TITLE

Frontmatter

PUB. DATE
October 2014
SOURCE
Bibliotheksdienst;Oct2014, Vol. 48 Issue 11, pI
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article presents a table of contents for the October 2014 issue of the library science periodical "Bibliotheksdienst" along with a list of the authors, editors, and publisher of the periodical. Information is also provided on the periodical's compliance with open access standards and deadlines for article submissions.
ACCESSION #
99344629

 

Related Articles

  • Open Access Models and their Implications for the Players on the Scientific Publishing Market. Bernius, Steffen; Hanauske, Matthias; König, Wolfgang; Dugall, Berndt // Economic Analysis & Policy;2009, Vol. 39 Issue 1, p103 

    Open Access (OA) as a new form of distributing scientific literature is broadly accepted by scholars, but in most disciplines the realization of the paradigm is progressing rather slowly. The reason for this lies, on the one hand, in a lack of incentives for individual authors. On the other...

  • Open Access: ARL vs. Publishers. Albanese, Andrew // Library Journal;10/1/2007, Vol. 132 Issue 16, p14 

    The article focuses on the statement released by the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) criticizing an initiative against public access legislation, supported by the Association of American Publishers (AAP). ARL officials believe that Partnership for Research Integrity in Science & Medicine...

  • Open Access: ARL vs. Publishers. Albanese, Andrew // Library Journal;10/1/2007, Vol. 132 Issue 16, p14 

    The article focuses on the statement released by the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) criticizing an initiative against public access legislation, supported by the Association of American Publishers (AAP). ARL officials believe that Partnership for Research Integrity in Science & Medicine...

  • BioMed upbeat despite editors' concerns over content overlap. Chillingworth, Mark // Information World Review;Jun2006, Issue 225, p3 

    Reports on the concerns raised by BioMed Central editors about the management methods of the publishing company. Response of publisher Matthew Cockerill to the complaints of editors; Necessity to improve the journal's business model and open access.

  • Balancing Author and Publisher Rights. Suber, Peter // Information World / Bilgi Dunyasi;Apr2008, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p207 

    As open access gains momentum, more and more scholarly authors are trying to retain the rights they need to authorize open access. At the same time, many publishers continue to demand transfer of copyright and resist author demands to retain key rights. This article explores the possibility of a...

  • Announcement.  // Journal of Parasitology;Oct2016, Vol. 102 Issue 5, p564 

    The article reports on the announcement of reduced fees for authors by the periodical, who wish to publish their articles open access in the journal.

  • Self-archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences. Antelman, Kristin // Learned Publishing;Apr2006, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p85 

    Authors in different disciplines exhibit very different behaviours on the so-called 'green' road to open access, i.e. self-archiving. This study looks at the self-archiving behaviour of authors publishing in leading journals in six social science disciplines. It tests the hypothesis that authors...

  • The Future of Open Access Publishing in the Netherlands: Constant Dripping Wears Away the Stone. Woutersen-Windhouwer, Saskia // Journal of Academic Librarianship;Jan2013, Vol. 39 Issue 1, p105 

    At present, about 20% of the scientific publications worldwide are freely (open-access) available (Björk, Welling, Laakso, Majlender, Hedlund, & Guðnason, 2010) and this percentage is constantly on the rise. In the Netherlands, a similar trend is visible (see Fig. 1). Why is open-access...

  • THE ETHICS OF OPEN ACCESS TO RESEARCH: A Call for Civil Disobedience and Moral Courage. Covey, Denise Troll // Progressive Librarian;Summer2009, Issue 33, p26 

    The article discusses the ideological context, official rhetoric and rank-and-file behavior of authors and publishers related to free online or open access (OA) of scholarly journal articles. It explores the continuous disagreement among proponents and opponents regarding the benefits of OA and...

Share

Other Topics