TITLE

New York Times prevails in libel case

AUTHOR(S)
Hernandez, Debra Gersh
PUB. DATE
October 1994
SOURCE
Editor & Publisher;10/15/94, Vol. 127 Issue 42, p20
SOURCE TYPE
Review
DOC. TYPE
Book Review
ABSTRACT
Reports on the victory of `The New York Times' newspaper in a libel suit filed against it by author Dan Moldea. US Supreme Court's refusal to hear Moldea's appeal seeking to overturn a lower court's dismissal of the case; Moldea's libel charges against the newspaper in connection with its review of his book `Interference: How Organized Crime Influences Professional Football.'
ACCESSION #
9411044220

 

Related Articles

  • Libel law. Goldberg, Stephanie B. // ABA Journal;Jul94, Vol. 80 Issue 7, p74 

    Focuses on the federal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia's reversal of a decision that found a book review by the periodical `New York Times' as libelous. Reviewer's criticism of Dan Moldea's `Interference: How Organized Crime Influences Professional Football'; Reasons for the reversal.

  • THE UNRULY WORLD OF BOOK REVIEWS. Weinberg, Steve // Columbia Journalism Review;Mar/Apr1990, Vol. 28 Issue 6, p51 

    The article discusses the controversy over the book reviews done by the "New York Times" particularly of the book entitled "Interference: How Organized Crime Influences Professional Football." Dan E. Moldea who has researched and written the book has filed a suit against the reviewer Gerald...

  • $10 million lawsuit against N.Y. Times revived on appeal. Hernandez, Debra Gersh // Editor & Publisher;3/19/94, Vol. 127 Issue 12, p28 

    Reports on the revival of a $10 million lawsuit filed by author Dan Moldea against the `New York Times' newspaper in relation to Moldea's book `Interference: How Organized Crime Influences Professional Football.' Appeal sought by Moldea after the case was dismissed in January 1922; Concerns...

  • N.Y. Times seeks review of libel suit reinstatement. Hernandez, Debra Gersh // Editor & Publisher;4/23/94, Vol. 127 Issue 17, p112 

    Reports on the petition filed by the New York Times before the United States Court of Appeals to review decision allowing the trial of a $10 million libel suit brought against the paper by author Dan Moldea. Moldea's case against the newspaper regarding the review of his book `Interference: How...

  • Ruling reversed.  // Quill;Jun94, Vol. 82 Issue 5, p18 

    Reports on the collapse of a libel lawsuit filed against `The New York Times' newspaper for publishing a review of the book `Interference: How Organized Crime Influences Professional Football,' by Dan E. Moldea. Facts and issues of the case.

  • Bad review = lawsuit. Fialkoff, Francine // Library Journal;5/15/1994, Vol. 119 Issue 9, p61 

    Asserts that a recent court ruling won't imperil `Library Journal' magazine's negative reviews. Implications of the ruling in Dan Moldea's suit against the `New York Times' for its review of his book `Interference: How Organized Crime Influences Professional Football'; Effect of the court's...

  • Appeals court upholds dismissal of $10 million suit. Hernandez, Debra Gersh // Editor & Publisher;5/21/94, Vol. 127 Issue 21, p20 

    Reports on the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit's dismissal of author Dan Moldea's libel suit against the `New York Times'. Libel suit as a result of `Times' review of author's book; Leeway for varying interpretations in reviews; Accusations of court's bowing to media...

  • Reviewers win a reversal. Gest, Ted // U.S. News & World Report;5/16/94, Vol. 116 Issue 19, p17 

    Discusses how the US Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. made a rare reversal in a prominent libel case. Issue which started in 1989 when a book review by `New York Times' sportswriter Gerald Eskenazi declared the Dan Moldea's `Interference: How Organized Crime Influences Professional...

  • Two negatives = court date(s).  // Quill;Oct94, Vol. 82 Issue 8, p31 

    Features the libel claim filed by author Dan Moldea against `The New York Times' newspaper. Moldea's claim that the periodical's book reviewer misportrayed his book; Reversal of decision before the Supreme Court petition; Implications of court decisions on journalists and publishers; Comments...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics