July 2008
Bond Buyer;7/24/2008, Vol. 365 Issue 32925, p2
Trade Publication
Correction notice
Corrections to the articles about a Nebraska court ruling on prepaid gas transactions and on the profile of municipal bond pricing and evaluation services are presented.


Related Articles

  • Supremes Delay Muni Bond Dispute. Ackerman, Andrew // Financial Planning;Apr2007, Vol. 37 Issue 4, p33 

    The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court can not decide whether to review a high-profile Kentucky municipal bond case until a decision of the case is rescheduled. A married couple is involved in the case who successfully sued the state for taxing the interest on municipal bonds sold by...

  • Market Lauds Davis Decision. Ackerman, Andrew // Bond Buyer;5/20/2008, Vol. 364 Issue 32882, p1 

    The article reports that the securities market has hailed the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in favor of the Department of Revenue of Kentucky. Fund managers, attorneys and state officials supported the decision, which upheld the status quo in the municipal market, against George and Catherine Davis...

  • Supreme Court Rules for Kentucky in Davis Case. Schroeder, Peter // Bond Buyer;5/20/2008, Vol. 364 Issue 32882, p1 

    The article reports on the case, Department of Revenue of Kentucky v. Davis, in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the state. The Supreme Court held that Kentucky's differential tax practices on bonds does not discriminate against interstate commerce, but rather promotes the...

  • Munis Unchanged to Slightly Firmer. Scarchilli, Michael // Bond Buyer;5/20/2008, Vol. 364 Issue 32882, p2 

    The article reports on the performance of the municipal bond market in the U.S. as of May 19, 2008. A bond trader in Los Angeles, California, said the market remained unchanged. Meanwhile, the Treasury bond market showed some gains; the yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note was 3.84% and...

  • Abuse of Justice. Shariff, M. Y. // Economic & Political Weekly;6/28/2014, Vol. 49 Issue 26/27, p5 

    Two letters to the editor are presented in response to the article "Akshardham Judgment I: The Law at Work" by Ravi Nair and "Akshardam: Judgment II: Between Callousness and Complicity" by Saurav Datta in the June 21, 2014 issue.

  • Excerpts From Ruling in Richmond V. J.A. Croson Company.  // Education Week;2/1/1989, Vol. 8 Issue 19, p20 

    Several excerpts from the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in "City of Richmond versus J.A. Croson Co." are presented.

  • Cornell studies double standard on appeal.  // Nation's Restaurant News;8/27/2001, Vol. 35 Issue 35, p22 

    Reports the increasing trend of overturned court decision upon appeal favoring sued employers.

  • NEWS & BRIEFS: Suit and Countersuit--Both Lose.  // Advocate;3/26/75, Issue 160, p5 

    Focuses on the dismissal of the suit which was filed by Boulder, Colorado-based gay organization Boulder Gay Liberation against Boulder-based newspaper 'Daily Camera,' with libel by judge Williams D. Neighbors. Ruling by the judge.

  • JUDGMENTS.  // Westchester County Business Journal;2/20/2012, Vol. 48 Issue 8, p20 

    The article offers information on the judgments given to court cases involving various companies in Westchester County, New York including Acre Associates LLC, AGM Management Consultants Inc., and Gar Painting LLC.

  • Hindus in Russia Brace for Gita Battle in Court.  // News India Times;02/24/2012, Vol. 43 Issue 8, p21 

    The article reports that Indian nationals in Russia are bracing for a fresh court battle and appeal against attempts in the Siberian city of Tomsk to get their sacred Bhagavad Gita banned.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics