TITLE

Is an International Corporate Human Rights liability framework needed? An Economic Power, Business and Human Rights, and American Extraterritorial Jurisdiction analysis

AUTHOR(S)
Carlos Arevalo
PUB. DATE
July 2013
SOURCE
Opinión Jurídica;jul-dic2013, Vol. 12 Issue 24, p101
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
All companies, regardless of the sector they belong to, can positively or negatively impact human rights. Governments are increasingly aware of the benefits that free trade brings their nations, which has led them to do whatever is necessary to attract foreign investment, even if it means to act against the interests of their own people. The power relationship between corporations and states generates a tension derived from their nature: while the objective of states is the welfare of its members, the purpose of corporations is profit. It is in the crack generated by the collision of powers and purposes between these two actors, that this article is intended to raise the discussion on the need to establish an international framework for corporate liability for human rights violations. To achieve its goal, the article will analyze the opportunities and obstacles raised by the exercise of extraterritorial jurisdiction in the American context and its relationship with the developments in the business and human rights field.
ACCESSION #
98041145

 

Related Articles

  • Corporate human rights obligations and international investment law. Černič, Jernej Letnar // Anuario Colombiano de Derecho Internacional;2010, Vol. 3, p243 

    Globalisation has blurred the artificial borders that exist between economies and societies around the world. The activities of corporations in this globalised environment have often served as the catalyst for human rights violations; due to the lack of institutional protection, some...

  • Enhancing Corporate Accountability for Human Rights Violations: Is Extraterritoriality the Magic Potion? Bernaz, Nadia // Journal of Business Ethics;Oct2013, Vol. 117 Issue 3, p493 

    The United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, resulting from the work of John Ruggie and his team, largely depend on state action and corporate good will for their implementation. One increasingly popular way for states to prevent and redress violations of human rights...

  • RISK SUMMARY: URUGUAY.  // Latin America Monitor: Southern Cone Monitor;Jun2011, Vol. 28 Issue 6, p8 

    This section offers news briefs on Uruguay as of May 2011, citing the dismissal of General Luis Pérez, the country's senior most general, which overturns the amnesty granted for the military's human rights violations, housing values rising to between 17% to 22%, resulting in an overheating...

  • THE MULTI-STATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR EXTRATERRITORIAL VIOLATIONS OF ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS. Howland, Todd // Denver Journal of International Law & Policy;Summer/Fall2007, Vol. 35 Issue 3/4, p389 

    The article discusses multi-state responsibility for extraterritorial violations in economic, social and cultural rights. The author focuses on the possible change of perspective in the promotion of protecting human rights. It discusses the trends and developments in the rights and obligations...

  • CORPORATE HUMAN RIGHTS ACCOUNTABILITY: THE OBJECTIONS OF WESTERN GOVERNMENTS TO THE ALIEN TORT STATUTE. Kohl, Uta // International & Comparative Law Quarterly;Jul2014, Vol. 63 Issue 3, p665 

    The almost two decade-long bonanza of civil litigation concerning gross human rights violations committed by corporations under the US Alien Tort Statute 1789 was scaled back by the US Supreme Court in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum in April 2013. The court restricted the territorial reach of...

  • A SOFT LAW MECHANISM FOR CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY: HOW THE UPDATED OECD GUIDELINES FOR MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES PROMOTE BUSINESS FOR THE FUTURE. Santner, Ashley L. // George Washington International Law Review;2011, Vol. 43 Issue 2, p375 

    The article presents information on the guidelines for the multinational enterprises (MNE) set by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) based on foreign direct investment and international business. It further discusses the inter-governmental agreements for combating...

  • TERMS OF GLOBAL BUSINESS ENGAGEMENT IN ETHICALLY CHALLENGING ENVIRONMENTS: APPLICATIONS TO BURMA. Schermerhorn Jr., John R. // Business Ethics Quarterly;Jul99, Vol. 9 Issue 3, p485 

    Today's international business environment is complicated by human rights abuses and social and economic repression in various countries. This paper introduces controversies with foreign investment in Burma to develop and describe alternative terms of global business engagement in ethically...

  • MAGNITSKY ACT SUMMARY.  // International Debates;Nov2013, Vol. 11 Issue 8, p21 

    A summary is presented of the Russia and Moldova Jackson-Vanik Repeal and Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act of 2012.

  • Knowledge Work and the Databasing of Human Rights: Witness and Digital Economy of Suffering. Nayar, Pramod K. // IUP Journal of Commonwealth Literature;Jan2010, Vol. 2 Issue 1, p40 

    This essay argues that knowledge culture today is integral to the global archivization of human rights violations. Taking as its subject of analysis the website Witness, it argues that new forms of narratives emerge on a daily basis from across the world, constituting a new knowledge form about...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics