TITLE

A comparison between seven Swiss and seven German hospitals concerning the use of coercive measures

AUTHOR(S)
Bernhardsgrütter, Renate
PUB. DATE
January 2007
SOURCE
BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Conference Paper
ABSTRACT
Background In 2004, two independent working groups in Germany and Switzerland compared the frequency and duration of coercive measures in standard psychiatric care across 14 psychiatric hospitals in Germany and Switzerland. The objective was to establish an international knowledge transfer process in order to reduce the frequency and duration of coercive measures on a long-term basis to an extent of necessity. Methods The incidence and duration of mechanical restraint and seclusion was reliably recorded across 7 Swiss and 7 German psychiatric hospitals during the one year period of 2004. Hospital structure characteristics and guidelines on coercive measures were analyzed. Results The results showed different patterns in the use of seclusion and restraint across Swiss and German hospitals. In the Swiss hospitals seclusion was more frequently used than restraint, whereas in German hospitals restraint was more frequently used than seclusion. The average duration of coercive measures was of significantly longer duration in Swiss than in German hospitals. The number of coercive measures per affected case was significantly higher in German than in Swiss hospitals. Associations of data on coercive measures with hospital structure characteristics and guidelines were significant. Conclusion International comparisons on coercive measures allow for knowledge transfer and critical reflection of national traditions in the use of coercive measures. The results clearly showed different patterns in the use of seclusion and mechanical restraint across Swiss and German hospitals. Hospital structure characteristics as well as the use of guidelines on coercive measures were associated with the frequency and duration of coercive measures, in German as well as in Swiss hospitals.
ACCESSION #
35704305

 

Related Articles

  • One hundred years ago.  // British Journal of Psychiatry;Jan97, Vol. 170, p91 

    The article recalls a paper published in the January 16, 1897 issue of "Lancet." The paper focuses on the Inspector of Lunatics' report on the Belfast Asylum in Northern Ireland. The inspector, Dr. O'Farrell, recommended that all restraint appliances should be retained in charge of the medical...

  • Impact of the physical environment of psychiatric wards on the use of seclusion. van der Schaaf, P. S.; Dusseldorp, E.; Keuning, F. M.; Janssen, W. A.; Noorthoorn, E. O. // British Journal of Psychiatry;Feb2013, Vol. 202 Issue 2, p142 

    Background: The physical environment is presumed to have an effect on aggression and also on the use of seclusion on psychiatric wards. Multicentre studies that include a broad variety of design features found on psychiatric wards and that control for patient, staff and general ward...

  • The Use of Seclusion and Restraint in Psychiatry. Chaimowitz, Gary // Canadian Journal of Psychiatry;Aug2011, Vol. 56 Issue 8, p1 

    The article offers information on the use of restraint and seclusion in psychiatry in Canada. It mentions that restraint and seclusion are only used in acute psychiatric patients to protect themselves and to avoid risks. It notes that seclusion and restraint should only be used during emergency...

  • The Millfields Charter debate: the founders respond.  // Mental Health Practice;Dec2006, Vol. 10 Issue 4, p34 

    The article presents a response of Kevin Bond, one of the founders of the Millfields Charter, on the debate about the use of prone restraint on mentally ill patients in Great Britain. Bond emphasizes that the founders of the charter believe that the issue is a moral and ethical one. He further...

  • Epidemiology of inpatient violence and coercive measures. Steinert, Tilman // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Objective To give an overview of the current knowledge on the epidemiology of in-patient violence and coercive measures in clinical psychiatry. Methods Many studies have been conducted on the epidemiology of in-patient violence by use of standardized scales such as the SOAS-R. Much research on...

  • Locking up patients with psychiatric illness. Wilkinson, Greg // British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition);2/19/1983, Vol. 286 Issue 6365, p581 

    Investigates the nature of secluding patients with psychiatric illness in Great Britain. Inadequacy of the guidelines set by the Department of Health and Social Security on the management of violent patients; Role of doctors in dealing with seclusion abuses; Need of hospitals to have strict...

  • Use of coercive measures in a psychiatric sub-acute unit. 6-month review. Moreiras, N.; Roda, S.; Ribas, Joan S.; Vicens, E.; Torres, M.; Moyano, R.; Artero, Carmen M. // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Background In our psychiatric hospital we have a guideline in order to regulate the use of coercitive measures (isolation in specials rooms and use of safety straps). These measures are the last kind of intervention we use. The guideline defines us the procedure for using the different measures,...

  • Definition and use of coercive measures in old age psychiatry settings in Germany and Wales. Kronstorfer, Rita // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Background Patients with organic mental disorders (ICD 10 F0) are a high risk group in regard to being subject to coercive measures. Methods used in old age psychiatry tend to vary widely among European countries. Legal background, ethical considerations, staffing levels and techniques available...

  • Legislation and practice of coercive measures during in-patient treatment in 12 European countries: results of a case vignette study. Steinert, Tilman; Lepping, Peter; Needham, Ian // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Background Patients who exhibit violent behavior or refuse medication during in-patient treatment are a challenge for clinical management. The management of those clinical situations is different in European countries with respect to legislation and clinical routine. Methods We selected three...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics