TITLE

House Panel OKs 'American Dream' and HOPE Bills

AUTHOR(S)
Vadum, Matthew
PUB. DATE
May 2003
SOURCE
Bond Buyer;5/8/2003, Vol. 344 Issue 31631, p3
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The House Financial Services housing subcommittee easily approved two separate bills on May 8, 2003, that could have an impact on the municipal bond market. One of the bills would authorize down-payment assistance for homebuyers, while the other would keep alive a program thatthe Bush administration considers to be a financial expenditure. The panel approved both measures by voice vote. The program would operate as part of the Department of Housing and Urban Development's HOME Investment Partnerships Program, which helps to expand the supply of affordable housing for low-and very low-income families by providing grants to states and local governments. Bond financing is sometimes involved in affordable housing projects that use HOME money, and analysts have said funds provided under the proposed program could encourage bond issuance.
ACCESSION #
9845577

 

Related Articles

  • N.J. Arena Plan May Hit Snag As Protesters Seek Referendum. D'Ambrosio, Jill // Bond Buyer;6/4/2004, Vol. 348 Issue 31898, p3 

    Reports that the Newark, N.J., Housing Authority's upcoming $199.4 million rent-backed bond sale may be thrown into question as a legal battle between city officials and proponents of a referendum plan gets underway in 2004. Key issues of interest; Analysis of pertinent topics and relevant...

  • Affordable Housing? Murphy, Gavin // Bond Buyer;7/9/2004, Vol. 349 Issue 31922, p31 

    Reports that the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in San Francisco, California, will consider on July 13, 2004, a $200 million affordable housing bond measure that proponents want to appear on the November 2004 ballot.

  • Californians Face $10B of Local Debt. Saskal, Rich // Bond Buyer;10/13/2006, Vol. 358 Issue 32486, p1 

    The article reports on the $10 billion local bond measures of the state of California. At least 83 different bond request are on local ballots around the state, which seeks voter approval of $10.5 billion of general obligation (GO) debt. The majority of these GOs are for school districts, but...

  • L.A. Housing Bond Redux? Saskal, Rich // Bond Buyer;3/9/2007, Vol. 359 Issue 32583, p9 

    The article reports on the decision of Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa to engage voters on another attempt to approve the bonds for affordable housing in Los Angeles, California. It is accounted that the general obligation bonds which seek to finance affordable housing failed to get two-thirds...

  • Small, Steady Texas MUDs Keep on Bonding. Philyaw, Jason // Bond Buyer;3/11/2008, Vol. 363 Issue 32833, p1 

    The article reports on the significance of using municipal utility districts (MUD) bonds to provide the infrastructure for new housing development in Texas. It states that some Texas communities are using small bonds issues sold by MUD since it demands for the low-rated and its unrated debt...

  • Healthy Debt Requests. Saskal, Rich // Bond Buyer;3/10/2006, Vol. 355 Issue 32336, p31 

    The article presents news concerning hospital bonds in San Diego County, California as of March 10, 2006. The board of the Grossmont Healthcare District has voted to put a $247 million general obligation bond measure on the June 6 ballot. Tri-City Healthcare District has approved a bond measure...

  • S.F. Bonds of Justice. Cohen, Jackie // Bond Buyer;8/4/2006, Vol. 358 Issue 32438, p39 

    The article focuses on a 10-year capital improvement plan approved by the San Francisco, California's Board of Supervisors. The plan includes asking voters in fiscal 2010 to authorize $535 million in general obligation bonds to pay for the non-court portions of a building replacing the city's...

  • Detroit Eyes Debt Vote. Carvlin, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;7/28/2004, Vol. 349 Issue 31935, p27 

    Cites the plan of the city council of Detroit, Michigan to vote on a measure that would ask voters in November 2004 to authorize bonds for several capital projects in 2006. Provisions of the proposed measure; Implications for the municipal bonds market.

  • Two New England Issuers Prepare Refunding Deals. O'Brien, Elizabeth // Bond Buyer;11/12/2004, Vol. 350 Issue 32009, p34 

    Reports on plans by bond issuers in Connecticut and Massachusetts to proceed with refunding deals despite some market softening in the aftermath of an increase in non-farm payrolls in October 2004. Components of Connecticut's $350 million special tax obligation bond deal; Use of proceeds from...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics