Michl, Jan
July 2014
ArchNet-IJAR;Jul2014, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p36
Academic Journal
The article argues that the present dominance of the modernist design idiom, and the general aesthetic inferiority of existing non-modernist stylistic alternatives, is a consequence of the fact that design schools have for decades banished non-modernist visual idioms from their curricula. The author discusses original arguments for the single-style / single taste modernist regime of contemporary design schools, and contends that the modernist vision of a single unified style, which prompted the banishment, was rooted in a backward-looking effort to imitate the aesthetic unity of pre-industrial, aristocratic epochs. Against the received view of modernism as an expression of modernity, the author argues that the modernists were, on the contrary, intent on suppressing the key novel feature of the modern time: its pluralism in general and its aesthetic diversity in particular. It is further asserted that the design philosophy behind the modernist regime was largely self-serving, aimed at securing the modernists an educational and aesthetic monopoly. The author pleads for transforming the modernist design education into a modern one, where a pluralism of aesthetic idioms and positions replaces the current one-style-fits-all approach.


Related Articles

  • Educational design and modernism in West Africa. Uduku, Ola // Docomomo Journal;Mar2003, Issue 28, p76 

    This paper describes the historical context to the development of a number of educational institutions built in Nigeria between the late 1940s to the early 1970s, which roughly cover the main period of modernist era architecture in West Africa. It focuses on their historical context, the issues...

  • Little Red School House New York City. Merkel, Jayne // Architectural Record;Jul2004 Supplement, Vol. 192, p24 

    This article discusses the construction of the Little Red School House of the Little Red School House and Elisabeth Irwin High School in New York City. The building brings the school more directly into the Greenwich Village community. An overview of the design of the building is given. The...

  • OUTSTANDING BUILDINGS--CAMPUS MASTER PLANNING.  // Grounds Maintenance;Nov2002, Vol. 37 Issue 11, p34 

    Examines the architectural design and master plan of several school buildings in the U.S. Key features and specifications; Design team responsible for the master plan; Implications on school designs.

  • Daylighted Dental School.  // American School & University Exclusive Insight;9/1/2012, p16 

    The article reviews the architectural design of the Georgia Health Sciences University (GHSU) College of Dental Medicine (CDM) building located in Augusta, Georgia, designed by Lord, Aeck & Sargent in collaboration with architect Francis Cauffman.

  • FIRST LOOK: BUCKLEY GRAY YEOMAN.  // Building Design;5/11/2012, Issue 2013, p4 

    The article focuses on the plans and design of Buckley Gray Yeoman Architects for the new buildings for Channing School in Highgate, North London, England.

  • University of Texas at Arlington -- Maverick Activities Center Renovation and Expansion.  // Athletic Business;Dec2008, Vol. 32 Issue 12, p56 

    The article reviews the architectural design of the renovated Maverick Activities Center of the University of Texas at Arlington, designed by Page Southerland Page.

  • FRIENDS SCHOOL. GERFEN, KATIE // Architect;Oct2009, Vol. 98 Issue 10, p91 

    The article reviews the architectural design of San Francisco Friends School in San Francisco, California which was designed by Pfau Long Architecture.

  • Camille Kendall Academic Center, University System of Maryland, Universities at Shady Grove Rockville, MD.  // Buildings;Oct2008, Vol. 102 Issue 10, p74 

    The article reviews the architectural design of the Camille Kendall Academic Center located at the Shady Grove satellite campus of the University of Maryland in Rockville.

  • A Select Group.  // American School & University;Nov2011, Vol. 84 Issue 3, p12 

    The article informs on the criteria that the jury of the 2011 Architectural Portfolio competition, held for schools in the U.S., should consider, which includes sustainability, flexibility and adaptability in schools designs, also the buildings should be energy efficient, and inspirational.


Other Topics