Why Not Interfere With Nature?

Michael, Mark A.
March 2002
Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Mar2002, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p89
Academic Journal
Advocates of an environmental ethic frequently claim that what makes an ethical theory truly and uniquely environmental is its commitment to the principle that environmental wholes such as species, ecosystems, and biotic communities are morally considerable. The prevailing view is that our primary duty towards these wholes is to respect their integrity, stability, and beauty, and that the best way to do this is to leave them alone, not interfere with them, and let nature follow its own course. But is that correct? Why should be refrain from interfering with nature'? There are two ways an environmentalist might try to justify an exceptionaless, prima facie principle of noninterference. First, she might claim that there is a contingent but universal connection between human interference and eco systemic harm. There is also an epistemic variant of this view. When faced with a decision concerning whether to interfere with an ecosystem, there will always be overwhelming reasons for thinking that interference will be harmful, regardless of the specific circumstances. Second, there might be some conceptual connection between interference and harm to ecosystems. For example, if the well-being of an ecosystem is identified with its wildness, and wildness is understood as the absence of human intervention or manipulation, then any human interference necessarily detracts from an ecosystem's wildness and thereby has a detrimental effect on its well-being. In this paper I examine these justifications in detail and argue that none can support an exceptionaless principle of noninterference.


Related Articles

  • Hope in Environmental Philosophy. Kretz, Lisa // Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics;Oct2013, Vol. 26 Issue 5, p925 

    Ecological philosophy requires a significant orientation to the role of hope in both theory and practice. I trace the limited presence of hope in ecological philosophy, and outline reasons why environmental hopelessness is a threat. I articulate and problematize recent environmental publications...

  • Who Has Moral Status in the Environment? A Spinozistic Answer. Gamlund, Espen // Trumpeter: Journal of Ecosophy;Winter2007, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p3 

    In this paper I will attempt to answer the question of who or what can have moral status in the environment in the sense that we show direct moral concern and respect toward them. The traditional answer to this question has been anthropocentric, where moral status is ascribed only to human...

  • The Silence That Can Speak: Nature, Ethics, and Interspecies Cosmopolitics. Mikulak, Michael // Environmental Philosophy;Fall2009, Vol. 6 Issue 2, p73 

    This article looks at the question of animality and silence in terms of developing a theory of interspecies cosmopolitics based on ecological dissensus. By starting with the author's own experiences taking care of chickens, this article engages the question of environmental ethics within the...

  • Ecosystem Health. McShane, Katie // Environmental Ethics;Fall2004, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p227 

    On most understandings of what an ecosystem is, it is a kind of thing that can be literally, not just metaphorically, healthy or unhealthy. Health is best understood as a kind of well-being; a thing's health is a matter of retaining those structures and functions that are good for it. While it...

  • Worldly (In)Difference and Ecological Ethics: Iris Murdoch and Emmanuel Levinas. Smith, Mick // Environmental Ethics;Spring2007, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p23 

    The natural world's myriad "differences" from human beings, and its apparent "indifference" to human purposes and ends, are often regarded as problems an environmental ethics must overcome. Perhaps, though, ecological ethics might instead be re-envisaged as a form of other-directed concern that...

  • ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY: AN UNPOSTPONABLE TASK.  // Leadership: Magazine for Managers;set2008, Vol. 5 Issue 15, p19 

    An introduction to a report about the environmental responsibility of individuals is presented.

  • From Environmental to Ecological Ethics: Toward a Practical Ethics for Ecologists and Conservationists. Minteer, Ben; Collins, James // Science & Engineering Ethics;Dec2008, Vol. 14 Issue 4, p483 

    Ecological research and conservation practice frequently raise difficult and varied ethical questions for scientific investigators and managers, including duties to public welfare, nonhuman individuals (i.e., animals and plants), populations, and ecosystems. The field of environmental ethics has...

  • Does the Sustainability Movement Sustain a Sustainable Design Ethic for Architecture? Spector, Tom // Environmental Ethics;Fall2006, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p248 

    The sustainability movement, currently gathering considerable attention from architects, derives much of its moral foundation from the theoretical initiatives of environmental ethics. Flow is the value of sustainability to mesh with architecture's time-tested values? The idea that an ethic of...

  • THE POWER & THE GLORY. Scharper, Stephen Bede // Alternatives Journal (AJ) - Canada's Environmental Voice;Sep/Oct2011, Vol. 37 Issue 5, p10 

    The author shares views on the issue involving energy in light of the present environmental challenges. He cites Aldo Leopold, known as wildlife ecologist and father of environmental ethics, who was one of the pioneering environmental thinkers that highlight soil as an energy circuit. He notes...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics