TITLE

Brad Hooker, Ideal Code, Real World: A Rule-Consequentialist Theory of Morality

AUTHOR(S)
Schroth, Jörg
PUB. DATE
March 2004
SOURCE
Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Mar2004, Vol. 7 Issue 1, p91
SOURCE TYPE
Review
DOC. TYPE
Book Review
ABSTRACT
Reviews the book "Ideal Code, Real World: A Rule-Consequentialist Theory of Morality," by Brad Hooker.
ACCESSION #
17020151

 

Related Articles

  • Ideal Code, Real World (Book). Audi, Robert // Utilitas;Nov2001, Vol. 13 Issue 3, p357 

    Reviews the book 'Ideal Code, Real World,' by Brad Hooker.

  • Ideal Code, Real World: A Rule-Consequentialist Theory of Morality. Brad Hooker. Shaw, William H. // Mind;Oct2001, Vol. 110 Issue 440, p1074 

    Reviews the book 'Ideal Code, Real World: A Rule-Consequentialist Theory of Morality,' by Brad Hooker.

  • Hooker's Consequentialism and the Depth of Moral Experience. Wall, Edmund // Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review;Jun2009, Vol. 48 Issue 2, p337 

    In Ideal Code, Real World, Brad Hooker seeks to offer a version of ideal rule consequentialism that is immune from standard criticisms. I will attempt to challenge Hooker's ideal rule-consequentialist theory by arguing that there are philosophical problems at the ultimate foundation of his...

  • Hooker's Ideal Code and the Sacrifice Problem. Lawlor, Rob // Social Theory & Practice;Oct2004, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p583 

    The article focuses on the concept of Brad Hooker, philosophy professor, regarding the distribution-sensitive rule-consequentialism. Hooker has defended his concept about consequentialism in his book "Ideal Code, Real World" which he discussed the human rights. In his book, Hooker has cited that...

  • Rule Consequentialism and Scope. Kahn, Leonard // Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Nov2012, Vol. 15 Issue 5, p631 

    Rule consequentialism (RC) holds that the rightness and wrongness of actions is determined by an ideal moral code, i.e., the set of rules whose internalization would have the best consequences. But just how many moral codes are there supposed to be? Absolute RC holds that there is a single...

  • What Do We Know When We Know How to Go On? Nelson, James Lindemann // Hastings Center Report;Jul/Aug2001, Vol. 31 Issue 4, p50 

    Reviews the book `Moral Particularism,' edited by Brad Hooker and Margaret Little.

  • A Note on Hooker's “Rule Consequentialism”. CARSON, THOMAS L. // Mind;Jan1991, Vol. 100 Issue 397, p117 

    The article reports on the criticism of Brad Hooker's argument of Rule Consequentialism (RC). Hooker's RC requires affluent people to sacrifice 10 percent of their income to help eradicate poverty and hunger, however the author states that Hooker's assumption that the moral code would be...

  • Why One Basic Principle? Brand-Ballard, Jeffrey // Utilitas;Jun2007, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p220 

    Principle monists believe that our moral duties, such as fidelity and non-maleficence, can be justified in terms of one basic moral principle. Principle pluralists disagree, some suggesting that only an excessive taste for simplicity or a desire to mimic natural science could lead one to endorse...

  • Rule consequentialism and disasters. Kahn, Leonard // Philosophical Studies;Jan2013, Vol. 162 Issue 2, p219 

    Rule consequentialism (RC) is the view that it is right for A to do F in C if and only if A's doing F in C is in accordance with the set of rules which, if accepted by all, would have consequences which are better than any alternative set of rules (i.e., the ideal code). I defend RC from two...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics