TITLE

PERFORMANCE AT SCREENING FLEXIBLE SIGMOIDOSCOPY: A NEW VIDEO ASSESSMENT TOOL

AUTHOR(S)
Thomas-Gibson, S.; Atkin, W.; Rutter, M.D.; Suzuki, N.; Vance, M.E.; Quraishy, M.S.; Swain, D.; Nicholls, A.; Saunders, B.P.
PUB. DATE
April 2003
SOURCE
Gut;Apr2003 Supplement 1, Vol. 52, pA34
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: Adenoma detection rates (ADR) at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) are known to be variable. No existing objective method for scoring endoscopy performance exists. Aims: To develop a video assessment tool that evaluates performance in FS for potential screening purposes, the main objective being confidence that no lesions are missed during an examination (exam). Methods: Eight experiments using video footage from a selection of 40 000 cases from the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial were performed. 5 experienced endoscopists independently scored, on average 5 exams from different endoscopists with varying ADRs. All experiments tested inter-observer variability (IOV), experiments 7 and 8 tested correlation of scores with ADR (validity) by looking at several cases from an individual endoscopist back-to-back. Cases were selected and extubations edited together by independent researchers. Variables assessed were: Bowel mucosa NOT visualised; Confidence NO lesion missed; Time spent viewing mucosa; re-exam of poorly viewed areas; Suctioning of fluid; Luminal distension; lower rectal exam; and overall quality of exam. Experiments 1-3 used Visual Analogue Scales (VAS), replaced in experiments 4-8 (due to high IOV) by grades A-E (A = excellent, B = good, C = needs improving, D = not good enough, E = unacceptable). Results: The A-E system produced less variability and more validity in predicting overall quality of exam. In experiments 7 and 8 the endoscopist with highest ADR was ranked as most technically proficient. In experiment 8 there was 100% agreement in 'Overall' score given for 2 of 3 endoscopists when 5 cases from each were viewed back-to-back. For the third, all scorers agreed that the endoscopist needed to improve their technique (Grades C or D). Conclusions: An objective performance score for screening FS based on video footage is possible. There is less inter-observer variability when 5 cases from an individual endoscopist are viewed...
ACCESSION #
9747489

 

Related Articles

  • QUALITY OF PERFORMANCE AT SCREENING FLEXIBLE SIGMOIDOSCOPY CORRELATES WITH ADENOMA DETECTION RATES. Thomas-Gibson, S.; Swain, D.; Schofield, G.; Saunder, B. P.; Atkin, W. // Gut;Apr2004 Supplement 3, Vol. 53, pA8 

    Adenoma detection rates (ADR) at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) are known to be variable. Authors have previously described an objective performance score for screening FS based on video footage. Video footage from 260 FS cases was selected from 40000 cases from Flexible Sigmoidoscopy...

  • Hyperplastic Colon Polyps--Are They Markers? Wayne, Jerome D. // Annals of Internal Medicine;12/1/88, Vol. 109 Issue 11, p851 

    Comments on a study by E. Achkar and W. Carey on small polyps found during fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy in asymptomatic patients. Prevalence of hyperplastic polyps in several autopsy findings; Issue on whether hyperplastic polyp is a marker that predicts the population subset with proximal adenomas.

  • Colonoscopy for small adenomatous polyps. SADOVSKY, RICHARD // American Family Physician;1/1/1999, Vol. 59 Issue 1, p179 

    Presents a summary of the study `Is colonoscopy indicated for small adenomas found by screening flexible sigmoidoscopy?,' by M. B. Wallace, et al from the `Annals of Internal Medicine' dated August 15, 1998.

  • Even tiny rectosigmoid adenomas warrant colonoscopy.  // Modern Medicine;Apr97, Vol. 65 Issue 4, p54 

    Presents an abstract of the article `Importance of Adenomas 5mm or less in Diameter that Are Detected by Sigmoidoscopy,' by T.E. Read, J.D. Read et al, from the January 2, 1997 issue of the `New England Journal of Medicine.' Recommendation for colonoscopy for asymptomatic average-risk patients...

  • Endoscopic sigmoidopexy: a safer way to treat sigmoid volvulus? Choi, D.; Carter, R. // Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh;Feb98, Vol. 43 Issue 1, p64 

    Examines the effectiveness of endoscopic sigmoidopexy in treating sigmoid volvulus. Equipments use in the endoscopic technique; Use of sigmoidoscopy in identifying the volvulus apex; Importance of rigid sigmoidoscopy on sigmoid volvulus reduction.

  • IS THE UK GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY TRAINING ADEQUATE? THE TRAINER'S AND TRAINEE'S PERSPECTIVES. Mahmood, T.; Darzi, A.; Boucier-Hayes, D.; Bann, S. // Gut;Apr2003 Supplement 1, Vol. 52, pA6 

    Objectives: To measure the training standards in gastrointestinal endoscopy from the perspective of the specialist registrars (SpRs) and the trainers. Design: Content validated, computer coded, mailed questionnaire. Setting: Academic Surgical Unit, Imperial College of Medicine, London....

  • Underuse of Screening Sigmoidoscopy and Colonoscopy in a Large Cohort of US Adults. Chao, Ann; Connell, Cari J.; Cokkinides, Vilma; Jacobs, Eric J.; Calle, Eugenia E.; Thun, Michael J. // American Journal of Public Health;Oct2004, Vol. 94 Issue 10, p1775 

    Objectives. We examined the prevalence of endoscopy (sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy) by indication and by demographic and lifestyle factors. Methods. We analyzed cross-sectional data collected in 1997 from participants aged 50 years and older in the Cancer Prevention Study (CPS) II Nutrition...

  • How To Become Trained in an Endoscopic Procedure after the Fellowship Program. Waye, Jerome D. // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Jul1986, Vol. 81 Issue 7, p611 

    Discusses the problem facing physicians in the U.S. on how to become trained in an endoscopic procedure after they finish fellowship program. Pilot program provided by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy for teaching flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy to interested physicians;...

  • Endoscopy III.  // Gut;2015 Supplement1, Vol. 64, pA405 

    The article presents abstracts on endoscopy including yield of pathology from flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) in patients under 40 years, endoscopic mucosal resection of colonic polyps and use of Self-Expandable Metal Stents (SEMS) for management of variceal haemorrhage.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics