TITLE

That Long-Awaited Booklet

PUB. DATE
January 1962
SOURCE
New Republic;1/15/62, Vol. 146 Issue 3, p13
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Criticizes the booklet "Fallout Protection, What to Know and Do About Nuclear Attack," issued by the U.S. Department of Defense and available free at all post offices as of January 2, 1962. Failure of the booklet to provide a reason behind the suggestion for people to avoid looking at an explosion; Comment of James R. Newman, an editor of "Scientific American," on the booklet's instruction on what to do in case of a nuclear attack; Attempt of the department to get scientific information from the National Academy of Sciences' Civil Defense Advisory Committee for the booklet.
ACCESSION #
9969862

 

Related Articles

  • DoD Reveals New Nuclear Policy. Polmar, Norman // U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings;Mar2002, Vol. 128 Issue 3, p119 

    Reports the plan of the Department of Defense on nuclear policy in the U.S. Goals of defense policy; Concept of nuclear forces triad; Establishment of upgraded command, control, intelligence and planning activities.

  • Target audience. Masco, Joseph // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jul/Aug2008, Vol. 64 Issue 3, p22 

    The article discusses government produced films on nuclear warfare and its impact to public opinion on the effects of nuclear weapons. The author outlines several films concerning nuclear warfare made during the era of nuclear above ground testing. These include "Exercise Desert Rock (1951),"...

  • The Least Awful Option? Concern about a "limited" nuclear war.  // Time;6/11/1979, Vol. 113 Issue 24, p22 

    The article focuses on the least awful option, a contingency plan being considered by the U.S. civilian defense expert from the congressional committees on a limited nuclear war. U.S. Secretary of Defense Harold Brown acknowledges that U.S. should stay skeptical and reserve its capability for a...

  • International and operational law note.  // Army Lawyer;Oct98, Issue 311, p55 

    Part IV. Discusses the law of war principle adhered to by the United States Department of Defense. Rules intended to prevent or minimize harm to civilians; Principle complimenting the principles of `distinction' and `military objective'; Limited mechanism to bypass applying certain rules...

  • Improving the Joint Deployment Process. Bronson, Robert C. // Army Logistician;Jul/Aug2000, Vol. 32 Issue 4, p2 

    Reports on the commitment by the United States Department of Defense in ensuring that its deployment capabilities can support worldwide contingency operations. Joint deployment process initiatives; Identification of a joint deployment doctrine; Proposal to use emerging joint deployment...

  • THE STRATEGY OF CIVIL DEFENSE. Lapp, Ralph E. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Aug/Sep1950, Vol. 6 Issue 8/9, p241 

    The article focuses on the measures to be taken to have a truly effective civil defense. The author stresses that the only effective atomic defense includes the dispersion of the country's industry and population. He claims that it is reasonable for the civilians to evacuate their cities before...

  • Russian nuclear war, made in Omaha. Arkin, William M. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jul/Aug2000, Vol. 56 Issue 4, p72 

    Focuses on the Red Integrated Strategic Offensive Plan (RISOP) from the United States (U.S.) Defense Department, which provides a guide on how Russia could attack the West. Assessment of the sufficiency of the U.S. nuclear forces; Application of RISOP in Russia; Importance of the determination...

  • Secret Sharer.  // Progressive;Feb86, Vol. 50 Issue 2, p12 

    Comments on the secrecy surrounding the Pentagon's playbook for waging nuclear war called the Single Integrated Operations Plan (SIOP). Refusal to let the U.S. Congress see pages of a report on the Pentagon's command and control of nuclear forces; View that the American public would not support...

  • Nuke Push. Wall, Robert // Aviation Week & Space Technology;7/21/2003, Vol. 159 Issue 3, p41 

    U.S. military officials and nuclear weapons experts are voicing support for the development of new warheads they view as critical to maintaining the relevance of the nation's nuclear arsenal. The resurgence of the nuclear issue is driven partly by the desire of some to move the nuclear arsenal...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics