TITLE

None of Your Business

AUTHOR(S)
Falkenberg, Kai
PUB. DATE
April 2010
SOURCE
Forbes Asia;2010 Special Issue, Vol. 6 Issue 4, p72
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Case Study
ABSTRACT
The article presents the case study of a court case involving a rich man. In the court case, lawyer for William P. Lauder, former chief executive officer (CEO) of the Estée Lauder Co., filed a case in the New York Supreme Court. They asked the judge to keep anonymous about the suit that he had filed and to seal the file from prying eyes. However, Judge Emily Goodman ultimately refused the sealing request but signed an order forbidding the parties and their lawyers to speak to the press.
ACCESSION #
49052642

 

Related Articles

  • Slate Testifies at Judicial Conference Hearing.  // Dispute Resolution Journal;Jan1995, Vol. 50 Issue 1, p6 

    Reports that the Committee on Long-Range Planning of the Judicial Conference of the United States issued a report describing a crisis in the court system due to the number of filings of lawsuits. Alternative dispute resolution services; Delays concerning cases; Issue on courts' power to have...

  • Canadians threaten boycott. Malcolm, Teresa // National Catholic Reporter;7/26/96, Vol. 32 Issue 35, p9 

    Reports that a coalition of Canadian church and development groups are threatening to launch a boycott of tourism in Florida if the American government implements Title III of the Helms-Burton law that would allow American citizens whose property was expropriated by the government of Cuba to sue...

  • A practical guide to the ins and outs of multidistrict litigation. Barry Jr., Desmond T. // Defense Counsel Journal;Jan1997, Vol. 64 Issue 1, p58 

    Expounds on proceedings within the Judicial Panel of Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) in the United States. Congress' creation of the panel in 1968; Temporary transfer of civil actions pending in different federal districts; Prerequisites for transfer of civil actions; Choice of transferee forum...

  • Ruling that overturned suspension of student with gun assailed. Walsh, Mark // Education Week;10/02/96, Vol. 16 Issue 5, p9 

    Reports on developments concerning actions and defenses in the United States, for the week ending October 2, 1996. Uproar in the New York city schools over a court ruling that overturned the suspension of a student who brought a gun to school because the boy was searched illegally; Virginia...

  • In love with lawsuits. Zobel, Hiller B. // American Heritage;Nov94, Vol. 45 Issue 7, p58 

    Focuses on popular interest in trials and offers thoughts on why litigiousness is part of the American national character. Litigation as a spectator sport; History of public interest in the court; Concerns about the financial nature of law and lawsuits; The contingent fee in the middle of the...

  • Selected recent court decisions.  // American Journal of Law & Medicine;1996, Vol. 22 Issue 4, p563 

    Presents court decisions from the US Court of Appeals and District Courts. Black v. Secretary of Health & Human Services; Visiting Nurse Association of N. Shore v. Bullen; Sarkis v. Heimburger; United States v. Fang; Perry v. Chen; Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc. v. Lumpkin.

  • Monster on the loose: The civil justice system. Waddell, Bill // Business Forum;Summer/Fall94, Vol. 19 Issue 3/4, p3 

    Opinion. Comments on the effects of the civil justice system abuse in the United States. Emergence of numerous medical malpractice lawsuits; Excessive filing of class action lawsuits; Increase in the number of employment litigation.

  • Arbitrary rationality. Magliocca, Gerard N. // Yale Law Journal;Apr97, Vol. 106 Issue 6, p1959 

    Discusses the case `United States v. Annigoni,' and the traditional remedy of automatic reversal for convictions obtained following the erroneous denial of a peremptory remedies. Convergence between the jurisprudence of peremptory challenge and selective prosecutions.

  • Silence cannot be harmless. Chernack, Gregory S. // Yale Law Journal;May97, Vol. 106 Issue 7, p2305 

    Examines various aspects of the case `United States versus Rogers.' Assertions of the harmless error review's appropriateness; Arguments on the non-subjectivity of the omitted jury instructions to the `Chapman vs. California' review; Highlights of the case; Question on the function of the jury.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics