TITLE

INFORMED CONSENT FOR ENDOSCOPY: AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

AUTHOR(S)
Brooks, A.J.; Fotheringham, J.; Gane, J.; Sanders, D.S.; McAlindon, M.E.
PUB. DATE
April 2003
SOURCE
Gut;Apr2003 Supplement 1, Vol. 52, pA23
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Background: The amount and type of information that patients require about risk in order to consent to endoscopic procedures has never been established. Aims: To evaluate the amount of information patients undergoing endoscopic procedures require regarding risk. Methods: Patients were given written and verbal information about the nature, incidence, and consequences of complications, then asked how common each complication would have to be before requiring information for informed consent. Results: 150 colonoscopy and 150 gastroscopy patients were studied. 24-32% of gastroscopy and 31-43% of colonoscopy patients wanted to be informed of one or more complications irrespective of frequency. 19% of gastroscopy and 14% of colonoscopy patients wanted to know about all possible complications. This was unrelated to the severity of the complication. Among gastroscopy patients, 17-25% did not want to be informed of one or more complications no matter how serious or frequent they were, and again, this was unrelated to severity. In the colonoscopy patients only 2-17% did not want to be informed of one or more complications. Significantly fewer [0.7%] colonoscopy patients required no information about any complications, compared to gastroscopy patients (10%, p < 0.001). In both groups many more required information about serious complications than minor complications when the complications occurred with a risk rate < 1/1000 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Up to a fifth of patients want to be informed of all possible complications. Consenting for colonoscopy requires greater risk disclosure. Patient's threshold for information on major complications is much lower than for minor ones. Serious complications likely to occur in >1/1000 cases should be disclosed to all patients.
ACCESSION #
9747412

 

Related Articles

  • What mastectomy case means for providers. Bachman, Radha V.; Reding, Barbara // Same-Day Surgery;Nov2009, Vol. 33 Issue 11, p113 

    The article discusses the ways in providing informed consent for surgery practices. It relates the case of a 31-year-old woman who underwent an unnecessary left mastectomy without knowing the choices aside from mastectomy, and failed to receive a proper pre-surgical evaluation. It discusses the...

  • Informed Consent in Otologic Surgery: Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Risk Recall with an Illustrated Handout and a Nonillustrated Handout. Henry, Eric; Brown, Timothy; Bartlett, Clark; Massoud, Emad; Bance, Manohar // Journal of Otolaryngology -- Head & Neck Surgery;Apr2008, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p273 

    Objective: Following consent, do pictures in a handout improve patients' recall of otologic surgical risks? Study Design: Prospective, randomized trial in a tertiary care centre. Methods: Patients undergoing otologic surgery were consented with a standardized checklist of risks by two surgeons....

  • Cognitive Function in Patients Undergoing Arthroplasty: The Implications for Informed Consent. Demosthenous, N.; St. Mart, J. P.; Jenkins, P.; Chappel, A.; Cheng, Kenneth // Advances in Orthopedics;2011, p1 

    Obtaining informed consent for an operation is a fundamental daily interaction between orthopaedic surgeon and patient. It is based on a patient's capacity to understand and retain information about the proposed procedure, the potential consequences of having it, and the alternative options...

  • What are we telling our patients? A survey of risk disclosure for anaesthesia in Australia and New Zealand. BRAUN, A. R.; LESLIE, K.; MERRY, A. F.; STORY, D. // Anaesthesia & Intensive Care;Sep2010, Vol. 38 Issue 5, p935 

    The article presents a study which examines the risk disclosed in knee arthroscopy, lumbar laminectomy, laparoscopic appendectomy and laparotomy in Australia and New Zealand. An overview of the methodology used for the study is provided, including details of pilot and web surveys. Based on the...

  • What a signature adds to the consent process. Neary, Peter; Cahill, Ronan A.; Kirwan, W. O.; Kiely, E.; Redmond, H. P. // Surgical Endoscopy;Dec2008, Vol. 22 Issue 12, p2698 

    “Consent is a process by which a patient is informed and becomes a participant in decisions regarding their medical management.” It is argued, however, that providing a signature to a form adds little to the quality of this process. Views regarding the consent ritual of nonselected...

  • Nurse-led consent in endoscopy. Burrows, Anna; Asare, Jean // Gastrointestinal Nursing;Oct2014, Vol. 12 Issue 8, p24 

    In order to implement best practice in the consent process for patients undergoing endoscopy at Ashford and St Peter’s Hospitals NHS Trust, the registered nurses at the endoscopy department wanted to determine if nurse-led consent might present to patients a more consistent and...

  • Discussing life expectancy with surgical patients: Do patients want to know and how should this information be delivered? Clarke, Michael G.; Kennedy, Katherine P.; MacDonagh, Ruaraidh P. // BMC Medical Informatics & Decision Making;2008, Vol. 8 Issue 1, Special section p1 

    Background: Predicted patient life expectancy (LE) and survival probability (SP), based on a patient's medical history, are important components of surgical decision-making and informed consent. The objective of this study was to assess patients' interpretation of and desire to know information...

  • What Patients Expect to be Consented Versus What Doctors Tend to Inform for Preauricular Sinusectomy.  // Journal of International Advanced Otology;2010, Vol. 6 Issue 3, p320 

    No abstract available.

  • Patient Recall and Appropriate Timing for Obtaining Informed Consent for Endoscopic Procedures. Proctor, Deborah D.; Price, Jammie; Minhas, Balbir S.; Gumber, Subhash C.; Christie, Evangeline M. // American Journal of Gastroenterology;Apr1999, Vol. 94 Issue 4, p967 

    OBJECTIVES: Although informed consent is an issue in many medical malpractice claims, there is no standardized time or method to obtain informed consent for endoscopic procedures. The objectives of this study were to determine whether sedation for endoscopic procedures interfered with...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics