TITLE

Virginia to Present Arguments Over Future Potomac River Project Rights

AUTHOR(S)
Sanchez, Humberto
PUB. DATE
April 2003
SOURCE
Bond Buyer;4/30/2003, Vol. 344 Issue 31625, p5
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The U.S. Supreme Court will hear a case in fall 2003 that will decide if Virginia and its localities must seek permission from Maryland to build water intakes and other public works projects that extend into the Potomac River in Maryland and Virginia. The court's decision to hear the case follows a recommendation in December 2003 by a court-appointed special master that, if adopted by the court, would make it easier and cheaper for Virginia and its communities to build facilities to draw water from the river. The case stems from a challenge by Maryland, which owns the river, to a 725-foot-long water intake pipe that the Fairfax County Water Authority.
ACCESSION #
9810717

 

Related Articles

  • PW Solutions: 2014 WaterWorks.  // Public Works;Sep2014, p9 

    The article informs that recent reauthorization of Water Resources Development Act has given local water and sewer authorities more influence on federal projects and a new financing option.

  • STATE OF ARIZONA v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA: ON BILL OF COMPLAINT.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on the U.S. Supreme Court case Arizona v. California, March 27, 2006, on Arizona's bill of complaint against California for distribution of river water. The Court ordered Arizona, California, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Coachella...

  • Groups Aim at Proposed Rules Chief. Garvey, Charlotte S. // Rock Products;Oct2006, Vol. 109 Issue 10, p2 

    The article discusses various environmental issues in the U.S. as of October 2006. An advocacy group has criticized public official Susan Dudley regarding some of her writings that allegedly shows that she will reverse the environment and safety rules. The Senate Environment and Public Works...

  • CITY RESIDENT PREFERENCE UPHELD.  // Labor Law Journal;Apr83, Vol. 34 Issue 4, p207 

    The article reports on the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case "White v. Massachusetts Council of Construction Employers," that a city was entitled to require that at least one-half of those working on city-funded construction projects be city residents. The Court overturned a ruling...

  • River Shippers Look to Senate.  // Traffic World;4/30/2007, Vol. 271 Issue 17, p13 

    The article reports that the U.S. House has passed the Water Resources Development Act in a 394-25 vote. According to the author, the bill would finance projects for the rivers and support other projects on the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and the reroute of the Matagorda Bay. With the bill's...

  • MAKING A SPLASH. Miller, Joanna // U.S. Business Review;Oct/Nov2008, Vol. 9 Issue 8, p86 

    The article focuses on the two ongoing high-profile water resource projects in a rural county in California headed by San Luis Obispo County Public Works. The $200 million Nacimiento water project involves the construction of a 45-mile pipeline from the Nacimiento Reservoir in the northern part...

  • More homes for Romania.  // International Construction;Jul98, Vol. 37 Issue 7, p8 

    Anticipates Romanian Public Works Ministry's announcement of the successful bidders in a tender to build and finance a low-cost housing and water upgrading project. Details of the project; Background of the bidders.

  • NEWS IN BRIEF.  // MEED: Middle East Economic Digest;5/12/2006, Vol. 50 Issue 19, p19 

    The article presents news briefs on construction contracts in the Middle East. More than 25 international and local companies and groups have submitted prequalification applications by the early-May 2006 deadline for the concession to provide power and potable water to Failaka island in Kuwait....

  • Pollock v. Farmers' Loan and Trust Company.  // Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Company;8/1/2017, p1 

    Presents the case Pollock v. Farmers' Loan and Trust Company presented before the United States Supreme Court in March of 1895. History of the case; Arguments; Opinions of Court; Comments of the Judges.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics