TITLE

Low blow

PUB. DATE
January 1998
SOURCE
Joe Weider's Muscle & Fitness;Jan98, Vol. 59 Issue 1, p30
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports in January 1998 that 2%-fat milk will change its label from low fat to reduced fat. Grams of fat per serving; Necessity of the change.
ACCESSION #
9712015548

 

Related Articles

  • FDA agrees new labelling changes for US milk.  // Dairy Industries International;Jan1997, Vol. 62 Issue 1, p5 

    Describes changes in milk labeling regulations in the United States. Naming of skim milk as fat free; Consideration of one-percent milk as light milk; Naming of two-percent low fat milk as two-percent reduced fat milk.

  • New milk labels.  // Better Homes & Gardens;June97, Vol. 75 Issue 6, p104 

    Presents the new milk designations to be found in the dairy case as a result of the Milk Processor Education Program's labeling program for milk. Fat free milk; Light milk; Reduced fat milk.

  • It's still moo juice.  // Beverage Industry;Jan1997, Vol. 88 Issue 1, p22 

    Deals with `consumer friendly' labels for cartons of milk that has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Label for the current lowfat term; Label for skim milk.

  • Chewing the fat. Dillingham, Maud // E: The Environmental Magazine;Sep/Oct95, Vol. 6 Issue 5, p42 

    Reports on the need of dairy advertisers to relabel milk packages in order to catch the attention of the fat-conscious public. Highlights on various advertisements on milk; Contact information.

  • Milking labels for all they're worth. Masterson, Peg // Advertising Age;9/5/1994, Vol. 65 Issue 37, p12 

    Reports on the debate over labeling milk products. Approval given to Monsanto Co. to market recombinant bovine growth hormone; Four states' approval of special rBGH-free labels; Prediction on the response of consumers.

  • Truth in labeling urged for 2% milk.  // HealthFacts;Jul95, Vol. 20 Issue 194, p1 

    Reports on the call by the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) and the Milk Industry Foundation for two percent milk to be labeled as reduced-fat milk. Two percent milk as not qualified to be described as low fat; CSPI nutrition director Bonnie Liebman's explanation on why dairy...

  • Claiming Milk's Greatness on the Label.  // Dairy Foods;Jul2002, Vol. 103 Issue 7, pF 

    Discusses a variety of claims associated with ingredients commonly found in milk and how U.S. marketers can effectively use the package to promote milk's inherent nutritional composition. Upstate Farms' use of the label to let consumers know that Milk for Life is full of calcium and protein;...

  • Beyond calcium: Extending dairy's message on the label. Miller, Gregory D. // Dairy Field;May99, Vol. 182 Issue 5, p6 

    Comments on nutrient labeling as a way to focus on milk's nutritional value in order to move dairy consumption in the United States. Dairy industry's efforts to reverse the declining trend in fluid milk consumption; Milk's strong calcium franchise; Nutritional content as milk's greatest asset;...

  • FDA makes changes in milk labeling.  // Dairy Foods;Jan1997, Vol. 98 Issue 1, p14 

    Details changes in milk labeling regulations of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) which take effect on January 1, 1998. Percentage of fat required for milk to be called `fat-free,' `light,' or `reduced fat'; Cooperation of the Milk Industry Foundation and the Center for Science in the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics