TITLE

'THE 2 WEEK UPPER GI CANCER RULE.' HOW SUCCESSFUL IS THIS? A RETROSPECTIVE AUDIT IN A DISTRICT GENERAL HOSPITAL

AUTHOR(S)
Warner, R.J.; Das, D.
PUB. DATE
April 2003
SOURCE
Gut;Apr2003 Supplement 1, Vol. 52, pA88
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The NHS Executive introduced a 2 week standard for cancer referrals in an attempt to speed up diagnosis and improve patient care. This has now been implemented, but are we improving our care because of it, or is it just an additional headache for endoscopy units? Aims: To assess how many referrals: 1) were endoscoped (OGD) within 2 weeks, 2) identified cancer, 3) for upper Gastrointestinal (Gl) cancer came via our cancer office—the Bobby Moore Oncology Unit. Methods: We performed a retrospective audit of apl patients referred via the Bobby Moore unit in a 12 month period. Faxed referrals were made on a standard proforma that was distributed to all local GPs. Data were collected looking at referral information and OGD results. Results: 146 referrals were received (age range 23-92), of which 144 (98.6%) were offered OGD within 2 weeks. 10 patients did not attend 1st appointment. 10/146 (6.8%) had cancer, 6 oesophageal, 2 gastric, 1 pharyngeal and 1 direct spread From transverse colon. Over the same period 61 oesophageal and 43 gastric cancers were identified via alternative routes, ie only 7.7% of upper Gl cancers came on the cancer proforma. Recent onset dyspepsia in patients > 45 years as the only symptom (28/146) yielded 0 cancers, whereas 11% of patients with dysphagia had cancer. Conclusions: We only detected 7.7% of upper Gl cancers via our cancer proforma. Patients who did not attend in our study did not have cancer on subsequent OGD. Dyspepsia alone did not yield any cancers. Although offering this rapid access service we may be delaying OGDs for patients with cancer referred from other sources.
ACCESSION #
9747874

 

Related Articles

  • Palliative Care in the Outpatient Oncology Setting: Evaluation of a Practical Set of Referral Criteria. Glare, Paul A.; Semple, Deborah; Stabler, Stacy M.; Saltz, Leonard B. // Journal of Oncology Practice;Nov2011, Vol. 7 Issue 6, p366 

    Background: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network's (NCCN) palliative care (PC) guidelines recommend screening all patients for PC issues at the first visit with their oncologist and at subsequent, clinically relevant times. Criteria for referral to a PC specialist are also part of the...

  • Time to listen again. Hack, Thomas; Beaver, Kinta // Cancer Nursing Practice;Mar2013, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p9 

    The article states that Canada has seen an increase in the use of consultation recordings to help cancer patients remember important information given during the initial treatment consultation by their oncology team, beneficial to both patients and nurses. It cites a study which found that...

  • Stage, survival and delays in lung, colorectal, prostate and ovarian cancer: comparison between diagnostic routes. Neal, Richard D.; Allgar, Victoria L.; Ali, Nasreen; Leese, Brenda; Heywood, Phil; Proctor, Gill; Evans, Joyce // British Journal of General Practice;Mar2007, Vol. 57 Issue 536, p212 

    Background Very few studies have reported cancer outcomes of patients referred through different routes, despite the prominence of current UK cancer urgent referral guidance. Aim This study aimed to compare outcomes of cancer patients referred through the urgent referral guidance with those who...

  • Two-week rule a failure'.  // Pulse;7/19/2007, Vol. 67 Issue 28, p13 

    The article focuses on the significance of the two-week referral rule among the cancer patients in Great Britain. Study shows that the rule is failing cancer patients referred through both the fast-track and the routine pathways. It tends to overwhelm hospitals with inappropriate referrals and...

  • Feasibility of implementing the 'Screening for Distress and Referral Need' process in 23 Dutch hospitals. Nuenen, F.; Donofrio, S.; Tuinman, M.; Wiel, H.; Hoekstra-Weebers, J. // Supportive Care in Cancer;Jan2017, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p103 

    Purpose: In the Netherlands, the three-step process 'Screening for Distress and Referral Need' (SDRN) was developed for helping identifying, and referring cancer patients suffering from clinically relevant distress or needing a referral. This process includes (1) instrument completion, (2)...

  • CANCER PREHABILITATION--MOVING FROM PRIMARY CARE TO ONCOLOGY. Silver, Julie // Clinical Advisor;Feb2015, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p62 

    No abstract available.

  • H. pylori test-and-treat strategy in dyspepsia cost saving.  // PharmacoEconomics & Outcomes News;11/20/2004, Issue 466, p8 

    Discusses research being done on the long-term effect of carbon urea breath test (C-UBT) on the number of open-access endoscopy referrals in patients who had dyspepsia in Great Britain. Reference to a study by A. Sreedharan et al published in the October 2004 issue of the "European Journal of...

  • Clinical Ethics Consultation in Oncology. Shuman, Andrew G.; Montas, Sacha M.; Barnosky, Andrew R.; Smith, Lauren B.; Fins, Joseph J.; McCabe, Mary S. // Journal of Oncology Practice;Sep2013, Vol. 9 Issue 5, Following p240 

    Purpose: There is limited empirical research exploring the nature of clinical ethical consultations within the oncology population. Our objective was to review and describe clinical ethics consultations at two National Cancer Institute--designated comprehensive cancer centers to identify...

  • New guidelines for urgent referral of patients with cancer.  // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);05/27/2000, Vol. 320 Issue 7247, p1476 

    Presents two letters responding on a January 1, 2000 article from the `BMJ' periodical about the guidelines for urgent referral of patients with cancer in Great Britain. Details on the guidelines of the British Department of Health; Benefits of the guidelines for patients; Key factor in the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics