TITLE

HAS EUROPEAN IMMIGRATION POLICY CHANGED? A BENCHMARKING ANALYSIS OF IMMIGRATION TRENDS TO 30 EUROPEAN COUNTRIES IN 1998-2011

AUTHOR(S)
Kaivo-oja, Jari
PUB. DATE
January 2014
SOURCE
European Integration Studies;2014, Issue 8, p66
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The purpose of research article is to present an analysis of European immigration policy in 1998-2011. The analyses and research tasks include: (1) immigration to the Nordic countries, (2) immigration to Baltic countries, (3) immigration to Germany, France, UK, Italy, Spain and Italy, (4) immigration to Czech Republic, Croatia, Hungary, Slovenia and Slovakia and (5) immigration to Austria, Poland, Switzerland, Belgium, and the Netherlands, and (6) immigration to Ireland, Greece, Portugal, Lichtenstein, Luxembourg, Malta and Cyprus. The research results include benchmarking trend analyses of immigration flows of analyzed countries for years 1998-2011. Thus, 14 years period of immigration flows in European continent is analyzed. Key results of the study inform us about various changes of immigration policy in the European Union, towards the "Fortress Europe" policy. The study includes some statistical comparative analyses and also logarithmic trend analyses (reported in Appendix 1). If we want to have evidence-based immigration policy in the European Union, these kinds of empirical trend analyses may help us to make informed decisions. These results indicate that in many European countries immigration policy has changed in a considerable way towards "Fortress Europe model" – especially during financial crisis. Biggest changes can be observed in Poland, in Iceland, in the Netherlands, in Greece, Spain, in Austria and in Lichtenstein. One remarkable change is that the United Kingdom and Germany have changed their rank positions as major immigration countries of the European Union in 1998-2011. Thus, in 2011 six major European countries taking immigrants to their county were the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Spain, France and Poland. In 1998 these six largest immigration flow countries were Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Greece, Italy and the Netherlands. Also other remarkable changes are reported in this empirical immigration study. However very latest publication of Eurostat (2014b) in May 2014 reveals that Germany was again in 2012 the biggest country taking immigrants in the EU-27 country group.
ACCESSION #
97722053

 

Related Articles

  • Religious Leaders Issue New Rallying Cry For Immigration Reform.  // Economic Opportunity Report;2010, Vol. 45 Issue 3, p23 

    The article informs that religious leaders of the U.S. have urged the U.S. Congress to pass meaningful immigration reform policy in 2010.

  • The Question Chest.  // Swedish American Genealogist;Mar2005, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p31 

    The article presents an answer to the question of legal age requirements for Swedish emigration policy during the 1800s.

  • BMA warns of cap on doctors.  // Pulse;11/10/2010, Vol. 70 Issue 34, p6 

    The article discusses the plan of the government of Great Britain to introduce an immigration cap as part of its pledge in reducing net migration.

  • Antiguan immigration policy questioned. Pryce, Vinette K. // New York Amsterdam News;10/31/2002, Vol. 93 Issue 44, p14 

    Comments on the immigration policy of Antigua and Barbuda. Reference to a case of a sniper John Allen Muhammad; Need for making the passport issuing system secure; Allegations against Muhammad.

  • Immigration cap could lead to skills shortages in key sectors. Baker, Kat // Personnel Today;6/8/2010, p3 

    The article focuses on the immigration cap policy proposed by the Great Britain Government which can lead to shortage of skills in some sectors.

  • Swiss limit Czech migrants. PEŇÁZOVÁ, EVA // Prague Post;5/ 2/2012, Vol. 21 Issue 18, pA3 

    The article that the decision of Swiss to limit immigration of Central and East European nations is attracting criticism from the officials of Czech Republic and scrutiny from Brussels, Belgium officials.

  • Virginia County Proves 'Attrition Through Enforcement' Works. Edwards Jr., James R. // Human Events;12/6/2010, Vol. 66 Issue 42, p14 

    The article discusses the effectiveness of the law-enforcement initiative in the immigration policy of Prince William County, Virginia, which was enacted to reduce illegal immigration in the county.

  • Gutless immigration policies put homeland at risk. Malkin, Michelle // Fort Worth Business Press;9/20/2002, Vol. 15 Issue 38, p44 

    Comments on the implementation of immigration policies in the United States and its effectiveness in curving illegal immigrants. Impact of politics on the immigration system; Preference for speed in travel procedures over safety; Installation of security measures.

  • Depart, visitor. MOLEFHE, WAME // New Internationalist;Oct2013, Issue 466, p7 

    A personal narrative is presented in which the author discusses her experiences with immigration policies on the border of Botswana and South Africa.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics