Chaudhri, S.; Reay, E.; Nair, S.; Jones, L.; N ah, A.; Gonsalves, S.; Houng, H.; Horgan, A.F.
April 2003
Gut;Apr2003 Supplement 1, Vol. 52, pA40
Academic Journal
The two week cancer referral rule was introduced to minimise the delay in diagnosis of cancers and introduce a fast track pathway for management of these patients. It has had significant implications for colorectal surgical practice leading to increased pressure on clinic and endoscopy lists. All patients referred with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer over a 6 month period were studied. Patients were seen at the outpatient clinic, flexible sigmoidoscopy clinic, or a direct access rectal bleeding clinic (DARC). In addition all referrals sent via the two week guidelines for colorectal cancer during the same period were audited. Methods of referral and utilisation of investigations were analysed, including the waiting times, investigations performed, and outcome. Information was analysed for 709 patients. Of those patients referred via the two week rule (243), 80% were first seen at OPD and 97% underwent complete colonic investigation. Colorectal cancer was diagnosed in 6% of these patients, and all but one cancer would have been within range of a flexible sigmoidoscope. The cancer pick up rate was 6% and median time to histological diagnosis of cancer was 63 days (range 34-155). Referrals to the DARC (210) during the same period led to a diagnosis of CRC in 4.8%, with a median time to diagnosis of (x) days. Of 100 patients with colorectal cancer, 90% would have met the eligibility criteria for 14 day referral. Despite compliance with the two week rule, the diagnosis of colorectal cancer in this group of patients is delayed compared with patients where referral are made directly to Flexible sigmoidoscopy clinics. Given that 97% of these patients require complete visualisation of their colon it may be more appropriate to reorganise colorectal services so as to enable a greater number of patients to be assessed directly by means of endoscopic examination.


Related Articles

  • Spring Meeting Ulster Society of Gastroenterology, 10th March 2011.  // Ulster Medical Journal;Jan2012, Vol. 81 Issue 1, p56 

    The article presents abstracts on gastroenterology-related topics, including the articles "Diagnosing Colorectal Carcinoma: Red Flag or Red Herring?" by A. S. McCoubrey, C. Warren, R. Gilliland, and others, "Audit of Red Flag Endoscopy Referrals in Whiteabbey Hospital," by C. Braniff, I. Carl,...

  • Increasing Prevalence of Right-Sided Colonic Adenomas in a High-Volume Endoscopy Department in Romania: Implications for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Vişovan, Irina Ioana; Tanşau, Marcel; Ciobanu, Lidia; Pascu, Oliviu; Tanşau, Alina // Journal of Gastrointestinal & Liver Diseases;Jun2014, Vol. 23 Issue 2, p147 

    Background & Aims: A gradual shift of colorectal adenoma and carcinoma location toward the proximal colon has been recently observed both in the United States and Europe. We aimed to study the polyp and adenoma detection rate in a major endoscopy center of northwestern Romania over a 16-year...

  • Costs of bowel Ca screening to soar.  // Pulse;3/15/2007, Vol. 67 Issue 10, p15 

    The article focuses on a new British analysis which warns that bowel cancer screening will send demand for endoscopy by 69%. Figures based on the British colorectal cancer screening pilot suggest the resulting costs are expected to outstrip the allocated cash. About 1.9% of patients are likely...

  • Do distal adenomas mandate total colonoscopy? Khan, A.; Shrier, I.; Gordon, P.H. // Surgical Endoscopy;Jun2003, Vol. 17 Issue 6, p886 

    Background: Distal adenomas have been considered markers of proximal neoplasms. It also has been suggested that patients with small, distal adenomas do not require proximal examination of the colon. This study was conducted to determine the validity of the latter recommendation. Methods: From a...

  • Which tool is best for colorectal cancer screening? Bretthauer, Michael // BMJ: British Medical Journal (Overseas & Retired Doctors Edition;6/12/2010, Vol. 340 Issue 7759, p1259 

    The author ponders on the use of flexible sigmoidoscopy for colorectal cancer diagnosis. He highlights the findings of the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial, which examined the impact of sigmoidoscopy screening on the prevalence of and mortality for colorectal cancer. He presents a...

  • Colonoscopy vs Sigmoidoscopy: New Studies Fuel Ongoing Debate. Schmidt, Charlie // JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute;9/19/2012, Vol. 104 Issue 18, p1350 

    The article discusses studies that fuelled debates over endoscopy in screening colorectal cancer. A study by Robert Schoen et al in the May 21, 2012 issue of the "New England Journal of Medicine" showed that sigmoidoscopy reduced colon cancer incidence by 21% and mortality by 50%. Nancy Baxter...

  • The association between referral source and outcome in patients with colorectal cancer. Schneider, Crispin; Beuis, Paul M.; Durdey, Paul; Thomas, Michael G.; Sylvester, Paul A.; Longman, Robert J. // Surgeon (Elsevier Science);Jun2013, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p141 

    Aim: The colorectal two-week wait fast track (FT) referral system was nationally implemented in the UK in 2000 to ensure patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) received prompt access to specialized services. The aim of this study was to determine the association between the mechanism of referral...

  • Colon cancer two-week rule is revised. Tanday, Sanjay // GP: General Practitioner;10/5/2007, p42 

    The article reports that over half of general practices in England are failing to use the two-week-wait referral system to diagnose colorectal cancer. The two-week-wait referral guidelines for colorectal cancer were introduced in July 2000 to help General Practitioners (GP) prioritize referral...

  • Association Between Colonic Screening, Subject Characteristics, and Stage of Colorectal Cancer. Fazio, Laura; Cotterchio, Michelle; Manno, Michael; McLaughlin, John; Gallinger, Steven // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Nov2005, Vol. 100 Issue 11, p2531 

    OBJECTIVES: Colorectal cancer remains a significant cause of mortality and morbidity in North America. Colorectal cancer survival is highly dependent on stage at diagnosis, therefore it is important to identify factors related to stage. This study evaluated the association between subject...


Read the Article


Sign out of this library

Other Topics