TITLE

Abernathy: Access Issue's Alive

AUTHOR(S)
Hearn, Ted
PUB. DATE
June 2002
SOURCE
Multichannel News;6/3/2002, Vol. 23 Issue 22, p3
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Informs that the decision of U.S. Court of Appeals for D.C. Circuit on line-sharing rules was a setback for the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Comments of media and telecommunications analyst Blair Levin on the decision of the court; Views of FCC member Kathleen Abernathy on impact of court's decision.
ACCESSION #
9901282

 

Related Articles

  • Appeals Court Rejects Verizon Data-Roaming Challenge. Baker, Debra // CT Reports;12/5/2012, p1 

    The article discusses the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in upholding the April 2011 data-roaming order of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). It states that the order, which requires wireless carriers to offer roaming services, rejects the...

  • Media ownership ruling could impact FCC's biennial review process.  // RCR Wireless News;2/25/2002, Vol. 21 Issue 8, p10 

    Reports that the ruling made by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, on November 19, 2001, on media ownership, could affect the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) process for reviewing rules every two years. Purpose of the ruling; Basis of the rule reviewing...

  • COURT STRIKES DOWN CROSS-OWNERSHIP BAN.  // Quill;May2002, Vol. 90 Issue 4, p7 

    Focuses on the ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia which rejected the cable-broadcast cross-ownership ban. Implication of the ban for companies; Origin of the cross-ownership rules; Court order for the U.S. Federal Communications Commission to decide about the...

  • NCTA Tops FCC Over Sheetrock Rules. Hearn, Ted // Multichannel News;3/15/2004, Vol. 25 Issue 11, p50 

    Reports on the February 2004 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit disapproving a rule by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that prohibits cable operators from removing cable wires embedded in Sheetrock. Reason for the prohibition of wire removal according to...

  • APPEALS COURT: NEXTWAVE KEEPS SPECTRUM. Gohring, Nancy // Interactive Week;7/2/2001, Vol. 8 Issue 26, p20 

    Reports on the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit over wireless licenses once owned by NextWave Telecom. Information on NextWave's dispute with the U.S. Federal Communications Commission; Reason of the commission for not appealing the ruling to...

  • Court tosses telecom rules back to FCC. Gross, Grant // Network World;3/8/2004, Vol. 21 Issue 10, p26 

    Reports that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has thrown out a large chunk of the Federal Communications Commission rules governing what parts of their networks the incumbent local exchange carriers must share with competitors. Overturn of much of the so-called...

  • Backup power ruling remains in limbo. Silva, Jeffrey // RCR Wireless News;6/2/2008, Vol. 27 Issue 17, p6 

    The article reports that a dispute has erupted over whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit should delay ruling on the wireless industry's challenge to the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) backup power rule until U.S. administration budget officials...

  • Court ruling gives rural wireline carriers more time for WLNP. Weaver, Heather Forsgren // RCR Wireless News;3/21/2005, Vol. 24 Issue 12, p14 

    Reports on the move of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to require the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to examine the impact of its wireless local number portability rules on small wireline carriers. Compliance of FCC to the requirements of Regulatory...

  • Court upholds FCC's rules.  // R&D Magazine;Apr2007, Vol. 49 Issue 4, p39 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals to uphold Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) rule that barred states from applying their telecommunications laws to a class of voice-over-Internet-protocol (VoIP) providers. The court concluded that the FCC acted reasonably...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics