TITLE

Sister Act

AUTHOR(S)
Rosen, Jeffrey
PUB. DATE
June 2003
SOURCE
New Republic;6/16/2003, Vol. 228 Issue 23, p14
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Offers observations on the decision of United States Chief Justice of the Supreme Court William Rehnquist in Nevada v. Hibbs. In his 6-3 opinion holding that individuals can sue states for violating the Family and Medical Leave Act, the chief justice seemed to be channeling Betty Friedan. Reluctant to believe that Rehnquist has evolved into an avatar of second-wave feminism, some observers are speculating that he is on the verge of retiring from the Supreme Court and is therefore reluctant to have one of his final acts be a ruling that would make it impossible for individuals to sue states for violating such a popular law. Far from showing a new appreciation of feminist theory, Rehnquist's opinion is the latest assertion of the judicial supremacy that represents his most important legacy. Central to it is the extravagant claim that Congress may only allow individuals to sue states for engaging in those forms of discrimination that the Court itself has already identified as unconstitutional--in the case of the Family and Medical Leave Act, gender discrimination. As in the earlier cases overturning federal laws, the Hibbs case offered Rehnquist an opportunity to argue that Congress may not define constitutional rights more broadly than the Supreme Court and may only hold the states liable for forms of discrimination that the Supreme Court has identified in advance as unconstitutional.
ACCESSION #
9969831

 

Related Articles

  • RECONSIDERING REHNQUIST. Stewart, David O. // ABA Journal;Apr88, Vol. 74 Issue 4, p40 

    Focuses on the three cases wherein the opinions of U.S. Chief Justice William Rehnquist were notable, in the areas of government in criminal cases, individual and property rights. 'Mathews v. United States'; 'Hustler Magazine Inc. v. Falwell'; 'Pennell v. City of San Jose.'

  • STRATEGY AND CONSTRAINTS ON SUPREME COURT OPINION ASSIGNMENT. Wahlbeck, Paul J. // University of Pennsylvania Law Review;Jun2006, Vol. 154 Issue 6, p1729 

    The article reports on the evaluation of the late United States Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist's exercise of judicial powers, particularly his assignment decisions. It states that Chief Justices are able of influencing a court's outcome through his authority to choose the Justice that will...

  • Justice Restraint. Forsythe, Clarke D. // Human Life Review;Summer2005, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p101 

    Profiles U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist. View of Rehnquist on judicial restraint; Career history of the judge; Reference to cases adjudicated by Rehnquist; Loyalty of the chief justice to the U.S. constitution.

  • Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Corrections Law. Smith, Christopher E. // Corrections Compendium;Sep/Oct2006, Vol. 31 Issue 5, p6 

    The article recounts the life of U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist and presents information on his influence over developments in federal, including corrections law. It looks at the themes in the judicial opinions and decision-making of Rehnquist. It discusses the role of...

  • William H. Rehnquist: Judicial Restraint and Freedom of Expression.  // Free Speech Yearbook;1994, Vol. 32, p50 

    An essay is presented on the theory proposed by U.S. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist on judicial restraint and its application on his free expression opinions. It analyzes and evaluates published free expression opinions of Rehnquist after his nomination as Chief Justice in 1986 through 1993....

  • Miranda Reprised. Savage, David G. // ABA Journal;Aug2000, Vol. 86 Issue 8, p32 

    Focuses on the debate concerning the United States Supreme Court case, Miranda versus Arizona. Stance of Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist on the issue; Lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California against police officers.

  • PRAGMATISM AND JUDGMENT: A COMMENT ON LUND. Tushnet, Mark // Northwestern University Law Review;Fall2004, Vol. 99 Issue 1, p289 

    Discusses the stance of the U.S. Supreme Court under Chief Justice William Rehnquist on civil rights issues. Reason for identifying the Court with a member of its minority faction; Views on describing the Court as pragmatic; Information on the Legal Process formulation.

  • Rights Under Fire. Sunstein, Cass R. // New Republic;11/09/98, Vol. 219 Issue 19, p42 

    Reviews the book "All the Laws But One: Civil Liberties in Wartime," by William H. Rehnquist.

  • The Individual Right to Federalism in the Rehnquist Court. Hills Jr., Roderick M. // George Washington Law Review;Aug2006, Vol. 74 Issue 5/6, p888 

    The article examines the individual right to federalism under the leadership of William Rehnquist, the late U.S. Supreme Court chief justice, in the country. It says that the limitation of the enumerated powers of the U.S. Congress and the limitation of the court power by depending on state law...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics