TITLE

High Court tax cases could hurt state, local bond issuers

AUTHOR(S)
Reynolds, Katherine M.
PUB. DATE
November 1997
SOURCE
Bond Buyer;11/04/97, Vol. 322 Issue 30266, p4
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
States that the Supreme Court has agreed to hear two tax cases that could affect state or local bond issuers. Review of the Cass County, Minnesota, et al v. Leech Lake Band of Chippewa Indians; Arguments on the case of Michigan v. U.S. and Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe.
ACCESSION #
9711214210

 

Related Articles

  • Appeal Procedure.  // Assessment Journal;Sep/Oct98, Vol. 5 Issue 5, p67 

    Presents several court cases on tax abatement, expert witness and taxpayer refund action. Case of Quoddy Realty Corporation versus City of Eastport, on abatement of real estate tax; Mori versus Town of Secaucus, regarding cross-examination of a witness; Case of National Health Network Inc....

  • Schools sue hospitals. Becker, Cinda // Modern Healthcare;06/18/2001, Vol. 31 Issue 25, p54 

    Focuses on a taxation lawsuit that the Scranton (Pennsylvania) School District has filed against the Mercy Hospital of Scranton and Community Medical Center in Common Pleas Court, Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania. Other Scranton hospitals that will make payment in lieu of taxes under the 1997...

  • Personal Property.  // Assessment Journal;Sep/Oct99, Vol. 6 Issue 5, p97 

    Focuses on several tax assesment cases in the United States involving personal property. `Rowe-Reilly Corp. v. Tracy'; `W. H. Paige & Co. v. Board of Tax Commissioners'; `Marion v. Floyd County Board of Equalization.'

  • Lawsuit Proceeds Were Ordinary Income: Nahey V. Commissioner. Barr, Neil // Tax Lawyer;Summer99, Vol. 52 Issue 4, p881 

    Discusses the case of Brian L. Nahey versus the tax commissioner. Facts underlying the dispute; Details on the United States Tax Court's decision; Tax-planning ramifications of the court's holding.

  • Recalculation of Disability Retirement Benefits Based on Date of Hire Does Not Alter Section 104(a)(1) Tax-Exemption Treatment: Picard v. Commissioner.  // Tax Lawyer;Fall99, Vol. 53 Issue 1, p311 

    Offers a look at the case of Picard versus Commissioner and provides a background on section 104(a)(1) and the facts of Picard. Information on the decisions of the Tax Court and the Ninth Circuit; Critique of the Ninth Circuit's decision; Implications of the case.

  • Tax Cases: Advance Notes.  // Accountancy;Jun67, Vol. 78 Issue 886, p424 

    Cites several cases on taxation in Great Britain as of June 1967. 'Cleary v CIR'; 'Davies Jenkins and Co. Ltd. v Davies'; 'CIR v Brebner.'

  • Legislative lawsuit.  // Las Vegas Business Press;12/29/2003, Vol. 20 Issue 52, p21 

    Reports on the ruling of the Nevada Supreme Court over the Guinn versus Legislature of the State of Nevada Lawsuit. Approval of two-thirds rule for tax ncrease; Disagreement of justices over the rehearing of the case.

  • European law.  // Consumer Policy Review;Jul/Aug98, Vol. 8 Issue 4, p151 

    Features the case `Bayerrishe Hypotheken-und Wechselbank AG vs. Edgar Dietzinger' on right of cancellation under contract of guarantee.

  • Smokeless feuds. Warren, Martin // People Management;6/25/1998, Vol. 4 Issue 13, p25 

    Looks at several smoking-related cases in the United States. Dryden versus Greater Glasgow Health Board; Waltons & Morse versus Dorrington; Sparrow versus Saint Andrews Homes Ltd.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics