Good intentions and ICH-GCP: Trial conduct training needs to go beyond the ICH-GCP document and include the intention-to-treat principle

Browne, Lois H; Graham, Peter H
December 2014
Clinical Trials;Dec2014, Vol. 11 Issue 6, p629
Academic Journal
No abstract available.


Related Articles

  • CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts. Boutron, Isabelle; Altman, Douglas G.; Moher, David; Schulz, Kenneth F.; Ravaud, Philippe // Annals of Internal Medicine;7/4/2017, Vol. 167 Issue 1, p40 

    Incomplete and inadequate reporting is an avoidable waste that reduces the usefulness of research. The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement is an evidence-based reporting guideline that aims to improve research transparency and reduce waste. In 2008, the CONSORT Group...

  • Healthy user and related biases in observational studies of preventive interventions: a primer for physicians. Shrank, William H.; Patrick, Amanda R.; Alan Brookhart, M.; Brookhart, M Alan // JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine;May2011, Vol. 26 Issue 5, p546 

    The current emphasis on comparative effectiveness research will provide practicing physicians with increasing volumes of observational evidence about preventive care. However, numerous highly publicized observational studies of the effect of prevention on health outcomes have reported...

  • Subgroup Analyses: When Should We Believe Them? Ghert, Michelle; Petrisor, Brad // Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, American Volume;7/18/2012 Supp1, Vol. 94-A, p61 

    The article outlines the correct strategies for implementing subgroup analyses for randomized controlled clinical trials in medicine. It presents guidelines for interpreting the results of subgroup analyses and specific criteria that should be analyzed before making conclusions from subgroup...

  • Return of the Troglodyte? Eckert, Steven E. // International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants;2014, Vol. 29 Issue 5, p1015 

    The author reflects on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in implant dentistry. He suggests that dental professionals and the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services have discussed several possible problems which are associated...

  • Bias in randomised controlled trials: comparison of crossover group and parallel group designs.  // BMJ: British Medical Journal;8/15/2015, Vol. 351 Issue 8021, ph4283 

    The article presents a quiz on the randomised, double blind, crossover trial study that compared the efficacy and side effects of synthetic cannabinoid nabilone with those of weak opioid dihydrocodeine in treating chronic neuropathic pain.

  • Blindness in Randomized Controlled Trials. Shamsipour, Mansour // International Journal of Fertility & Sterility;Apr-Jun2010, Vol. 4 Issue 1, p40 

    The article discusses blindness and its importance in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), specifically in clinical trials evaluating therapeutic effects. It defines blinding or masking as the condition wherein study participants, health care providers and evaluators gathering outcome data are...

  • Evaluación del «riesgo de sesgo» de los ensayos clínicos publicados en la Revista Colombiana de Anestesiología. Calvache, José Andrés; Barajas-Nava, Leticia; Sánchez, Claudia; Giraldo, Alberto; Alarcón, José Domingo; Delgado-Noguera, Mario // Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology / Revista Colombiana de Anes;ago-oct2012, Vol. 40 Issue 3, p183 

    Introduction: Randomized clinical trials (RCT) are one of the most reliable methods of scientific investigation in health sciences. It is a corner stone of evidence based medicine and the backbone of high standard knowledge. Several types of errors can compromise the results and affect its...

  • Comparator bias: why comparisons must address genuine uncertainties. Mann, Howard; Djulbegovic, Benjamin // JRSM Cardiovascular Disease;Jan2013, Vol. 106 Issue 1, p30 

    The article discusses the problem of comparator bias in controlled clinical trials. It is noted that comparator bias is introduced when treatments known to be beneficial are withheld from patients participating in controlled trials. The article also discusses the inappropriate use of inactive...

  • Planning a clinical research study. Chan, Simon; Jönsson, Anders; Bhandari, Mohit // Indian Journal of Orthopaedics;Jan-Mar2007, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p16 

    The article focuses on randomized controlled trials (RCT) as the most valid of the clinical research designs. It says that the randomization process involves generation of an allocation sequence and allocation concealment. It stresses that blinding guarantees that performance bias and detection...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics