TITLE

Doctors talk radiation level from scans, Japanese nuclear crisis

AUTHOR(S)
Brown, Todd R.
PUB. DATE
March 2011
SOURCE
Business Journal Serving Fresno & the Central San Joaquin Valley;3/18/2011, Issue 324310, p8
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the radiation level that has increased due to nuclear disasters in Japan like one at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant. It discusses the harmful impacts of the excess computer tomography (CT) scans. It also mentions about the health problems caused by the exposure of various body parts including brain, neck, and chest to CT.
ACCESSION #
99384808

 

Related Articles

  • Analysis of the effect of radiation criteria for population evacuation on the socioeconomic consequences of the npp accident in fukushima prefecture (japan). Aron, D.; Arutyunyan, R.; Bolshov, L.; Panchenko, S.; Tokarchuk, D. // Atomic Energy;Jul2012, Vol. 112 Issue 3, p194 

    The social and economic consequences of the March 11, 2011 radiation accident at the Fukushima-1 NPP in Japan are analyzed. Data on the contamination of the territory and the expected dose load to the population are presented. The number of inhabitants who as a result of the accident were...

  • One minute with... David Spiegelhalter. George, Alison // New Scientist;3/26/2011, Vol. 209 Issue 2805, p33 

    The article presents an interview with David Spiegelhalter, the Winton Professor of the Public understanding of Risk at the University of Cambridge. When asked why people fear nuclear energy, Spiegelhalter says that nuclear energy is invisible and is an unknowable quantity. He comments on the...

  • Protection of People and Environment From Radiation Risk Through Good Regulatory Practice. Jais, Azlina Mohammad; Hassan, Najwa // AIP Conference Proceedings;2017, Vol. 1799 Issue 1, p020004-1 

    The term "good regulatory practice" has seen growing frequency of usage worldwide, especially since the 2011 Fukushima nuclear incident. However, the term appears quite ambiguous as it may mean differently to different people. This leads us to the first important question: what does "good...

  • Fukushima and the Future of Radiation Research. Coleman, C. Norman // Radiation Research;Jan2013, Vol. 179 Issue 1, p1 

    The author discusses the multiple disaster incident in Japan that began on March 11, 2011 and how this incident might impact the future of the Radiation Research Society. Topics discussed include the contributions of radiation sciences to society in general, the impact of the watershed incident...

  • Potential consequences of the Fukushima accident for off-site nuclear emergency management: a case study for Germany. Gering, F.; Gerich, B.; Wirth, E.; Kirchner, G. // Radiation Protection Dosimetry;Jul2013, Vol. 155 Issue 2, p146 

    The Fukushima accident led to high radionuclide releases into the atmosphere for more than 3 weeks. This situation has not been assumed when the concepts of nuclear emergency preparedness were developed internationally. The results of simulations studying potential implications of Fukushima-like...

  • Actionable analysis of the accident at the fukushima-1 nuclear power plant (japan) and prediction of its consequences. Arutyunyan, R.; Bolshov, L.; Kiselev, A.; Krasnoperov, S.; Pavlovskii, O.; Panchenko, S.; Pripachkin, D.; Strizhov, V. // Atomic Energy;Jul2012, Vol. 112 Issue 3, p178 

    The work done by the Technical Crisis Center at the Institute of Problems in the Safe Development of Nuclear Energy of the Russian Academy of Sciences on providing scientific-technical support to the National Control Center for Crisis Situations of the Russian Ministry of Emergency Situations...

  • Doctor David Bull explains…what are the real risks of radiation? Bull, David // Gay Times (09506101);Jun2011, Issue 393, p107 

    The article explains the risks of nuclear radiation. According to the author, two of the most commonly used elements in generating nuclear power are Uranium 235 and Plutonium 239. He claims that people are exposed to radiation everyday from the sun, x-rays and other sources but the dosage is...

  • The fear for an ATOMIC future. Jansen, Richard // TCE: The Chemical Engineer;Oct2011, Issue 844, p46 

    The article discusses concerns regarding the future of nuclear power. The key reasons for public mistrust on nuclear power are its association with atomic weapons and health risks for ionizing radiation. World Nuclear Agency director general John Ritch explained the essential safety of nuclear...

  • Uranium companies ride post-2011 surge. Clark, M. J. // Wyoming Business Report;Mar2012, Vol. 12 Issue 13, p12 

    The article discusses the recovery of uranium companies after the 2011 nuclear disaster in Fukushima, Japan. It notes that while safety and re-assessment of nuclear plans became the trend after the Fukushima disaster, countries like China, Russia, and India were determined to build up their...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics