TITLE

Recent legal decisions affect you

AUTHOR(S)
Hatch, D. Diane; Hall, James E.
PUB. DATE
November 1997
SOURCE
Workforce (10928332);Nov97, Vol. 76 Issue 11, p70
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Presents a list of legal decisions in United States and its impact to employees. Provisions of the Executive Order 11246 published by the Department of Labor; Precaution in implementing the Mental Health Parity Acts; Benefit claims against Microsoft Corp.
ACCESSION #
9711264249

 

Related Articles

  • Keep Microsoft Bundled Up.  // Christian Science Monitor;7/3/2001, Vol. 93 Issue 153, p10 

    Editorial. Comments on the United States appeals court ruling that overturned a decision to split Microsoft Corp. in two, and suggests that there are advantages in the company seeking a court remedy rather than a settlement.

  • Microsoft request for Fed. Circuit review of suit nixed. Mintz, Jessica // Buffalo Law Journal;4/8/2010, Vol. 82 Issue 28, p4 

    The article reports on the rejection of the federal appeals court on the request of Microsoft Corp.'s to conduct a review on the 290 million U.S. dollar patent ruling in Seattle, Washington.

  • Microsoft court battle: Unfair competition or free enterprise?  // Christian Science Monitor;4/22/98, Vol. 90 Issue 102, p18 

    Reports statements made at an April 21, 1998 appeals court hearing in the lawsuit between Microsoft Corp. and the United States government. Prior judgment about the bundling of Windows 95 with the Microsoft Internet Explorer; When a ruling is expected from the appeals court; Views of Microsoft...

  • Gates Skates. Bartholomew, Doug // Industry Week/IW;Feb2002, Vol. 251 Issue 2, p36 

    No abstract available.

  • Microsoft ruling doesn't end debate.  // Pensions & Investments;08/04/97, Vol. 25 Issue 16, p27 

    Presents information on the lawsuit against Microsoft Corporation in Redmond, Washington. Reasons for the court proceedings; Amount of persons involved in the lawsuit; Information on the ruling by the 9th United States Circuit Court of Appeals, San Francisco.

  • States pursue Microsoft.  // State Government News;Apr2002, Vol. 45 Issue 4, p7 

    Reports the states in the U.S. that filed antitrust claims against Microsoft regarding the issue of whether the company's antitrust case settlement would protect other companies from Microsoft's business practices.

  • Judge in Microsoft case confuses competitors and competition. Sowell // Enterprise/Salt Lake City;11/15/99, Vol. 29 Issue 21, p26 

    Focuses on the ruling in the antitrust case against Microsoft Corp. Specific laws that the company violated; Definition of monopoly.

  • Independent contractor or regular employee? Kirshenberg, Seth // Training & Development;Apr97, Vol. 51 Issue 4, p48 

    Focuses on an increasing practice among companies in the United States to hire temporary employees or independent contractors. Discussion of the case against Microsoft company for classifying employees as independent contractors and not as regular employees; Pension and welfare benefits plan...

  • Microsoft settles class-action lawsuits.  // Network World;11/26/2001, Vol. 18 Issue 48, p6 

    Reports the arrangements made by Microsoft regarding the class-action lawsuits in Maryland. Allegations regarding the overpricing of softwares owned by Microsoft; Arrangements made between Microsoft and the plaintiffs in the private antitrust lawsuits regarding the alleged monopoly.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics