TITLE

Scientia Iuris - An Unsolved Philosophical Problem

AUTHOR(S)
Peczenik, Aleksander
PUB. DATE
September 2000
SOURCE
Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Sep2000, Vol. 3 Issue 3, p273
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Legal dogmatics in Continental European law (scientia iuris, Rechtswissenschaft) consists of professional legal writings whose task is to systematize and interpret valid law. Legal dogmatics pursues knowledge of the existing law, yet in many cases it leads to a change of the law. Among general theories of legal dogmatics, one may mention the theories of negligence, intent, adequate causation and ownership. The theories produce principles and they also produce defeasible rules. By means of production of general and defeasible theories, legal dogmatics aims at obtaining a system of law that is both internally coherent and harmonized with its background in morality and (political) philosophy. Legal dogmatics is necessary in the context of constitutional constraints on the majority rule. Only if the courts act on the basis of Reason can they be a legitimate counterpart of the majority rule. And Reason cannot be exhausted by particular decision making. It also needs a more abstract deliberation, given by expert jurists. However, legal dogmatics has been a target of several kinds of criticism: empirical, morally-political, epistemological, logical, and ontological. The position taken in this article is to answer such criticism by mutually adjusting philosophy and the practices of the law.
ACCESSION #
9778956

 

Related Articles

  • How Do You Deal with Criticism at Work? Rosner, Bob // Workforce (10928332);Apr99, Vol. 78 Issue 4, p22 

    Focuses on how to deal with criticism at work. How to encourage criticism; Importance of listening to employees; Why criticism should be appreciated.

  • Tennessee's disciplinary structure and process Part 5: Attorneys convicted of a crime. Shrader, Stacey // Tennessee Bar Journal;Oct2006, Vol. 42 Issue 10, p9 

    The article presents part five of a series on the disciplinary structure and process that governs ethical behavior of lawyers licensed in Tennessee. It explores how the state deals with lawyers convicted of crimes based on Rule 9 as amended by the Tennessee Supreme Court on April 25, 2006. The...

  • Reason and Authority in Legal Ethics. Wendel, W. Bradley // APA Newsletters;Spring2003, Vol. 2 Issue 2, p171 

    Considers a reformulation of legal ethics away from the role morality metaphor and away from its principal competitor, the law-centered version of legal ethics. Debate surrounding legal ethics about lawyers and the balance of first-order moral reasons; Metaphor for the role-differentiated...

  • THE ETHICS OF CLIENT SELECTION: A MORAL JUSTIFICATION FOR REPRESENTING UNPOPULAR CLIENTS. SHACHAR, TCHIA (TIA) // DePaul Journal for Social Justice;Fall2012, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p1 

    This essay discusses the ethics of client selection with an emphasis on a moral justification for representing unpopular clients. It explores popular theories of legal ethics concerning the ethics of the action of representation. It also examines the formation of a consensual macro conception of...

  • Legal Ethics-- Worlds in Collision. Glendon, Mary Ann // First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life;Mar1994, Issue 41, p21 

    Discusses the different ethical systems that were operating side-by-side in the legal profession. Sources of systemic corruption in the legal system; Threat to the legal profession; Relation of legal ethics to the systemic difficulties afflicting the legal profession.

  • Crunching Numbers. Cole, Martin // Bench & Bar of Minnesota;Nov2015, Vol. 72 Issue 10, p12 

    The author examine the operation of the lawyer disciplinary system in the U.S. state Minnesota. Topics discussed include consideration of number of complaints against a particular attorney, need of prompt solution to the allegations of misconduct of a lawyer, and the Rules on Lawyers...

  • CIVIL OBEDIENCE. Wendel, W. Bradley // Columbia Law Review;Mar2004, Vol. 104 Issue 2, p363 

    Discussions of legal ethics generally assume that lawyers should deliberate straightforwardly on the basis of reasons to act or refrain from acting. This model of deliberation fails to account for the role of the law in resolving normative disagreement and coordinating social activity by people...

  • On Legal Order: Some Criticism of the Received View. Guastini, Riccardo // Ethical Theory & Moral Practice;Sep2000, Vol. 3 Issue 3, p263 

    The author discusses a number of topics related to the concept of 'legal order' and the structure of legal orders. In particular, the following theses are challenged: (1) legal orders are sets of rules; (2) the criterion of membership to such sets is validity; (3) legal orders are dynamic sets;...

  • TAKING OWNERSHIP OF LEGAL OUTCOMES: AN ARGUMENT AGAINST DISSOCIATION PARADIGM AND ANALYTICAL GAMING. Khan, Liaquat Ali // St. Louis University Law Journal;Spring2011, Vol. 55 Issue 3, p887 

    The article focuses on the question of whether or not legal professionals take responsibility for legal outcomes. Information is provided on how the practice of law requires knowledge of the law, legal reasoning, and moral responsibility. The author discusses a law professional's...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics