TITLE

A Framework for the Analysis of Collaborative and Interactive Elements in MOOCs

AUTHOR(S)
Andersen, Rasmus Kvist; Garp, Kristian; Nellemann, Kevin; Nielsen, Melissa Frost; ├śrngreen, Rikke
PUB. DATE
January 2014
SOURCE
Proceedings of the European Conference on e-Learning;2014, p19
SOURCE TYPE
Conference Proceeding
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The number of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and the number of participants therein have exploded within the last couple of years. The literature on MOOCs (according to Clark, Daniel and Kolowich) mentions several characteristics of MOOCs: flexible, free, and providing room for niche subjects of learning. Criticism points to questionable quality and lack of student activation. Few empirical investigations focus on systematic analysis of student interaction in MOOCs. In this paper, the argument is that interaction between participants' of MOOCs on subject matter issues are a sign of collaborative knowledge construction processes and, as such, signs of learning (in line with the CSCL thinking of Laurillard, Stahl, Sorensen, and Salmon). This paper presents a study whose objective is to identify methods for analyzing and evaluating the nature of collaborative knowledge construction in the discussion forums of an MOOC, and relate this to the overall learning objective and educational design for learning of the specific MOOC that is analyzed. The analytical frame builds on two theoretical mindsets on interaction and collaboration. Language Games (LG) (as defined by Wittgenstein and applied in Sorensen, Takle, and Moser in CSCL) are applied as a method to investigate the structural elements. That is, the participants are viewed as the 'players' that engage in LG, where, for example, both openings and closing are viewed as vital in a successful interaction. Here, the volume of structural elements in selected online dialogues and the exemplary LG that is implemented becomes interesting. Salmon's Five-Stage model is the second tool, where the same selected dialogues are analyzed to identify where in the Five-Stage model (5S) the participants are interacting from, and if any progression occurs in the duration of the course. Moreover, the overall educational design is evaluated on the basis of Salmon's ideas. In the winter of 2013, the Coursera course 'A Brief History of Humankind' was analyzed. The findings show that the collaborative knowledge construction process occurs from the first week onward, and that the quality in a Salmon 5S view improved from week 1 to 10, but there are also contradicting findings regarding mutual respect and conversational tone. The analysis using LG finds that structural elements are important for the quality of the game, as responsibility and closing of games is seldom present, but that the games are initiated and many posts are made within the rules of the games. As such, this framework reveals paradoxical trends. There are authentic collaborative knowledge construction processes, although the number of active participants may be very few compared to the number of people enrolled. There are signs of collaboration, where the disruptive nature of MOOCs as a learning innovation argues against the postulate that MOOCs are solely transmissive in nature. Perhaps, MOOCs instead transcend the traditional Computer Supported Collaborative Learning CSCL (CSCL) perspectives for those who want to participate actively. This is discussed further in the paper.
ACCESSION #
99239661

 

Related Articles

  • The ABCs of MOOCs: What It's Like To Enroll. Pope, Justin // Hispanic Outlook in Higher Education Magazine;11/18/2013, Vol. 24 Issue 4, p17 

    A personal narrative is presented which explores the author's experience of enrolling in a massive open online course.

  • A Comparison of Learner Intent and Behaviour in Live and Archived MOOCs. Campbell, Jennifer; Gibbs, Alison; Najafi, Hedieh; Severinski, Cody // International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning;Nov2014, Vol. 15 Issue 5, p235 

    The advent of massive open online courses (MOOCs) has created opportunities for learning that are clearly in high demand, but the direction in which MOOCs should evolve to best meet the interests and needs of learners is less apparent. Motivated by our interest in whether there are potential and...

  • MOOCs: Massive Start, Trickling Finish.  // Software Practitioner;May/Jun2014, Vol. 24 Issue 3, p6 

    The article reports on some research which found the poor completion rate of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) and the need of further studies to investigate the results.

  • Are Small, Private Online Courses the Future of Higher Education in America? Poulos, James // Distance Education Report;8/1/2015, Vol. 19 Issue 15, p7 

    An excerpt of the article "Are Small, Private Online Courses the Future of Higher Education in America?," by James Poulos in the July 11, 2015 issue of the periodical "The Week" is presented which focuses on the small, private online courses (SPOCs).

  • Can Online Learning Scale Without Losing Quality? Johnson, Glenn // Distance Education Report;4/15/2013, Vol. 17 Issue 8, p1 

    The article discusses the framework to guide teaching faculty, information technology (IT) personnel, and instructional designers to look for the solution to increase enrollments while maintaining the quality of online educational programs in the U.S. Topics include implications of massive open...

  • Learning in the Clouds? Butin, Dan W. // New England Journal of Higher Education;7/17/2013, p1 

    The article discusses the pros and cons of online courses. It highlights key success stories of students engaged in massive open online courses and computerized adaptive testing including the opportunities for mastery learning at a much faster pace than in traditional classrooms. It mentions the...

  • MOOC Students Who Got Offline Help Scored Higher, Study Finds.  // Distance Education Report;7/1/2013, Vol. 17 Issue 13, p4 

    The article offers information on related to massive open online course (MOOC). According to Massaschusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)) and Harvard University, people who worked on course material offline with a classmate of someone who has the expertise in the subject did better than the...

  • The Essence of MOOCs: Multi-Venue, Nonlinear, Learner-Initiated Learning. Batson, Trent // Campus Technology Magazine;Aug2013, Vol. 26 Issue 12, p4 

    The article presents a perspective on the new model of Massive Open Online courses (MOOCs). It says that the upswing of interest in MOOCs has led to the speeding up of a historic move to learner-initiated learning (LIL) which has been underway for decades. The difference between MOOCs and...

  • Blended MOOCs: The Best of Both Worlds? lamartina, david // Campus Technology Magazine;Aug2013, Vol. 26 Issue 12, p20 

    The article reports that blended Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) can solve both pedagogical and economic aspects facing the trend, as it solves some of the assessment and certification issues facing stand-alone MOOCs. A couple of schools have already piloted the blended MOOC model. Though it...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics