states that, the U.S. Navy needs to be improved through strategic and operational planning as the national security depends on the naval power.

  • SEA CHANGE: NAVSEA Charts Course for Navy of 21st Century. Keeter, Hunter C.; Burgess, Richard R. // Sea Power;Feb2004, Vol. 47 Issue 2, p10 

    Focuses on the restructure of the U.S. Navy following Operation Iraqi Freedom. Execution of new plans for the fleet; Deployment strategies for navies in support of the ongoing global war on terrorism; Annual budget for the Navy.

  • ORGANIZATIONAL.  // U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings;May2011, Vol. 137 Issue 5, p144 

    Several appendixes are presented depicting the organizational structure of U.S. military including U.S. National Defense Command Structure, Office of the Secretary of Defense, and the Department of the Navy.

  • "Sea Basing: Chasing the Dream". Hazard, Charles // U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings;Jul2005, Vol. 131 Issue 7, p65 

    The article comment on an article on seabasing by J.P. Patch published in the May 2005 issue of the journal "Proceedings of the United States Naval Institute." Patch's article does not address the fact that over the past two decades the United States has experienced significant problems in...

  • IN MY OWN WORDS. Kotlar, Kim // Sea Power;Nov2003, Vol. 46 Issue 11, p56 

    Shares insights on the national security issues. Experience of the author as a Navy cryptologist; Concern of the author on the defense issues on Capitol Hill; Advice for the military services;

  • Speaking with Sailors. Campa, Joe R. // All Hands;Jun2007, Issue 1082, p2 

    The article focuses on the history and tradition of the U.S. Navy.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics