TITLE

Bridging the gap Between Intellectual Capital Models: An Ancestry/Chronology Approach

AUTHOR(S)
Alhusban, Mohammad; Ragsdell, Gillian
PUB. DATE
January 2014
SOURCE
Proceedings of the International Conference on Intellectual Capi;2014, p465
SOURCE TYPE
Conference Proceeding
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Since the first coining of the term 'intellectual capital' (IC) in Stewart's "Brainpower" article of 1991, IC has gained popularity and interest amongst researchers from different disciplines as a source of attaining and maintaining competitive advantages. The result of these disciplines (e.g. human resources, accounting, marketing and finance) feeding into the IC literature has been a dramatic increase in the number of IC models. The diversity of the models has given rise to different approaches for realising the value of IC, provided different taxonomies for classifying IC, and introduced different practices for managing, measuring and reporting IC. This variety has made it a challenge for organisations to select the appropriate model to systematically manage, measure and report their organisational knowledge. This paper visualises the roots of IC models in the literature by examining the foundations and principles on which they are based. Such a visualisation affords the opportunity to establish common bases for IC modelling in order to reduce the diversity between IC models and increase their practical applicability. These bases are: the tendency towards enhancing the taxonomy of IC, and the tendency towards establishing the practices of managing, measuring and reporting IC. The main contribution of this paper is three ancestry/chronology diagrams that visualise fifty-four IC models and the rationale behind their development, which in turn brings greater coherence to the literature on IC modelling and conceptualisation.
ACCESSION #
99225094

 

Related Articles

  • Introduction. Liyanage, Shantha; Johanson, Ulf; Hansson, Bo // Singapore Management Review;2002 Special Issue, Vol. 24 Issue 3, p1 

    Introduces a series of articles on the status and future direction of intangible asset measurement and the relationship between the formation of intellectual capital and a firm's growth.

  • MODEL FOR ACCOUNTING INFORMATION VALUATION, USING MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION. Radneantu, Nicoleta; Stan, Elena Roxana; Gabroveanu, Emilia // Annals of DAAAM & Proceedings;Jan2011, p577 

    The growing importance of intangible assets can be seen while the emergence of knowledge-based economy makes its presence felt. This paper is trying to highlight the importance of intangible assets which are not recorded in traditional financial statements for generating added value. The...

  • Evaluation dilemma. Jones, Llewellyn // Finance Week;01/14/2000, p12 

    Focuses on the issue of measuring the value of intellectual capital. Principal asset for most high tech firms; Definition of intellectual capital by Leif Edvinsson, corporate director of intellectual capital at Skandia; Value for investor.

  • Intellectual Capital Values in Liquidation. Anson, Weston; Lussan, Jay D. // Secured Lender;Nov/Dec2001, Vol. 57 Issue 6, p52 

    Discusses the importance of accurate valuation of intellectual capital and other intangible assets in liquidation in the United States. Core issues that should be addressed to make accurate valuations; Components of intellectual capital and the role they play both in the ongoing enterprise and...

  • Intellectual Capital Evaluation: Return on Assets Methods Versus Market Capitalization Methods. Ramanauskaite, Agne; Rudzioniene, Kristina // Proceedings of the International Conference on Intellectual Capi;2013, p557 

    According to the current standards of accounting, only a minor segment of intellectual capital (IC) is presented in financial statements of enterprises as it usually does not satisfy one of the criteria of property recognition in financial accounting, namely, reliable valuation. This results in...

  • Should Human Resources Be Reflected on the Balance Sheet? Edmonds, Charles P.; Rogow, Robert // FE: The Magazine for Financial Executives;Jan1986, Vol. 2 Issue 1, p42 

    Focuses on human resource accounting. Reasons for the failure of firms to include their human resource and other intangible assets to their balance sheets; Methods of human resource valuation; Reporting and use of human resource accounting.

  • Intellectual capital reporting for universities: conceptual background and application for Austrian universities. Leitner, Karl-Heinz // Research Evaluation;Aug2004, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p130 

    A university's most valuable resources are its researchers and students with their relations and organisational routines; their most important output is knowledge. These resources can be interpreted as intangible assets or intellectual capital, even though the term has so far not been used...

  • Economic Growth and Intangible Capitals: Europe versus Asia. Navarro, José-Luis Alfaro; Ruiz, Victor-Raúl López; Peña, Domingo Nevado // Panoeconomicus;2014, Vol. 61 Issue 3, p261 

    At present, the international growth model includes important restrictions about the consideration of GDP as a unique tool for measurement. In this sense, taking into consideration the wealth of a country, we must add intangibles such as human development, country image, employment conditions,...

  • Intellectual Capital Reporting - Advantages, Disadvantages and Usability's Related to the Traditional Accounting. Florin, Radu; Ciprian, Gîju George; Costel, Barbu // Ovidius University Annals, Series Economic Sciences;2012, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p1627 

    The accounting as an instrument of information must offer information to different users of exact information. The information concerning the accounting for the intellectual capital of the enterprise, not only that they can be useful for the inside public, but also to the outside one, as well as...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics