TITLE

Erratum to: Paying the cost of skeptical theism

AUTHOR(S)
Snapper, Jeff
PUB. DATE
June 2011
SOURCE
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;Jun2011, Vol. 69 Issue 3, p233
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Correction notice
ABSTRACT
A correction to the article about skeptical theism is presented.
ACCESSION #
60590744

 

Related Articles

  • The Divine Infinity: Can traditional theists justifiably reject pantheism? Oakes, Robert // Monist;Apr97, Vol. 80 Issue 2, p251 

    Opinion. Questions whether traditional theists can justifiably reject pantheism in light of the Divine Infinity. Why proponents of traditional theism reject pantheistic metaphysic; Details on the Infinity Argument; Definition of pantheism.

  • Pantheism vs. theism: A re-appraisal. Ford, Lewis S. // Monist;Apr97, Vol. 80 Issue 2, p286 

    Reassesses the relation between pantheism and theism. Definition of pantheism; Discussion on pantheism; Information on theism.

  • Editorial preface. Hall, Ronald L. // International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;Aug2011, Vol. 70 Issue 1, p1 

    An introduction is presented in which the editor discusses various reports within the issue on topics including the preservation of theism through the defeat of naturalism, the procedural assumptions of naturalism, and the possibility of being a metaphysical naturalist by not being a materialist.

  • The Mission of Israel in a Nuclear Age. Olan, Levi A. // Judaism;Winter83, Vol. 32 Issue 1, p27 

    Discusses the replacement of theism by secularism. Denial on the existence of God; Views of a secularist on the relationship of man to one another; Function of religion to answer the meaning of human existence.

  • Is it impossible to prove a negative? Grayling, A. C. // Prospect;Mar2008, Issue 144, p8 

    The article provides an answer to a philosophical question regarding whether it is possible to prove a negative.

  • Editorial preface. Hall, R. // International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;Dec2014, Vol. 76 Issue 3, p241 

    The article discusses various papers published in this issue including one by Jonathan Jong and Aku Visala on the use of ecolutionary debunking arguments (EDa) against theism, one by Jonathan Wessling on the moral aspect of signity and rights, and one by Samuel R. Lebens on a version of negative...

  • TIME, THE "OPEN ACQUITTAL," AND DIVINE OMNISCIENCE: TWO INTERNAL PROBLEMS WITH OPEN THEISM. Cuthbertson, Mark Russell // Westminster Theological Journal;Spring2005, Vol. 67 Issue 1, p75 

    Presents a study on the internal problems with open theism. Information on open theism; Accusation of ignorance of the future free acts of humans against God; Criticism against open theism.

  • THE COHERENCE OF THEISM (Book Review). Farrelly, John // Theological Studies;Dec78, Vol. 39 Issue 4, p784 

    Reviews the book 'The Coherence of Theism,' by Richard Swinburne.

  • BEYOND THEISM (Book Review). Tilley, Terrence W. // Theological Studies;Mar87, Vol. 48 Issue 1, p167 

    Reviews the book 'Beyond Theism: A Grammar of God-Language,' by Theodore W. Jennings.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics