TITLE

A comparison between seven Swiss and seven German hospitals concerning the use of coercive measures

AUTHOR(S)
Bernhardsgrütter, Renate
PUB. DATE
January 2007
SOURCE
BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Conference Paper
ABSTRACT
Background In 2004, two independent working groups in Germany and Switzerland compared the frequency and duration of coercive measures in standard psychiatric care across 14 psychiatric hospitals in Germany and Switzerland. The objective was to establish an international knowledge transfer process in order to reduce the frequency and duration of coercive measures on a long-term basis to an extent of necessity. Methods The incidence and duration of mechanical restraint and seclusion was reliably recorded across 7 Swiss and 7 German psychiatric hospitals during the one year period of 2004. Hospital structure characteristics and guidelines on coercive measures were analyzed. Results The results showed different patterns in the use of seclusion and restraint across Swiss and German hospitals. In the Swiss hospitals seclusion was more frequently used than restraint, whereas in German hospitals restraint was more frequently used than seclusion. The average duration of coercive measures was of significantly longer duration in Swiss than in German hospitals. The number of coercive measures per affected case was significantly higher in German than in Swiss hospitals. Associations of data on coercive measures with hospital structure characteristics and guidelines were significant. Conclusion International comparisons on coercive measures allow for knowledge transfer and critical reflection of national traditions in the use of coercive measures. The results clearly showed different patterns in the use of seclusion and mechanical restraint across Swiss and German hospitals. Hospital structure characteristics as well as the use of guidelines on coercive measures were associated with the frequency and duration of coercive measures, in German as well as in Swiss hospitals.
ACCESSION #
35704305

 

Related Articles

  • The Use of Seclusion and Restraint in Psychiatry. Chaimowitz, Gary // Canadian Journal of Psychiatry;Aug2011, Vol. 56 Issue 8, p1 

    The article offers information on the use of restraint and seclusion in psychiatry in Canada. It mentions that restraint and seclusion are only used in acute psychiatric patients to protect themselves and to avoid risks. It notes that seclusion and restraint should only be used during emergency...

  • Epidemiology of inpatient violence and coercive measures. Steinert, Tilman // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Objective To give an overview of the current knowledge on the epidemiology of in-patient violence and coercive measures in clinical psychiatry. Methods Many studies have been conducted on the epidemiology of in-patient violence by use of standardized scales such as the SOAS-R. Much research on...

  • Legislation and practice of coercive measures during in-patient treatment in 12 European countries: results of a case vignette study. Steinert, Tilman; Lepping, Peter; Needham, Ian // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Background Patients who exhibit violent behavior or refuse medication during in-patient treatment are a challenge for clinical management. The management of those clinical situations is different in European countries with respect to legislation and clinical routine. Methods We selected three...

  • Organizational and Unit Factors Contributing to Reduction in the Use of Seclusion and Restraint Procedures on an Acute Psychiatric Inpatient Unit. Pollard, Richard; Yanasak, Elisia V.; Rogers, Steven A.; Tapp, André // Psychiatric Quarterly;Spring2007, Vol. 78 Issue 1, p73 

    The use of seclusion or restraint (S/R) as an emergency medical intervention to assist patients in regaining behavioral control continues to be an area of interest and concern for the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO), consistent with the ongoing concerns...

  • Regulatory, clinical, and educational approaches to eliminating restraint and seclusion. Lebel, Janice // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Background In response to national media attention on restraint and seclusion (R/S), state and national efforts in the USA have organized around the goal of eliminating their use. Several states/organizations have significantly reduced and stopped using these violent procedures. Participants...

  • 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial comparing seclusion and mechanical restraint in people with serious mental illness. Bergk, Jan; Birk, Michael; Steinert, Tilman // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Background Seclusion and mechanical restraint are widely used for people with serious mental disorders. In most countries one intervention is preferred while the other is considered as inhuman or not sufficiently safe, but identical arguments refer to different preferences. There is a lack of...

  • Inpatient and emergency child and adolescent psychiatry units in Sweden do not use restraint and seclusion: what we have learned. Rydelius, Per-Anders // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    The Swedish Health and Medical Services Act states that health and medical care for all children, youth and adults shall: Be of a high standard and satisfy the patients need for security; Be easily accessible; Be based on respect for the patients right to self-determination and integrity;...

  • Staff members' attitudes towards coercive measures. Bergk, Jan; Steinert, Tilman // BMC Psychiatry;2007 Supplement 1, Vol. 7, Special section p1 

    Background Coercive measures are associated with high strain for staff members. Most commonly used are mechanical restraint and seclusion. Both interventions are relatively secure and are considered as helpful in prevention of serious harm to self or others when other means are ineffective....

  • JCAHO seeks hospitals to test psychiatric measures. Gebhart, Fred // Drug Topics;9/18/2006, Vol. 150 Issue 18, special section p16 

    The article reports that psychiatric hospitals are being sought by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) to participate in hospital-based performance measures for inpatient psychiatric care. The measures cover use of seclusion, use of restraints, patient...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics